Compositions Comprising Receptor-Associated Protein (RAP) Variants Specific for LRP2 and Uses Thereof

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates generally to receptor-selective variants of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein (RAP) and compositions thereof, methods of generating such variants and methods of using such receptor-selective RAP variant compositions for therapeutic purposes. The invention also relates to antibodies that bind to one or a small subset of CR-containing proteins.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to receptor-selective variants of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-associated protein (RAP) and compositions thereof, methods of generating such variants and methods of using such receptor-selective RAP variant compositions for therapeutic purposes. The invention also relates to antibodies that bind selectively to one or a small subset of CR-containing proteins.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The low-density lipoprotein receptor domain class A, or complement-type repeat (CR), constitutes a large family of conserved protein sequences. Structural data on members of this family suggests that CR sequences adopt a characteristic fold, the LDL receptor-like module (structural Classification of Proteins, SCOP, terminology). CR sequences are found in a variety of different types of proteins including the low density lipoprotein receptor family and the type II transmembrane serine protease (matriptase) family. The LDLR are a family of cell-surface, transmembrane proteins that mediate a wide variety of physiological phenomena. Mechanisms of action include both trafficking of bound ligands and signal transduction from the extracellular space (1). The LDLR participate in various cellular functions, including but not limited to the metabolism of lipoproteins (2, 3), control of matrix metalloproteases and coagulation factors (4-6), specification of cell fate (3, 7), guidance of neural cell migration (7, 8), induction of proliferation in tumor cells (9, 10), binding of rhinovirus (11, 12), signalling by neurotransmitters (13, 14), acquisition of antigens by antigen presenting cells (15), trancytosis of ligands across the blood-brain barrier (16-19), recovery of proteins from glomerular filtrate (20), transport of endocrine hormones (21), efflux of amyloid β peptide from the brain (22), activation of bone deposition (23) and regulation of endothelial cell proliferation (24). The capacity of the LDLR to serve in so many roles derives in part from the diverse set of ligands to which these receptors are able to bind. Another feature of this receptor family is the diverse, and often unique, tissue distribution patterns of each LDLR. The type II transmembrane serine protease family includes corin and the matriptases ST14, matriptase-2 and matriptase-3. Matriptase (MT-SP1, ST14, TADG-15) is overexpressed in a variety of epithelial tumors (carcinomas) (25-33). Following transactivation induced by hepatocyte activator inhibitor-1 (HAI-1), matriptase promotes tumor growth and metastasis by degrading extracellular matrix components directly or by activating other proteases, such as urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), resulting in matrix-degradative events (26, 34, 35). In addition to the LDLR and matriptase families, a variety of other proteins have CR domains. One such protein, the FDC-8D6 antigen (CD320) has a pair of such domains and plays an important role in B-cell differentiation in lymphatic follicles (Li, et al., (2004) Blood 104, 815-21; Li, et al., (2000) J. Exp. Med. 191, 1077-84).

The important roles that LDLR and matriptases play in pathophysiological processes, along with the unique tissue-distribution profiles of some members of these families, make these proteins useful drug targets. Protein-selective drugs could directly impact the function of a targeted protein, diminishing the supporting effects that the protein has on a particular disease state. Alternatively, the drug could take advantage of the tissue distribution of the targeted protein to efficiently deliver other therapeutic molecules to a particular tissue affected by a disease. Despite considerable evidence of the importance of CR-containing proteins in mammalian physiology and pathophysiology, there are few examples of drugs that act selectively on particular members of the LDLR or CR-containing protein families. The ability to create molecules that bind specific members of the LDLR or related receptors, such as LRP2 would provide a means of developing such drugs.

Thus, there exists a need for agents with improved ability to bind selectively to specific receptors including but not limited to members of the LDLR, such as LRP2, and type II transmembrane serine protease families, either to directly affect the behavior of these proteins through the selective binding event or to facilitate delivery of a therapeutic agent to its site of action through the selective binding event.

One example where such receptor-selective molecules might be valuable is in the delivery of therapeutic molecules to the brain. There are approximately 4.5 million people in the US suffering from Alzheimer's disease, and another million with Parkinson's disease. Protein therapeutics for both disorders have shown promise in pre-clinical trials, but obstacles related to drug delivery have slowed development of these drugs (36, 37). The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a physical and metabolic barrier that separates the peripheral circulation from the central nervous system (CNS). While the BBB serves to protect the microenvironment of the brain, it also presents a challenge to the delivery of therapeutic drugs to the CNS (38, 39). Vehicle-mediated delivery has been widely explored as a means of protein-based drug delivery, but progress to date has been limited. Megalin (LRP2) is expressed on the BBB and there is evidence suggesting that this receptor can mediate transport of ligands into the brain. The best characterized ligands for megalin, including RAP and a variety of lipoproteins, may also exhibit nonspecific binding to other LDLR or are present at saturating levels in blood, competing with the binding of therapeutics. More selective ligands for megalin, molecules with no significant competition from endogenous ligands, would have improved trans-barrier transport properties.

Similarly, the VLDLR has been shown to be expressed on brain capillary endothelium and to mediate transport of lipoprotein lipase across the endothelium of the aorta (Wyne, et al. (1996) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16, 407-415; Obunike, et al. (2001) J Biol Chem 276, 8934-8941). Molecules that selectively bind to VLDLR or fusions containing drugs conjugated to such molecules might be expected to have enhanced distribution to the brain. There are potential applications for VLDLR-selective agents outside of brain delivery. The VLDLR has also been implicated in foam cell formation by mediating uptake of excess free fatty acids (FFA) into vascular macrophages (Hiltunen, et al., (1998) Circulation 97, 1079-1086; Qu, et al., (2004) J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 24, 1-4, 8). Molecules that selectively bind to VLDLR might be developed to block association of lipoprotein particles with macrophages and inhibit foam cell formation. Such molecules would also be expected to limit transfer of FFA from circulating lipoprotein into adipocytes, slowing the progression toward obesity in susceptible subjects (Goudriaan, et al. (2001) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21, 1488-1493; Goudriaan, et al. (2004) J Lipid Res 45, 1475-1481; Tacken, et al. (2001) Curr Opin Lipidol 12, 275-279; Yagyu, et al., (2002) J Biol Chem 277, 10037-10043). The high level of expression of VLDLR on the luminal surface of muscle endothelium, along with the low level of expression of VLDLR in liver, would be expected to drive distribution of VLDLR-selective RAP variants to muscle tissue after intravenous administration. Molecules with therapeutic effects on muscle tissue could be attached to VLDLR-selective agents to improve distribution of such molecules to muscle.

Treatments for other diseases may also be developed using binding moieties with enhanced selectivity for particular CR domains or combinations of CR domains. Overexpression of at least two LDLR, LRP5, LRP6, as well as matriptase (MT-ST1, ST14, TADG-15), has been associated with increased tumorigenicity of the affected tissue (Li, et al., (2004) Oncogene 23, 9129-9135; Hoang, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 109, 106-111; Tanimoto, et al., (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-283; Santin, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 112, 14-25; Santin, et al., (2003) Cancer 98, 1898-1904; Tanimoto, et al., (2001) Tumour Biol 22, 104-114). Molecules that bind to these proteins may provide a means of diminishing their tumorigenic effects, especially by interfering with their functions directly or but also potentially by targeting tissues that overexpress these proteins with anti-tumor drugs attached to the selective molecule. Matriptase is anchored in the lateral or basolateral membranes of epithelial cells through an N-terminal type II transmembrane domain (40). The membrane-embedded sequence is followed by an extracellular SEA domain, two CUB domains, four CR domains and a trypsin domain at the C-terminus of the protein. Mutagenesis of the CR sequences within matriptase results in a failure of the resulting protease mutant to become activated (41). Similarly, an antibody that binds to the third CR domain of matriptase blocks activation of the enzyme (42). A binding moiety with affinity for one of the two CR pairs within matriptase that include the third CR domain would be expected to interfere with proteolytic activation, in a manner similar to the observed inhibition by the antibody to this region. Such a variant would be expected to diminish the metastatic and tumorigenic effects of matriptase overexpression in affected tissues.

There are approximately eight million women in the US with osteoporosis. Enhanced Wnt signaling through the LDLR LRP5 has been demonstrated to increase osteoblast differentiation, inhibit osteoclast activity and enhance bone deposition (Westendorf, et al. (2004) Gene 341, 19-39; Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684; Mizuguchi, et al. (2004) J Hum Genet 49, 80-86). This mechanism has been validated with osteoblast-specific APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) knockout mice and with LRP5 mutants that are insensitive to DKK (Dickkopf)-1 and sclerostin-mediated inhibition (Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684; Holmen, et al. (2005) J Biol Chem). Intravenously-administered molecules that selectively bind LRP5 and interfere with inhibitor binding to LRP5 or otherwise enhance Wnt signaling through LRP5, might counter the effects of osteoporosis. Such molecules are not currently available.

Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) involves the proliferation and extranodal migration of a class of immune cells called B-cells. NHL is the leading cause of death from cancer in males between the ages of 20 and 39. Studies have shown that the FDC-8D6 antigen protein (CD320) facilitates neoplastic B-cell growth (Li, et al., (2004) Blood 104, 815-21; Li, et al., (2000) J. Exp. Med. 191, 1077-84). 8D6 antigen contains a single pair of CR domains. Agents, including antibodies, that bind to and block the function of 8D6 antigen might then be expected to slow the progression of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in humans.

Given the widespread participation of CR-containing proteins throughout mammalian physiology, polypeptides with binding-selectivity for particular LDLR CR domains have many possible pharmaceutical applications. Thus, there exists a need in the art for agents with improved ability to bind selectively to specific receptors including but not limited to members of the LDLR and related proteins, such as LRP2, in order to better target certain cells and/or organs for delivery of a therapeutic agent to its site of action.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to LRP2-selective RAP variants and derivatives that selectively bind a specific complement type repeat in the LRP2 protein, and uses of such variants as inhibitors or enhancers of said CR-containing protein, and uses of such variants for the targeted delivery of diagnostic or therapeutic agents to tissues expressing said CR-containing protein.

In one aspect, the invention provides a receptor-binding polypeptide moiety (also referred to herein as a RAP variant) that is a variant of the alpha-2-macroglobulin/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-associated protein 1 (RAP, Uniprot accession P30533, Pfam accession numbers PF06400 and PF06401) with selective binding affinity for LRP2. The present invention contemplates RAP sequence variants that have binding complementarity for CR domains of LRP2 that are not bound with high affinity by wild-type RAP and which are relatively unique to LRP2 compared to other CR-containing proteins. The RAP variant molecule may constitute a portion of the full-length RAP protein. In one embodiment, the RAP variant exhibits at least 2-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 7-fold, 10-fold or 20-fold binding selectivity for LRP2 compared to at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 other CR-containing proteins. Other CR-containing proteins include LDLR (P001130), LRP1 (P98157), LRP1B (Q9NZR2), LRP2 (P98164), LRP3 (O75074), LRP4 (O75096), LRP5 (O75197), LRP6 (O75581), FDC-8D6 (CD320), LRP8 (Q14114), Sortilin (Q92673), LRP10 (Q7Z4F1), LRP11 (Q86VZ4), LRP12 (Q9Y561), VLDLR (P98155), TADG-15 (ST14, Q8WVC1), TMPS3 (P57727), TMPS4 (Q9NRS4), TMPS6 (Q8IU80), Q6ICC2, Q6PJ72, Q76B361, Q7RTY8, Q7Z7K9, Q86YD5, Q8NAN7, Q8NBJ0, Q8WW88, Q96NT6, Q9BYE1, Q9BYE2, Q9NPF0 and corin (Q8IZR7). In particular, the RAP variant has protein-binding selectivity different from that of RAP.

The RAP variant differs from RAP through one or more mutations in its polypeptide sequence. In one embodiment, the RAP variants have mutations within the third domain (d3) of RAP. RAP d3 comprises amino acids 200-323 of mature RAP (Uniprot P30533) and amino acids 234-357 of precursor RAP (Uniprot P30533). In preferred embodiments, the variant is a receptor-selective variant that comprises a mutation at one, two, three, four, five, or six or more positions within any one of the regions selected from: amino acids 200-319, 300-319, or 247-257 of RAP of the mature form of the sequence set forth in Uniprot Accession No. P30533 (SEQ ID NO: 2). In exemplary embodiments, the polypeptide comprising a RAP variant comprises a mutation at one, two, three, four, five, six or more positions selected from the group consisting of 175, 213, 217, 249, 251, 256, 270 of mature P30533. In preferred embodiments, RAP variants contain at least one, two, three or four mutations at positions 249, 251, 256 and/or 270 of mature RAP. Thus, the invention specifically contemplates RAP variants with at least two mutations: at positions 249 and 251, or 249 and 256, or 249 and 270, or 251 and 256, or 251 and 270, or 256 and 270. Similarly, the invention specifically contemplates RAP variants with at least three mutations at positions 251, 256 and 270 and the like. Any of the preceding mutations may include replacement of an amino acid from the acidic group (D, E) with an amino acid from the basic group (K, R), or vice versa. Any of the preceding mutations may also include replacement of an amino acid from the group (A, C, D, E, G, I, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, V) with an amino acid from the group (F, Y, W, H). In a further embodiment, the polypeptide comprises three, four, five, six or more of the following mutations: V175L, S213T, E217K, H249Y, E251K, K256A, K270E, R205S, S213T, E217K, L226M, H249Y, B230V, S232P, E239G, E246G, E251L, E251K, E251T, E251G, E251P, E251N, E251R, K256R, K256V, K256A, K2561, K256P, K256L, 1266F, 1266T, K257Y, Q261R, A267V, H268R, K270P, K270D, K270N, K270G, K270E, K270W, H273Y, R287H, H290Y, H290L, E294V, R296L, T297I, K298R, S312F, G313D compared to the mature form of RAP (P30533). In another embodiment, it is contemplated that the polypeptide comprises a RAP variant that lacks at least amino acids 1-143 of RAP of mature P30533. In yet another embodiment, the polypeptide lacks up to 4 of the C-terminal amino acids of RAP of mature P30533.

In another aspect, the invention provides preparation of antibodies exhibiting selective binding affinity to a CR domain of these CR-containing proteins or receptors. The CR domain is preferably unique (i.e. found only in that CR-containing protein compared to other members of the family of CR-containing proteins), or is found in less than 10% of CRs derived from all the CRs in the proteome of an animal. A number of such unique or selective CR domains within CR-containing proteins are described herein. The subset of antibodies that bind to one of such CR domains (also referred to as “CR-specific antibodies”) are expected to exhibit higher selectivity for particular CR-containing proteins. The uses of the antibodies that are selective for particular CR-containing proteins or receptors are dictated by the function of the CR-containing proteins or receptors. CR-specific antibodies thus provide a means of modifying and exploiting specific LDLR, or other CR-containing proteins, in vivo.

Antibodies of the invention preferably bind one CR-containing protein (or a subset of CR-containing proteins) with substantially greater affinity than another member of the CR-containing protein family, e.g. at least 1.5-fold, 2-fold, 2.5-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 7-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold or higher affinity, and preferably bind to a CR-containing protein (or a subset) with substantially greater affinity than at least 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, or 8 other members of the family. In a related aspect, the antibodies may be specific for a CR domain within a CR containing protein described herein. Said CR-specific antibodies of the invention preferably bind a CR domain in a CR-containing protein (or a subset of CR-containing proteins) with substantially greater affinity than another CR domain found in a related member of the CR-containing protein family. In one aspect, antibodies of the invention are specific for at least one of the CR domains set out in SEQ ID NO: 69-91.

Antibodies contemplated by the invention include full length antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies), antibody fragments that can bind antigen (e.g., Fab′, F′(ab)₂, Fv, single chain antibodies, diabodies, complementarity determining region (CDR) fragments), and recombinant peptides comprising the forgoing as long as they exhibit the desired biological activity.

In addition to RAP variants alone, the invention contemplates oligomeric combinations of RAP domains or variants of RAP domains, or combinations of RAP variants and CR-specific antibodies that comprise novel binding and effector functions. A fusion system has been created for combining RAP d3 sequences with the same or differing LRP2 receptor selectivities into single proteins. The internally triplicated structure of RAP, and the ability of each of the three related domains to associate independently with CR domains, is leveraged in this application. Using one native and one engineered restriction site, the RAP coding sequence has been divided into the three, previously defined domains. Each domain comprises approximately 100 amino acids with a molecular mass of approximately 10 kD. Domain 1 (or d1) consists of amino acids 1-94 of the mature sequence of Genbank Accession No. P30533; domain 2 (or d2) consists of amino acids 95-198; and domain 3 (or d3) consists of amino acids 199-319. This configuration allows convenient swapping of domains to create novel homotrimeric and heterotrimeric domain arrays using both wild-type and mutant domain sequences. Wild-type RAP itself is bifunctional, with d1 and d3 likely bridging CR pairs that act as binding sites for, among other ligands, uPA-PAI-1 and alpha-2-macroglobulin, respectively. Mutant d3 fusions are designed to bridge different CR pairs within and between CR pair-containing proteins. In the former case, bridging will result in higher affinity complexes and greater inhibition of the binding of other ligands. In the latter case, bridging will result in cross-linking of receptors and subsequent down-regulation by endocytosis or by denial of access to the ligand binding domains for other ligands. The power of multivalency in the interactions between CR sequences and their ligands is illustrated both by RAP domains d1 and d3, which each bind two, adjacent, CR modules, and by HRV2, which binds to increasingly longer VLDLR CR3 concatamers with increasingly larger affinities. In preferred embodiments, engineered RAP d3 variants are combined so that the resulting oligomeric arrays possess unique binding specificities and biological effects. Thus, the invention contemplates that variants of RAP domains include polypeptides comprising 2 or more variants of RAP d1, comprising 2 or more variants of RAP d2, comprising 2 or more variants of RAP d3, comprising a variant of RAP d1 and variant of RAP d3 but lacking RAP d2, comprising 2 or more variants of RAP d1 together with 2 or more variants of RAP d2 or RAP d3 in various combinations (e.g. d1-d3, d1-d3-d3, d1-d1-d3, d1-d1-d3-d3, d1-d3-d1-d3, d1-d3-d1-d3-d1, d3, d1-d2-d1, d2-d2-d3, d3-d2-d3, d2-d3-d2-d3-d2-d3, etc), including consecutive repeats of the same sequence or alternating sequences, comprising multiple variants of RAP d1 and d2 in various combinations, or comprising multiple variants of RAP d2 and d3 in various combinations. The various combinations may be contiguous or separated by peptide linkers that display the domains in a 3-dimensional configuration that allows the domains to bind different CR pairs within the same CR-containing protein or to bind CR pairs of different CR-containing proteins.

In addition to LRP2-selective RAP variants, CR-specific antibodies and combinations of RAP variants, the invention contemplates a conjugate comprising such LRP2-selective RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies and a diagnostic or therapeutic agent. In one embodiment, the polypeptide and diagnostic or therapeutic agent are linked through a linker. In a further embodiment, said linker is a peptide linker. In another embodiment, the conjugate comprising the polypeptide of the invention is transcytosed in vivo. In exemplary embodiments, the therapeutic agent linked to the polypeptide of the invention is selected from the group consisting of a glial cell-derived neuronal growth factor (GDNF), brain-derived neuronal growth factor (BDNF), neuronal growth factor (NGF), or other neural growth factors known in the art, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 10 [Homo sapiens] ADAM10, or other proteases acting on APP or Abeta, MESD (a chaperone protein for LRP5/6 that is required for transport of the receptors to cell surfaces), cancer chemotherapeutic agents, protease inhibitors, pro-apoptotic molecules, autoimmune antigens or lysosomal enzymes.

In a second aspect, the invention contemplates a method of delivering the diagnostic or therapeutic agent to a particular tissue of a subject comprising administering a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody conjugated to a diagnostic or therapeutic agent to said subject in need thereof. In one embodiment, the diagnostic or therapeutic agent conjugated to a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody is delivered to a specific tissue by transcytosis across epithelial or endothelial barriers. In a related embodiment, the agent is delivered across the blood-brain barrier. In a further embodiment, the subject is a human suffering from a neurological disease including but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Amylotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, other demyelination related disorders, a central nervous system cancer, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, stroke or cerebral ischemia, plaque sclerosis, cerebral vasculitis, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, Tourette's syndrome, Guillain Barre syndrome, Wilson disease, Pick's disease, neuroinflammatory disorders, encephalitis, encephalomyelitis or meningitis of viral, fungal or bacterial origin, or other central nervous system infections, prion diseases, cerebellar ataxias, cerebellar degeneration, spinocerebellar degeneration syndromes, Friedreichs ataxia, ataxia telangiectasia, spinal damyotrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, dystonia, muscle spasticity, tremor, retinitis pigmentosa, senile dementia, subcortical dementia, arteriosclerotic dementia, AIDS-associated dementia, or other dementias, striatonigral degeneration, mitochondrial encephalo-myopathies, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, lysosomal storage disorders with central nervous system involvement, leukodystrophies, urea cycle defect disorders, hepatic encephalopathies, renal encephalopathies, metabolic encephalopathies, porphyria, poisonings with neurotoxic compounds, radiation-induced brain damage, or psychiatric disorders such as psychosis, anxiety, depression, attention deficits, memory disorders, cognitive disorders, appetite disorders, obesity, addiction, appetence, or drug dependence. The invention further provides a method of delivering a therapeutic protein to a lysosomal compartment in a cell within a particular tissue of a subject, comprising contacting said cell with an effective amount of a composition comprising said therapeutic enzyme conjugated to the polypeptide of the invention. In one embodiment, the subject is suffering from a lysosomal storage disease (LSD).

In a related embodiment, the invention contemplates a method of reducing CR-containing protein-associated tumorigenic or metastatic effects comprising administering one or more antibodies that selectively binds to the tumorigenic CR-containing protein. Such tumorigenic CR-containing proteins include, but are not limited to, LRP5, LRP6, FDC-8D6 and the matriptases. Such CR-specific antibodies diminish the tumorigenic effects associated with the target CR-containing protein by interfering with the CR functions directly, for example by blocking binding or active sites, or by targeting tissues that overexpress these CR-containing proteins with anti-tumor drugs attached to RAP or RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies. For example, tissues that overexpress matriptase include carcinomas, for example ovarian, cervical, prostate, breast, lung, colon or gastric carcinomas. In yet another embodiment, the invention contemplates a method of treating osteoporosis or other diseases associated with reduced osteoblast and/or increased osteoclast activity, comprising administering antibodies that selectively bind LRP5 and thereby inhibit factors that antagonize osteoblast differentiation and bone deposition as well as promote osteoclast activity.

In a related aspect, the invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody conjugated to a diagnostic or therapeutic agent in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.

In a third aspect, the present invention features a method to produce RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies and conjugates in amounts which enable using compositions comprising such RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies and conjugates therapeutically. The invention also provides a nucleic acid that encodes any of the foregoing polypeptides of the invention. Vectors comprising such nucleic acids, host cells containing such nucleic acids or vectors, and methods of producing such polypeptides comprising the steps of culturing the host cells in suitable culture medium and isolating the polypeptide from said host cells or culture medium are also provided.

In a fourth aspect, the invention provides a method of screening for a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody that has relatively higher binding affinity for a receptor or protein selected from the group consisting of LDLR (P01130), LRP1 (P98157), LRP1B (Q9NZR2), LRP2 (P98164), LRP3 (O75074), LRP4 (O75096), LRP5 (O75197), LRP6 (O75581), FDC-D86 (CD320), LRP8 (Q14114), Sortilin (Q92673), LRP10 (Q7Z4F1), LRP11 (Q86VZ4), LRP12 (Q9Y561), VLDLR (P98155), TADG-15 (ST14, Q8WVC1), TMPS3 (P57727), TMPS4 (Q9NRS4), TMPS6 (Q8IU80), Q6ICC2, Q6PJ72, Q76B61, Q7RTY8, Q7Z7K9, Q86YD5, Q8NAN7, Q8NBJ0, Q8WW88, Q96NT6, Q9BYE1, Q9BYE2, Q9NPF0 and corin (Q8IZR7). In any particular complement-type repeat (CR), there is a characteristic position A and position C within the A×cB×C×D motif of the calcium-binding loop. In a CR pair, the second CR of the pair also has a characteristic position A and position C that are denoted as A′ and C′. FIGS. 1-2 show the relative location of positions A and C in exemplary CR pairs. It is contemplated that any of the CR domains described in the Figures, Tables or Examples herein may be utilized in this screening method. In one embodiment, the invention contemplates a method of screening for RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies with a relatively higher affinity for a particular receptor or protein of interest in comparison with any other protein, comprising the steps of: (a) generating a candidate RAP variant or CR-specific antibody, (b) measuring binding of the candidate RAP variant or CR-specific antibody to at least two repeated CR domains from a CR-containing protein, wherein the CR pairs are identified by a combination of amino acids at position A, C A′ and C′ of the A×cB×C×D motif within each CR pair that does not exist in any other CR pair of another CR-containing protein. In one embodiment, the two repeated CR domains contain a combination of amino acids at positions A, C, A′, C′ that are found in less than 10% of CR pairs derived from all the CR pairs in the proteome of an animal.

Other features and advantages of the invention will become apparent from the following detailed description. It should be understood, however, that the detailed description and the specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the invention, are given by way of illustration only, because various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 is a representative illustration of a complement-type repeat, and is based on the sequence of the seventh complement-type repeat of the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1 CR7, PDB 1J8E), as determined by Simonovic et al. (43), showing the surface of the calcium-binding loop formed by residues at positions marked A, B, C, D. Calcium is represented as a sphere.

FIG. 2 shows an alignment of A×cB×C×D motifs from selected CR sequences. All sequences (SEQ ID NO: 63-68) fold into conserved LDL receptor-like modules with bound calcium, as defined in the Structural Classification of Proteins database (SCOP, scop.berkeley.edu), despite absence of sequence conservation at positions A and C.

FIG. 3 shows an alignment of CR sequences selected for binding analysis and RAP mutant or CR-antibody selection. The specific pairs and triplets used are indicated by brackets on the left. The panning substrate (LRP2 CR89) is indicated by the red (lighter colored) bracket. The A×cB×C×D motif within the alignment is indicated, with positions A and C for each CR sequence underlined. The text string concatenation of amino acids at A, C, A′, and C′ for each CR pair are indicated on the right. Amino acids in shading are identical to the predominant amino acid at the aligned position; amino acids in bold are homologous to the predominant amino acid at the aligned position. Sequences were aligned with Clustal W (44) and formatted with BOXSHADE.

FIG. 4 shows an SDS-PAGE analysis of CR proteins. Purified, refolded proteins were denatured in SDS loading buffer in the presence or absence of 2 mM DTT. Treated samples were resolved in 12% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels as described in Methods. Gels were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Each pair of lanes is labeled at the bottom with the associated CR protein tested. Molecular weight marker sizes are indicated. Typical results are shown. Abbreviations: L1 is LRP1; L2 is LRP2; L6 is LRP6; M is MAT (matriptase, ST14); V is VLDLR; YVWR=LRP2 CR89; YVWD=LRP2 CR89R1088D; YDWR=LRP2 CR89 V1047D; YDWD=LRP2 CR89 V1047D R1088D; WVWR=LRP2 CR89 Y1042W; WDWR=LRP2 CR89 Y1042W V1047D; WVWD=LRP2 CR89 Y1042W R1088D; WDWD=LRP2 CR89 Y1042W V 1047D R1088D.

FIG. 5 depicts binding of RAP d3 to selected CR proteins. FIG. 5A shows binding isotherms of wild-type RAP with canonical and non-canonical CR pairs.

FIG. 5B shows a separate experiment measuring binding of RAP d3 to additional CR domains using a dilution series of RAP d3 prepared from 100-1.25 nM.

FIG. 6 depicts binding of RAP phage and RAPv2A phage to LRP2 CR89. Equal amounts of phage were incubated in single wells coated with LRP2 CR89 in the presence or absence of 50 mM EDTA. Wells were washed and bound phage recovered as described in Methods. Y-axis values represent recovered titers for an aliquot of the eluted phage.

FIGS. 7A and 7B depict binding of RAP d3, RAPv2A d3 and intermediate sequence variants to LRP2 CR89 and LRP1 CR3-5. FIG. 7A illustrates binding of RAP d3 mutants and RAPv2A d3 revertants to LRP2 CR89. FIG. 7B illustrates binding of RAP d3 mutants and RAPv2A d3 revertants to LRP1 CR3-5. Data were plotted and fitted by non-linear regression with the assumption of a single binding site (GraphPad Prism). K_(d) values with standard deviations were derived from the regression analysis.

Table 1 shows data for binding of RAP d3 and RAP v2 (RAP v2A) variants to LRP1 CR3-5 and LRP2 CR89. NF indicates that binding could not be measured or that data could not be reliably fit using non-linear regression with the assumption of a single binding site. Percent of maximum binding is the ratio of the OD at the highest concentration tested for each ligand and the highest OD measured for all such ligands at that concentration.

FIG. 8 shows binding of RAPv2A d3 and RAP d3 to LRP2 CR89 variants. Abbreviations used in the figure: LRP2 CR89 Y1042W (WVWR), LRP2 CR89 V1047D (YDWR), LRP2 CR89R1088D (YVWD), LRP2 CR89 V1047D R1088D (YDWD), LRP2 CR89 Y1042W V1047D R1088D (WDWD), LRP2 CR89 Y1042W V1047D (WDWR), LRP2 CR89 Y1042W R1088D (WVWD).

Table 2 shows data for binding of RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 to LRP2 CR89 variants. NF indicates that binding could not be measured or that data could not be reliably fit using non-linear regression with the assumption of a single binding site. Percent of maximum binding is the ratio of the OD at the highest concentration tested for each ligand and the highest OD measured for all such ligands at that concentration.

Table 3 shows RAP d3 and RAPv2A variant sequences isolated by panning mutant phage libraries on CR pairs. Only variable positions are shown. Amino acid numbering corresponds with mature RAP. Variant name (d3), CR pair used for affinity-selection (CR), apparent dissociation constant (Kd) for complex between variant and target CR pair (when determined), and amino acid identities at variable positions are shown.

FIG. 9 shows a comparison of binding of wild-type RAP d3 and RAP v2A to CR pairs. The abbreviation “Mat CR”, refers to CR pairs derived from the ST14 matriptase protein.

FIG. 10 shows the reducing (left) and non-reducing (right) Western blots of RAP-GDNF (higher band) and GDNF (lower band) demonstrating that the fusion is a disulfide-linked homodimer.

FIG. 11 shows the binding of RAP-GDNF to GFRα by solid phase assay.

FIG. 12 shows the immunoprecipitation of Ret following treatment of SK—N—SH cells with RAP-GDNF and GFRα, followed by detection with anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies.

FIG. 13 shows the immunoprecipitation of a RAP-GDNF/GFRα/phospho-Ret complex using anti-RAP-agarose beads. Immunoprecipitates were eluted in SDS-PAGE loading buffer, resolved by electrophoresis, blotted to PVDF and probed with either an anti-phosphotyrosine (FIG. 13A) or an anti-GFR-1 antibody (FIG. 13B).

FIG. 14A shows that both GDNF and RAP-GDNF induce neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells.

FIG. 14B shows the dose-response of PC12 neurite outgrowth with GDNF and RAP-GDNF concentration.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The invention relates to compositions comprising mutational variants of the alpha-2-macroglobulin/low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR)-related protein-associated protein 1 (receptor-associated protein, RAP, Uniprot accession P30533, Pfam accession numbers PF06400 and PF06401) that selectively bind to LRP2 and CR-specific antibodies that selectively bind to members of the LDLR and transmembrane serine protease families, or other CR-containing proteins. The invention further contemplates a system for isolating such variants or antibodies based on screening polypeptide libraries against unique CR sequence determinants from the protein of interest. CR-specific agents have potential pharmaceutical applications based on two general properties of the target receptors: First, a number of the receptors have roles in the establishment and progression of disease states. Reagents that selectively bind to such receptors, therefore, may be used to alter the behavior of the receptors and the pathophysiological effects, which they support. Second, a number of the receptors have unique tissue distributions. Reagents that selectively bind to such receptors, therefore, may be used to selectively carry other drug substances to those tissues in which a targeted receptor is predominantly expressed. The invention also contemplates the use of such compositions in the prevention, management and treatment of disease, including but not limited to cellular proliferative diseases, such as neoplastic diseases, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hormonal abnormality diseases, degenerative diseases, diseases of aging, diseases of the central nervous system (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, hyperlipidemias), psychiatric diseases and conditions (e.g., schizophrenia, mood disorders such as depression and anxiety), infectious diseases, autoimmune diseases, enzyme deficiency diseases, lysosomal storage diseases such as those described above, and the like.

A. DEFINITIONS

Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The following references provide one of skill with a general definition of many of the terms used in this invention: Singleton, et al., DICTIONARY OF MICROBIOLOGY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY (2d ed. 1994); THE CAMBRIDGE DICTIONARY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (Walker ed., 1988); THE GLOSSARY OF GENETICS, 5TH ED., R. Rieger, et al. (eds.), Springer Verlag (1991); and Hale and Marham, THE HARPER COLLINS DICTIONARY OF BIOLOGY (1991).

Each publication, patent application, patent, and other reference cited herein is incorporated by reference in its entirety to the extent that it is not inconsistent with the present disclosure.

It is noted here that as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.

As used herein, the following terms have the meanings ascribed to them unless specified otherwise.

“Brain tumors and other neoplasia in or around the brain” as used herein includes both primary tumors and/or metastases that develop in or around the brain. It may also mean metastases of brain tumors that migrate elsewhere in the body, but remain responsive to (i.e. targetable by) RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies or RAP variants or antibodies conjugated with chemotherapeutic agents. Many types of such tumors and neoplasia are known. Primary brain tumors include glioma, meningioma, neurinoma, pituitary adenoma, medulloblastoma, craniopharyngioma, hemangioma, epidermoid, sarcoma and others. Fifty percent of all intracranial tumors are intracranial metastasis. As used herein, tumors and neoplasia may be associated with the brain and neural tissue, or they may be associated with the meninges, skull, vasculature or any other tissue of the head or neck. Such tumors are generally solid tumors, or they are diffuse tumors with accumulations localized to the head. Tumors or neoplasia for treatment according to the invention may be malignant or benign, and may have been treated previously with chemotherapy, radiation and/or other treatments.

The term “effective amount” means a dosage sufficient to produce a desired result on a health condition, pathology, and disease of a subject or for a diagnostic purpose. The desired result may comprise a subjective or objective improvement in the recipient of the dosage. “Therapeutically effective amount” refers to that amount of an agent effective to produce the intended beneficial effect on health.

“Small organic molecule” refers to organic molecules of a size comparable to those organic molecules generally used in pharmaceuticals. The term excludes organic biopolymers (e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, etc.). Preferred small organic molecules range in size up to about 5,000 Da, up to about 2,000 Da, or up to about 1,000 Da.

A “subject” of diagnosis or treatment is a human or non-human animal, including a mammal or a primate.

“Treatment” refers to prophylactic treatment or therapeutic treatment or diagnostic treatment.

A “prophylactic” treatment is a treatment administered to a subject who does not exhibit signs of a disease or exhibits only early signs for the purpose of decreasing the risk of developing pathology. The conjugate compounds or antibodies of the invention may be given as a prophylactic treatment to reduce the likelihood of developing a pathology or to minimize the severity of the pathology, if developed.

A “therapeutic” treatment is a treatment administered to a subject who exhibits signs or symptoms of pathology for the purpose of diminishing or eliminating those signs or symptoms. The signs or symptoms may be biochemical, cellular, histological, functional, subjective or objective. The conjugate compounds of the invention may be given as a therapeutic treatment or for diagnosis.

“Diagnostic” means identifying the presence or nature of a pathologic condition. Diagnostic methods differ in their specificity and selectivity. While a particular diagnostic method may not provide a definitive diagnosis of a condition, it suffices if the method provides a positive indication that aids in diagnosis.

“Pharmaceutical composition” refers to a composition suitable for pharmaceutical use in subject animal, including humans and mammals. A pharmaceutical composition, for example, comprises a pharmacologically effective amount of a RAP variant polypeptide conjugated to an active agent or a CR-specific antibody, optionally conjugated to an active agent, and also comprises a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier. A pharmaceutical composition encompasses a composition comprising the active ingredient(s), and the inert ingredient(s) that make up the carrier, as well as any product which results, directly or indirectly, from combination, complexation or aggregation of any two or more of the ingredients, or from dissociation of one or more of the ingredients, or from other types of reactions or interactions of one or more of the ingredients. Accordingly, the pharmaceutical compositions of the present invention encompass any composition made by admixing a compound of the present invention and a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

“Pharmaceutically acceptable carrier” refers to any of the standard pharmaceutical carriers, buffers, and excipients, such as a phosphate buffered saline solution, 5% aqueous solution of dextrose, and emulsions, such as an oil/water or water/oil emulsion, and various types of wetting agents and/or adjuvants. Suitable pharmaceutical carriers and formulations are described in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 19th Ed. (Mack Publishing Co., Easton, 1995). Preferred pharmaceutical carriers depend upon the intended mode of administration of the active agent. Typical modes of administration include enteral (e.g., oral) or parenteral (e.g., subcutaneous, intramuscular, intravenous or intraperitoneal injection; or topical, transdermal, or transmucosal administration). A “pharmaceutically acceptable salt” is a salt that can be formulated into a compound for pharmaceutical use including, e.g., metal salts (sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, etc.) and salts of ammonia or organic amines.

The term “unit dosage form,” as used herein, refers to physically discrete units suitable as unitary dosages for human and animal subjects, each unit containing a predetermined quantity of compounds of the present invention calculated in an amount sufficient to produce the desired effect in association with a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, carrier or vehicle. The specifications for the novel unit dosage forms of the present invention depend on the particular conjugate employed and the effect to be achieved, and the pharmacodynamics associated with each compound in the host.

“Modulate,” as used herein, refers to the ability to alter, by increase or decrease (e.g., to act as an antagonist or agonist).

“Increasing relative delivery” as used herein refers to the effect whereby the accumulation at the intended delivery site (e.g., brain, lysosome) of a RAP variant-conjugated active agent or CR-specific antibody is increased relative to the accumulation of the unconjugated active agent.

“Therapeutic index” refers to the dose range (amount and/or timing) above the minimum therapeutic amount and below an unacceptably toxic amount.

“Equivalent dose” refers to a dose, which contains the same amount of active agent.

“Polynucleotide” refers to a polymer composed of nucleotide units. Polynucleotides include naturally occurring nucleic acids, such as deoxyribonucleic acid (“DNA”) and ribonucleic acid (“RNA”) as well as nucleic acid analogs. Nucleic acid analogs include those which include non-naturally occurring bases, nucleotides that engage in linkages with other nucleotides other than the naturally occurring phosphodiester bond or which include bases attached through linkages other than phosphodiester bonds. Thus, nucleotide analogs include, for example and without limitation, phosphorothioates, phosphorodithioates, phosphorotriesters, phosphoramidates, boranophosphates, methylphosphonates, chiral-methyl phosphonates, 2-O-methyl ribonucleotides, peptide-nucleic acids (PNAs), and the like. Such polynucleotides can be synthesized, for example, using an automated DNA synthesizer. The term “nucleic acid” typically refers to large polynucleotides. The term “oligonucleotide” typically refers to short polynucleotides, generally no greater than about 50 nucleotides. It will be understood that when a nucleotide sequence is represented by a DNA sequence (i.e., A, T, G, C), this also includes an RNA sequence (i.e., A, U, G, C) in which “U” replaces “T.”

“cDNA” refers to a DNA that is complementary or identical to an mRNA, in either single stranded or double stranded form.

Conventional notation is used herein to describe polynucleotide sequences: the left-hand end of a single-stranded polynucleotide sequence is the 5′-end; the left-hand direction of a double-stranded polynucleotide sequence is referred to as the 5′-direction. The direction of 5′ to 3′ addition of nucleotides to nascent RNA transcripts is referred to as the transcription direction. The DNA strand having the same sequence as an mRNA is referred to as the “coding strand”; sequences on the DNA strand having the same sequence as an mRNA transcribed from that DNA and which are located 5′ to the 5′-end of the RNA transcript are referred to as “upstream sequences”; sequences on the DNA strand having the same sequence as the RNA and which are 3′ to the 3′ end of the coding RNA transcript are referred to as “downstream sequences.”

“Complementary” refers to the topological compatibility or matching together of interacting surfaces of two polynucleotides. Thus, the two molecules can be described as complementary, and furthermore, the contact surface characteristics are complementary to each other. A first polynucleotide is complementary to a second polynucleotide if the nucleotide sequence of the first polynucleotide is identical to the nucleotide sequence of the polynucleotide binding partner of the second polynucleotide. Thus, the polynucleotide whose sequence 5′-TATAC-3′ is complementary to a polynucleotide whose sequence is 5′-GTATA-3′.

A “Complement-repeat” or “CR”, also known as a low-density lipoprotein receptor class A domain (LDL-A, Pfam), is a member of a family of protein domains defined by six cysteines and a cluster of acidic amino acids, among other features. A number of complement-repeats have been found to fold into a defined structure termed the LDL receptor-like module (Structural Classification of Proteins, SCOP). CR domains constitute the ligand-binding determinant of many receptors, including receptors belonging to the LDLR. A linear sequence of amino acids within each CR, with the motif A×cB×C×D, where c is a conserved cysteine, x is any amino acid, and B and D are either aspartate, glutamate or asparagine, has been demonstrated to participate in calcium binding and in the binding of ligands. Immediately adjacent pairs of particular CR domains have been demonstrated to bind to RAP. Amino acids at positions A and C in both of the two CR domains of a RAP-binding CR pair (A, C, A′ and C′) have been demonstrated to participate in RAP binding.

A nucleotide sequence is “substantially complementary” to a reference nucleotide sequence if the sequence complementary to the subject nucleotide sequence is substantially identical to the reference nucleotide sequence.

“Encoding” refers to the inherent property of specific sequences of nucleotides in a polynucleotide, such as a gene, a cDNA, or an mRNA, to serve as templates for synthesis of other polymers and macromolecules in biological processes having either a defined sequence of nucleotides (i.e., rRNA, tRNA and mRNA) or a defined sequence of amino acids and the biological properties resulting therefrom. Thus, a gene encodes a protein if transcription and translation of mRNA produced by that gene produces the protein in a cell or other biological system. Both the coding strand, the nucleotide sequence of which is identical to the mRNA sequence and is usually provided in sequence listings, and non-coding strand, used as the template for transcription, of a gene or cDNA can be referred to as encoding the protein or other product of that gene or cDNA. Unless otherwise specified, a “nucleotide sequence encoding an amino acid sequence” includes all nucleotide sequences that are degenerate versions of each other and that encode the same amino acid sequence. Nucleotide sequences that encode proteins and RNA may include introns.

“Recombinant polynucleotide” refers to a polynucleotide having sequences that are not naturally joined together. An amplified or assembled recombinant polynucleotide may be included in a suitable vector, and the vector can be used to transform a suitable host cell. A host cell that comprises the recombinant polynucleotide is referred to as a “recombinant host cell.” The gene is expressed in the recombinant host cell to produce, e.g., a “recombinant polypeptide.” A recombinant polynucleotide may serve a non-coding function (e.g., promoter, origin of replication, ribosome-binding site, etc.) as well.

“Expression control sequence” refers to a nucleotide sequence in a polynucleotide that regulates the expression (transcription and/or translation) of a nucleotide sequence operatively linked thereto. “Operatively linked” refers to a functional relationship between two parts in which the activity of one part (e.g., the ability to regulate transcription) results in an action on the other part (e.g., transcription of the sequence). Expression control sequences can include, for example and without limitation, sequences of promoters (e.g., inducible or constitutive), enhancers, transcription terminators, a start codon (i.e., ATG), splicing signals for introns, and stop codons.

“Expression vector” refers to a vector comprising a recombinant polynucleotide comprising expression control sequences operatively linked to a nucleotide sequence to be expressed. An expression vector comprises sufficient cis-acting elements for expression; other elements for expression can be supplied by the host cell or in vitro expression system. Expression vectors include all those known in the art, such as cosmids, plasmids (e.g., naked or contained in liposomes) and viruses that incorporate the recombinant polynucleotide.

“Amplification” refers to any means by which a polynucleotide sequence is copied and thus expanded into a larger number of polynucleotide molecules, e.g., by reverse transcription, polymerase chain reaction, and ligase chain reaction.

“Primer” refers to a polynucleotide that is capable of specifically hybridizing to a designated polynucleotide template and providing a point of initiation for synthesis of a complementary polynucleotide. Such synthesis occurs when the polynucleotide primer is placed under conditions in which synthesis is induced, i.e., in the presence of nucleotides, a complementary polynucleotide template, and an agent for polymerization such as DNA polymerase. A primer is typically single-stranded, but may be double-stranded. Primers are typically deoxyribonucleic acids, but a wide variety of synthetic and naturally occurring primers are useful for many applications. A primer is complementary to the template to which it is designed to hybridize to serve as a site for the initiation of synthesis, but need not reflect the exact sequence of the template. In such a case, specific hybridization of the primer to the template depends on the stringency of the hybridization conditions. Primers can be labeled with, e.g., chromogenic, radioactive, or fluorescent moieties and used as detectable moieties.

“Probe,” when used in reference to a polynucleotide, refers to a polynucleotide that is capable of specifically hybridizing to a designated sequence of another polynucleotide. A probe specifically hybridizes to a target complementary polynucleotide, but need not reflect the exact complementary sequence of the template. In such a case, specific hybridization of the probe to the target depends on the stringency of the hybridization conditions. Probes can be labeled with, e.g., chromogenic, radioactive, or fluorescent moieties and used as detectable moieties.

A first sequence is an “antisense sequence” with respect to a second sequence if a polynucleotide whose sequence is the first sequence specifically hybridizes with a polynucleotide whose sequence is the second sequence.

“Hybridizing specifically to” or “specific hybridization” or “selectively hybridize to”, refers to the binding, duplexing, or hybridizing of a nucleic acid molecule preferentially to a particular nucleotide sequence under stringent conditions when that sequence is present in a complex mixture (e.g., total cellular) DNA or RNA.

The term “stringent conditions” refers to conditions under which a probe will hybridize preferentially to its target subsequence, and to a lesser extent to, or not at all to, other sequences. “Stringent hybridization” and “stringent hybridization wash conditions” in the context of nucleic acid hybridization experiments such as Southern and Northern hybridizations are sequence dependent, and are different under different environmental parameters. An extensive guide to the hybridization of nucleic acids is found in Tijssen (1993) Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology—Hybridization with Nucleic Acid Probes part I chapter 2 “Overview of principles of hybridization and the strategy of nucleic acid probe assays”, Elsevier, N.Y. Generally, highly stringent hybridization and wash conditions are selected to be about 5° C. lower than the thermal melting point (Tm) for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH. The Tm is the temperature (under defined ionic strength and pH) at which 50% of the target sequence hybridizes to a perfectly matched probe. Very stringent conditions are selected to be equal to the Tm for a particular probe.

An example of stringent hybridization conditions for hybridization of complementary nucleic acids which have more than 100 complementary residues on a filter in a Southern or northern blot is 50% formalin with 1 mg of heparin at 42° C., with the hybridization being carried out overnight. An example of highly stringent wash conditions is 0.15 M NaCl at 72° C. for about 15 minutes. An example of stringent wash conditions is a 0.2×SSC wash at 65° C. for 15 minutes (see, Sambrook et al. for a description of SSC buffer). Often, a high stringency wash is preceded by a low stringency wash to remove background probe signal. An example medium stringency wash for a duplex of, e.g., more than 100 nucleotides, is 1×SSC at 45° C. for 15 minutes. An example low stringency wash for a duplex of, e.g., more than 100 nucleotides, is 4-6×SSC at 40° C. for 15 minutes. In general, a signal to noise ratio of 2× (or higher) than that observed for an unrelated probe in the particular hybridization assay indicates detection of a specific hybridization.

“Polypeptide” refers to a polymer composed of amino acid residues, related naturally occurring structural variants, and synthetic non-naturally occurring analogs thereof linked via peptide bonds, related naturally occurring structural variants, and synthetic non-naturally occurring analogs thereof. Synthetic polypeptides can be synthesized, for example, using an automated polypeptide synthesizer. The term “protein” typically refers to large polypeptides. The term “peptide” typically refers to short polypeptides.

Conventional notation is used herein to portray polypeptide sequences: the left-hand end of a polypeptide sequence is the amino-terminus; the right-hand end of a polypeptide sequence is the carboxyl-terminus.

1) Alanine (A), Serine (S), Threonine (T);

2) Aspartic acid (D), Glutamic acid (E);

3) Asparagine (N), Glutamine (Q);

4) Arginine (R), Lysine (K);

5) Isoleucine (I), Leucine (L), Methionine (M), Valine (V); and

6) Phenylalanine (F), Tyrosine (Y), Tryptophan (W).

“Allelic variant” refers to any of two or more polymorphic forms of a gene occupying the same genetic locus. Allelic variations arise naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations can be silent (no change in the encoded polypeptide) or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequences. “Allelic variants” also refer to cDNAs derived from mRNA transcripts of genetic allelic variants, as well as the proteins encoded by them.

“RAP variant” refers to any of two or more polymorphic forms of alpha-2-macroglobulin/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-associated protein 1 (RAP), Uniprot accession P30533, Pfam accession numbers PF06400 and PF06401). Variants differ in the composition of their amino acid sequences based on one or more mutations involving substitution of one or more amino acids for other amino acids. Substitutions can be conservative or non-conservative based on the physico-chemical or functional relatedness of the amino acid that is being replaced and the amino acid replacing it. RAP variants can be substantially identical or substantially homologous to RAP or a domain of RAP (e.g., d1, d2 or d3).

“Selectivity” or “binding selectivity”, refers to differences in the affinity of a ligand for different receptors. A ligand is selective for a particular receptor if it binds that receptor with an affinity that is at least 3-fold greater than other receptors. For example, RAP binds to LRP1, LRP1B, LRP2, Sortilin, apoER2 and VLDLR with almost identical affinities. Therefore, RAP is not selective for one of these receptors over another. However, while RAP binds strongly to LRP1, LRP1B, LRP2, Sortilin, apoER2 and VLDLR, with dissociation constants of less than 5 nM, it binds only weakly to LDLR, LRP5 and LRP6, with affinities that are at least 10-fold lower than for LRP1. Therefore, RAP is selective for LRP1, LRP1B, LRP2, Sortilin, apoER2 and VLDLR relative to LDLR, LRP5 and LRP6. HRV2 coat protein binds strongly to VLDLR but does not bind to other LDLR. Therefore, HRV2 coat protein shows selectivity in its binding, with a preference for VLDLR over other LDLR. Reelin binds to apoER2 and VLDLR but not to other LDLR. Therefore, reelin is selective for apoER2 and VLDLR over other LDLR.

The terms “identical” or “percent identity,” in the context of two or more polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences, refer to two or more sequences or subsequences that are the same or have a specified percentage of nucleotides or amino acid residues that are the same, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using one of the following sequence comparison algorithms or by visual inspection.

The phrase “substantially homologous” or “substantially identical” in the context of two nucleic acids or polypeptides, generally refers to two or more sequences or subsequences that have at least 40%, 60%, 80%, 90%, 95%, 98% nucleotide or amino acid residue identity, when compared and aligned for maximum correspondence, as measured using one of the following sequence comparison algorithms or by visual inspection. Preferably, the substantial identity exists over a region of the sequences that is at least about 50 residues in length, more preferably over a region of at least about 100 residues, and most preferably the sequences are substantially identical over at least about 150 residues. In a most preferred embodiment, the sequences are substantially identical over the entire length of either or both comparison biopolymers.

For sequence comparison, typically one sequence acts as a reference sequence, to which test sequences are compared. When using a sequence comparison algorithm, test and reference sequences are input into a computer, subsequence coordinates are designated, if necessary, and sequence algorithm program parameters are designated. The sequence comparison algorithm calculates the percent sequence identity for the test sequence(s) relative to the reference sequence, based on the designated program parameters.

Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted, e.g., by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman, Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch, J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970), by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:2444 (1988), by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package, Genetics Computer Group, 575 Science Dr., Madison, Wis.), or by visual inspection.

One example of a useful algorithm is PILEUP. PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments to show relationship and percent sequence identity. It also plots a tree or dendogram showing the clustering relationships used to create the alignment. PILEUP uses a simplification of the progressive alignment method of Feng and Doolittle, J. Mol. Evol. 35:351-360 (1987). The method used is similar to the method described by Higgins and Sharp, CABIOS 5:151-153 (1989). The program can align up to 300 sequences, each of a maximum length of 5,000 nucleotides or amino acids. The multiple alignment procedure begins with the pairwise alignment of the two most similar sequences, producing a cluster of two aligned sequences. This cluster is aligned to the next most related sequence or cluster of aligned sequences. Two clusters of sequences are aligned by a simple extension of the pairwise alignment of two individual sequences. The final alignment is achieved by a series of progressive, pairwise alignments. The program is run by designating specific sequences and their amino acid or nucleotide coordinates for regions of sequence comparison and by designating the program parameters. For example, a reference sequence can be compared to other test sequences to determine the percent sequence identity relationship using the following parameters: default gap weight (3.00), default gap length weight (0.10), and weighted end gaps. Another algorithm that is useful for generating multiple alignments of sequences is Clustal W (Thompson et al. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673-4680, 1994).

Another example of algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST algorithm, which is described in Altschul et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215:403-410 (1990). Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold. These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, M=5, N=−4, and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff and Henikoff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915, 1989).

In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin and Altschul, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 90:5873-5787, 1993). One measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered similar to a reference sequence if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.1, more preferably less than about 0.01, and most preferably less than about 0.001.

A further indication that two nucleic acid sequences or polypeptides are substantially identical is that the polypeptide encoded by the first nucleic acid is immunologically cross reactive with the polypeptide encoded by the second nucleic acid, as described below. Thus, a polypeptide is typically substantially identical to a second polypeptide, for example, where the two peptides differ only by conservative substitutions. Another indication that two nucleic acid sequences are substantially identical is that the two molecules hybridize to each other under stringent conditions, as described herein.

“Substantially pure” or “isolated” means an object species is the predominant species present (i.e., on a molar basis, more abundant than any other individual macromolecular species in the composition), and a substantially purified fraction is a composition wherein the object species comprises at least about 50% (on a molar basis) of all macromolecular species present. Generally, a substantially pure composition means that about 80% to 90% or more of the macromolecular species present in the composition is the purified species of interest. The object species is purified to essential homogeneity (contaminant species cannot be detected in the composition by conventional detection methods) if the composition consists essentially of a single macromolecular species. Solvent species, small molecules (<500 Daltons), stabilizers (e.g., BSA), and elemental ion species are not considered macromolecular species for purposes of this definition. In some embodiments, the conjugates of the invention are substantially pure or isolated. In some embodiments, the conjugates of the invention, or a CR-specific antibody of the invention are substantially pure or isolated with respect to the macromolecular starting materials used in their synthesis. In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition of the invention comprises a substantially purified or isolated conjugate of a RAP variant polypeptide and the active agent, or a substantially purified or isolated CR-specific antibody admixed with one or more pharmaceutically acceptable excipient.

“Naturally-occurring” as applied to an object refers to the fact that the object can be found in nature. For example, a polypeptide or polynucleotide sequence that is present in an organism (including viruses) that can be isolated from a source in nature and which has not been intentionally modified by man in the laboratory is naturally-occurring.

“Detecting” refers to determining the presence, absence, or amount of an analyte in a sample, and can include quantifying the amount of the analyte in a sample or per cell in a sample.

“Detectable moiety” or a “label” refers to a composition detectable by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, or chemical means. For example, useful labels include ³²P, ³⁵S, fluorescent dyes, electron-dense reagents, enzymes (e.g., as commonly used in an ELISA), biotin-streptavidin, dioxigenin, haptens and proteins for which antisera or monoclonal antibodies are available, or nucleic acid molecules with a sequence complementary to a target. The detectable moiety often generates a measurable signal, such as a radioactive, chromogenic, or fluorescent signal, that can be used to quantitate the amount of bound detectable moiety in a sample. The detectable moiety can be incorporated in or attached to a primer or probe either covalently, or through ionic, van der Waals or hydrogen bonds, e.g., incorporation of radioactive nucleotides, or biotinylated nucleotides that are recognized by streptavadin. The detectable moiety may be directly or indirectly detectable. Indirect detection can involve the binding of a second directly or indirectly detectable moiety to the detectable moiety. For example, the detectable moiety can be the ligand of a binding partner, such as biotin, which is a binding partner for streptavadin, or a nucleotide sequence, which is the binding partner for a complementary sequence, to which it can specifically hybridize. The binding partner may itself be directly detectable, for example, an antibody may be itself labeled with a fluorescent molecule. The binding partner also may be indirectly detectable, for example, a nucleic acid having a complementary nucleotide sequence can be a part of a branched DNA molecule that is in turn detectable through hybridization with other labeled nucleic acid molecules. (See, e.g., PD. Fahrlander and A. Klausner, Bio/Technology (1988) 6:1165.) Quantitation of the signal is achieved by, e.g., scintillation counting, densitometry, or flow cytometry.

“Linker” refers to a molecule that joins two other molecules, either covalently, or through ionic, van der Waals or hydrogen bonds, e.g., a nucleic acid molecule that hybridizes to one complementary sequence at the 5′ end and to another complementary sequence at the 3′ end, thus joining two non-complementary sequences.

B. LDLR

“LDLR” refers to members of the low-density lipoprotein receptor family including the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1). LRP1 is a large protein of 4525 amino acids (600 kDa), which is cleaved by furin to produce two subunits of 515-(alpha) kD and 85-(β) kDa that remain non-covalently bound. LRP is expressed on most tissue types, but is primarily found in the liver. Other members of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor family include LDL-R (132 kDa); LRP2 (megalin, gp330); LRP/LRP1 and LRP1B (600 kDa); VLDL-R (130 kDa); LRP5; LRP6; apoER-2 (LRP-8, 130 kDa); Mosaic LDL-R (LR11, 250 KDa); and other members such as LRP3, LRP6, and LRP-7. Characteristic features of the family include cell-surface expression; extracellular ligand binding domain repeats (D×SDE); a requirement of Ca++ for ligand binding; binding of RAP and apoE; EGF precursor homology domain repeats (YWTD); a single membrane spanning region; internalization signals in the cytoplasmic domain (FDNPXY); and receptor mediated endocytosis of various ligands. Some members of the family, including LRP1, LRP5, LRP6, apoER2 and VLDLR, participate in signal transduction pathways.

LDLR ligands refer to a number of molecules that are known to bind LDLR. These molecules include, for instance, lactoferrin, RAP, lipoprotein lipase, apoE, Factor VIII, beta-amyloid precursor, alpha-2-macroglobulin, thrombospondin 2 MMP-2 (matrix metalloproteinase-2), MPP-9-TIMP-1 (tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase-1); uPA (urokinase plasminogen activator):PAI-I (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1):uPAR (uPA receptor); and tPA (tissue plasminogen activator):PAI-1 uPAR.

LRP1 is believed to be a multifunctional receptor. A binding repeat, resembling those found in the LDL receptor, is the molecular principle for the ability to bind a variety of ligands that were previously thought to be unrelated. These include the ligands described in the previous paragraph in addition to: Pseudomonas exotoxin A, human rhinovirus, lactoferrin and the receptor associated protein (RAP). See, Meilinger et al., FEBS Lett, 360:70-74 (1995). LRP1 is has the GenBank Accession No.: X 13916 and SwissProt Primary Accession No.: Q07954. Alternative names for the LRP1 gene/protein include: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 [precursor], LRP, Alpha-2-macroglobulin receptor, A2MR, Apolipoprotein E receptor, ApoER, CD91, LRP1 or A2MR.

LDLR bind to a wide variety of extracellular ligands through conserved protein domains within the N-terminal extracellular domain, or ectodomain, of each receptor. These domains include the complement-type repeat (CR, or low-density lipoprotein receptor domain class A, 1d1-a), the EGF-like repeat and the YWTD, or beta-propeller, domain. The representation and arrangement of each domain varies with each particular LDLR. The CR domains are responsible for association with most of the ligands that have been identified. The CR sequence specifies a conserved fold, termed the LDL receptor-like module (SCOP terminology). Each approximately 36 amino acid CR contains six cysteines that form three intramolecular cystines in a 1-3, 2-5, 4-6 configuration, and a calcium ion bound within one lobe of a bilobate loop (FIG. 1). As demonstrated by structural studies on the LDLR (with seven CR domains), LRP1 (CR3, 7 and 8), VLDLR (CR3, bound to human rhinovirus 2) and the quail TVA receptor (single CR), the CR fold represents a well-defined, compact structure. Apart from the cystines, other amino acids within the CR serving important structural roles include four acidic residues that participate in calcium chelation and a pair of conserved hydrophobic residues (usually F and I) that pack under and behind one lobe of the calcium-binding loop. The consensus calcium-binding loop sequence is A×cB×C×D (FIG. 1), with the side chains contributed by positions A, B, C and D forming one surface of the loop, and c representing one of the cystine-forming cysteines (number 4). As demonstrated in crystal structures, aspartate (carboxylate), asparagine (carboxamide) or glutamate (carboxylate) at positions B and D directly participate in calcium chelation through their side chains (the other two acidic side chains that participate directly in calcium chelation are contributed by positions approximately 6 residues C-terminal to position D). Main chain carbonyls for positions A and C also participate in calcium chelation, while the side chains for these residues project away from the loop surface into the solvent (FIG. 1). Importantly, the previously mentioned structural data show that the CR fold structure is tolerant of amino acid substitution at a number of positions, including A and C (FIGS. 1 and 2).

Members of the LDLR family are well expressed on capillary endothelium and on CNS cell types including neurons and astrocytes (e.g., LDL receptor, Megalin, LRP1). The LDL receptor family endocytose bound ligand and have been demonstrated to transcytose ligands across polarized epithelial cells in the kidney, thyroid and across capillary endothelial cells in the brain. LDLR therefore comprises a pool of compositionally and functionally related receptors expressed at different levels in different tissues. In some embodiments, this invention uses CR-specific antibodies which preferentially bind and thereby target members of this and other protein families (and particularly cells, tissues, and organs expressing a member of these families). Examples include the VLDLR on muscle tissue, LRP1B on neuronal tissue, Megalin on both kidney and neuronal tissue and LRP1 on vascular smooth muscle tissue.

C. RECEPTOR-ASSOCIATED PROTEIN (RAP)

An endoplasmic reticular chaperone protein, the receptor-associated protein (RAP), binds to CR sequences within most LDLR. RAP assists in the folding of LDLR within the secretory pathway and antagonizes binding of all other known ligands to LDLR (Bu, (2001) Int Rev Cytol 209, 79-116). Despite the lack of detailed structural information on RAP, the association of RAP with the CR fold has been extensively characterized by a combination of receptor binding assays, calorimetry, and mutagenesis (Andersen, et al., (2001) Biochemistry 40, 15408-15417; Andersen, et al., (2000) J Biol Chem 275, 21017-21024; Migliorini, et al., (2003) J Biol Chem 278, 17986-17992; Neels, et al., (1999) J Biol Chem 274, 31305-31311; Horn, et al., (1997) J Biol Chem 272, 13608-13613)). The polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences of RAP are set out in SEQ ID NOs: 1 and 2, respectively.

RAP is comprised of an array of three weakly homologous domains (Obermoeller, et al., (1997) J Biol Chem 272, 10761-10768). Each of these domains (d1, d2 and d3) has been shown to bind with varying affinity to pairs of immediately adjacent CR sequences within the LDLR ectodomains. Each of the effects of full-length RAP on LDLR, including facilitation of folding and inhibition of the binding of most other ligands (except α-2-macroglobulin), are recapitulated by RAPd3 alone. RAP d3 comprises amino acids 200-323 of mature Uniprot P30533 and amino acids 234-357 of precursor Uniprot P30533. RAPd3, which also has the highest affinity for CR pairs, and RAPd1, with lower affinity, both show a strong preference for those CR sequences in which aromatic and acidic residues occupy positions A and C, respectively, in the calcium-binding loop. More specifically, both RAP domains prefer tryptophan and aspartate at these sites. This shared preference exists despite significant differences in the binding thermodynamics of d1 and d3, suggesting, in turn, significant differences in the formation of complexes between CR pairs and each domain (Andersen, et al., (2001) Biochemistry 40, 15408-15417). Substitution of serine for tryptophan in position A of the second CR sequence of a particular CR pair (LRP1 CR5 and CR6, or LRP1CR56) reduces the affinity for RAPd3 by at least three orders of magnitude; RAPd1 binding to the same CR is undetectable after this substitution. In contrast, substitution of one unconserved position that does not contribute to the surface of the calcium-binding loop has been shown to have no effect on binding of RAP or RAP subdomains.

The second ligand-binding domain of human LRP1 is composed of eight consecutive CR units. Each of the seven possible adjacent CR pairs have been individually expressed and assayed for binding to RAPd3 (Andersen, et al., (2000) J Biol Chem 275, 21017-21024). Except for the last pair (CR9 and CR10), which contains non-preferred residues at A and C in the second CR, all pairs bind with similar affinity (1-5 nM) to RAP. A comparison of the sequences of these pairs can be used to identify those positions to which RAP is indifferent. The power of the comparison can be increased by including CR pairs from the VLDLR that have also been shown to bind to RAP with high affinity (Mikhailenko, et al., (1999) J Cell Sci 112 (Pt 19), 3269-3281). Subtracting from consideration all previously described conserved structural residues, as well as positions A and C, only one additional position shows strong, though not strict, conservation. This site separates positions B and C in the calcium-binding loop and represents the point of maximum loop curvature. A preference for glycine here is not unexpected based on the high representation of this amino acid at peptide bends, a result of the unique main-chain flexibility of this residue. This analysis suggests that, apart from conserved positions required for the structural integrity of the CR fold, unconserved positions A and C play the largest role in complex formation with RAP.

Crystal structures of the LDLR CR array complexed to its own beta-propeller at low pH, as well as of the VLDLR CR3 complexed to the capsid of human rhinovirus 2 (HRV2), provide some information on the nature of the association between key positions in the CR pair, and complementary positions within RAP (11, 45). It appears as though the tryptophan at position A and the acidic amino acid at position C act in concert to bind a single lysine within the ligand sequence (beta-propeller or HRV2 capsid protein). The tryptophan packs hydrophobically against the aliphatic portion of the lysine side-chain, while the carboxylate forms a salt-bridge with the protonated amine of the same. The existence of two A/C pairs within each CR pair and two critical lysines within each RAP d3 indicates that two such interactions might define the CR-RAP complex. Additional stabilization of the complex may come from association of the two basic “patches” within d3 and the negatively charged calcium-binding sites of each CR. This model has recently been confirmed (Fisher, et al., (2006) Mol Cell 22:277-83). Substitution of other types of interactions for the primary interaction may permit secondary interactions to remain the same, or only slightly altered. Such a substitution would allow for production of RAP mutants that bind to CR pairs in which A and C have amino acids other than tryptophan and aspartate/glutamate, respectively. Since a number of such unique CR pairs are found in all LDLR and other CR-containing proteins, RAP mutants with unusual A/C preferences are likely to bind to particular receptors selectively.

A comparison of all CR pairs within the Pfam database (maintained by Washington University, St. Louis, Mo.) reveals that there is a wide diversity of substitutions at both key positions A and C and that CR pairs with unique combinations of amino acids at these positions (A, C, A′, C′) can be found in all human LDLR, including LDLR (PO1130), LRP1 (P98157), LRP1B (Q9NZR2), LRP2 (P98164), LRP3 (075074), LRP4 (075096), LRP5 (075197), LRP6 (075581), LRP8 (014114), Sortilin (Q92673), LRP10 (Q7Z4F1), LRP11 (Q86VZ4), LRP12 (Q9Y561), and VLDLR (P98155). Other CR-containing proteins include the family of transmembrane serine proteases, such as: TADG-15 (ST14/Matriptase/MT-SP1), Q6ICC2 (Uniprot accession number), Q6PJ72, Q76B61, Q7RTY8, Q7Z7K9, Q86YD5, Q8NAN7, Q8NBJ0, Q8WW88, Q96NT6, Q9BYE1, Q9BYE2, Q9NPF0 and corin. The protein designations reflect the receptors Uniprot database designation.

D. ANTIBODIES

The invention contemplates antibodies specific for the CR containing proteins described herein. Antibodies of the invention that are “specific” for, “specifically bind” or are “selective” for an antigen preferably bind one CR-containing protein (or a subset of CR-containing proteins) with substantially greater affinity than another member of the CR-containing protein family, e.g. at least 1.5-fold, 2-fold, 2.5-fold, 3-fold, 4-fold, 5-fold, 7-fold, 10-fold, 20-fold or higher affinity, and preferably bind to one CR-containing protein (or a subset) with substantially greater affinity than all other members of the family. Antibodies of the invention may be characterized by an affinity (Kd) for the target CR-containing protein of at least 10−4 M, 10−5 M, 10−6 M, 10−7 M, 10−8 M, 10−9 M, 10−10 M, or 10−11 M or higher affinity. Such affinities may be readily determined using conventional techniques, such as by using a BIAcore instrument or by radioimmunoassay using radiolabeled target antigen. Affinity data may be analyzed, for example, by the method of Scatchard et al., Ann N.Y. Acad. Sci., 51:660 (1949).

The term “antibody” is used in the broadest sense and includes fully assembled antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies), antibody fragments that can bind antigen (e.g., Fab′, F′(ab)₂, Fv, single chain antibodies, diabodies), and recombinant peptides comprising the forgoing as long as they exhibit the desired biological activity. Multimers or aggregates of intact molecules and/or fragments, including chemically derivatized antibodies, are contemplated. Antibodies of any isotype class or subclass, including IgG, IgM, IgD, IgA, and IgE, IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4, IgA1 and IgA2, are contemplated. Different isotypes have different effector functions; for example, IgG1 and IgG3 isotypes have antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) activity.

An “immunoglobulin” or “native antibody” is a tetrameric glycoprotein composed of two identical pairs of polypeptide chains (two “light” and two “heavy” chains). The amino-terminal portion of each chain includes a “variable” (“V”) region of about 100 to 110 or more amino acids primarily responsible for antigen recognition. Within this variable region, the “hypervariable” region or “complementarity determining region” (CDR) consists of residues 24-34 (L1), 50-56 (L2) and 89-97 (L3) in the light chain variable domain and 31-35 (H1), 50-65 (H2) and 95-102 (H3) in the heavy chain variable domain as described by Kabat et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. (1991)] and/or those residues from a hypervariable loop (i.e., residues 26-32 (L1), 50-52 (L2) and 91-96 (L3) in the light chain variable domain and 26-32 (H1), 53-55 (H2) and 96-101 (H3) in the heavy chain variable domain as described by [Chothia et al., J. Mol. Biol. 196: 901-917 (1987)]. The carboxy-terminal portion of each chain defines a constant region primarily responsible for effector function.

The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical except for possible naturally occurring mutations or alternative post-translational modifications that may be present in minor amounts, whether produced from hybridomas or recombinant DNA techniques. Nonlimiting examples of monoclonal antibodies include murine, chimeric, humanized, or human antibodies, or variants or derivatives thereof. Humanizing or modifying antibody sequence to be more human-like is described in, e.g., Jones et al., Nature 321:522 525 (1986); Morrison et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., U.S.A., 81:6851 6855 (1984); Morrison and Oi, Adv. Immunol., 44:65 92 (1988); Verhoeyer et al., Science 239:1534 1536 (1988); Padlan, Molec. Immun. 28:489 498 (1991); Padlan, Molec. Immunol. 31(3):169 217 (1994); and Kettleborough, C. A. et al., Protein Eng. 4(7):773 83 (1991); Co, M. S., et al. (1994), J. Immunol. 152, 2968-2976); Studnicka et al. Protein Engineering 7: 805-814 (1994); each of which is incorporated herein by reference. One method for isolating human monoclonal antibodies is the use of phage display technology. Phage display is described in e.g., Dower et al., WO 91/17271, McCafferty et al., WO 92/01047, and Caton and Koprowski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:6450-6454 (1990), each of which is incorporated herein by reference. Another method for isolating human monoclonal antibodies uses transgenic animals that have no endogenous immunoglobulin production and are engineered to contain human immunoglobulin loci. See, e.g., Jakobovits et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:2551 (1993); Jakobovits et al., Nature, 362:255-258 (1993); Bruggermann et al., Year in Immuno., 7:33 (1993); WO 91/10741, WO 96/34096, WO 98/24893, or U.S. patent application publication nos. 20030194404, 20030031667 or 20020199213; each incorporated herein by reference.

Antibody fragments may be produced by recombinant DNA techniques or by enzymatic or chemical cleavage of intact antibodies. “Antibody fragments” comprise a portion of an intact full length antibody, preferably the antigen binding or variable region of the intact antibody, and include multispecific (bispecific, trispecific, etc.) antibodies formed from antibody fragments. Nonlimiting examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2, Fv [variable region], domain antibody (dAb) [Ward et al., Nature 341:544-546, 1989], complementarity determining region (CDR) fragments, single-chain antibodies (scPv) [Bird et al., Science 242:423-426, 1988, and Huston et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:5879-5883, 1988, optionally including a polypeptide linker; and optionally multispecific, Gruber et al., J. Immunol. 152: 5368 (1994)], single chain antibody fragments, diabodies [EP 404,097; WO 93/11161; and Hollinger et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90:6444-6448 (1993)], triabodies, tetrabodies, minibodies [Olafsen, et al., Protein Eng Des Sel. 2004 April; 17(4):315-23], linear antibodies [Zapata et al., Protein Eng., 8(10):1057-1062 (1995)]; chelating recombinant antibodies [Neri et al., J Mol Biol. 246:367-73, 1995], tribodies or bibodies [Schoonjans et al., J Immunol. 165:7050-57, 2000; Willems et al., J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 786:161-76, 2003], intrabodies [Biocca, et al., EMBO J. 9:101-108, 1990; Colby et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 101:17616-21, 2004], nanobodies [Cortez-Retamozo et al., Cancer Research 64:2853-57, 2004], small modular immunopharmaceuticals (SMIPs) [WO03/041600, U.S. Patent publication 20030133939 and US Patent Publication 20030118592], an antigen-binding-domain immunoglobulin fusion protein, a camelized antibody [Desmyter et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276:26285-90, 2001; Ewert et al., Biochemistry 41:3628-36, 2002; U.S. Patent Publication Nos. 20050136049 and 20050037421], a VHH containing antibody, or variants or derivatives thereof, and polypeptides that contain at least a portion of an immunoglobulin that is sufficient to confer specific antigen binding to the polypeptide, such as a CDR sequence, as long as the antibody retains the desired biological activity.

The term “variant” when used in connection with antibodies refers to polypeptide sequence of an antibody that contains at least one amino acid substitution, deletion, or insertion in the variable region or the portion equivalent to the variable region, provided that the variant retains the desired binding affinity or biological activity. In addition, the antibodies of the invention may have amino acid modifications in the constant region to modify effector function of the antibody, including half-life or clearance, ADCC and/or CDC activity. Such modifications can enhance pharmacokinetics or enhance the effectiveness of the antibody in treating cancer, for example. See Shields et al., J. Biol. Chem., 276(9):6591-6604 (2001), incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In the case of IgG1, modifications to the constant region, particularly the hinge or CH2 region, may increase or decrease effector function, including ADCC and/or CDC activity. In other embodiments, an IgG2 constant region is modified to decrease antibody-antigen aggregate formation. In the case of IgG4, modifications to the constant region, particularly the hinge region, may reduce the formation of half-antibodies.

The term “derivative” when used in connection with antibodies refers to antibodies covalently modified by conjugation to therapeutic or diagnostic agents, labeling (e.g., with radionuclides or various enzymes), covalent polymer attachment such as pegylation (derivatization with polyethylene glycol) and insertion or substitution by chemical synthesis of non-natural amino acids. Derivatives of the invention will retain the binding properties of underivatized molecules of the invention. Conjugation of cancer-targeting antibodies to cytotoxic agent, for example, radioactive isotopes (e.g., I131, I125, Y90 and Re186), chemotherapeutic agents, or toxins, may enhance destruction of cancerous cells.

E. RAP VARIANTS

Previous studies have suggested that wild-type RAP will not have physiologically relevant affinity for non-canonical CR pairs.

The invention contemplates RAP variants having differential binding affinity for LRP2. Random and site-directed mutagenesis of RAP indicates that there may be a few residues that contribute disproportionately to the affinity of the ligand complex with the CR pair (Migliorini, et al., (2003) J Biol Chem 278, 17986-17992). In particular, lysines at positions 256 and 270 in RAPd3 have been found to be important for binding of this domain to LRP1. Also important are two, discrete, ten amino acid basic regions centered on positions 205 and 285, respectively (Melman, et al., (2001) J Biol Chem 276, 29338-29346). These observations are consistent with there being a limited set of residues, a “hot-spot”, that contribute the majority of binding energy between RAP and CR pairs, a phenomenon observed in other protein-protein interfaces (Li, et al, (2005) Structure (Camb) 13, 297-307; Halperin, et al., (2004) Structure (Camb) 12, 1027-1038; Gao, et al., (2004) J Mol Model (Online) 10, 44-54; Dwyer, et al., (2001) Biochemistry 40, 13491-13500; DeLano, (2002) Curr Opin Struct Biol 12, 14-20; Bogan, et al., (1998) J Mol Biol 280, 1-9; Clackson, et al., (1995) Science 267, 383-386).

i. LRP2-Selective RAP Variants and LRP2-Selective Antibodies

LRP2 has been shown to be expressed on brain capillary endothelium and to mediate transport of apoJ into the parenchyma of the brain (Lundgren, et al., (1997) J Histochem Cytochem 45, 383-392; Zlokovic, et al., (1996) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93, 4229-4234; Shayo, et al., (1997) Life Sci 60, PL115-118). RAP variants that selectively bind to LRP2 with greater affinity than other LDLR are expected to have enhanced distribution to the brain. For these reasons, RAP variants and anti-CR antibodies that selectively bind to LRP2 and fusions containing drugs conjugated to such RAP variants or antibodies are expected to have enhanced distribution to the brain. For example, GDNF has been demonstrated to promote survival and growth of nigrostriatal neurons in subjects with Parkinson's disease (Lin, et al., (1993) Science 260, 1130-1132). GDNF does not cross into the brain from the vasculature. Fusions of LRP2-selective RAP variants to GDNF would be expected to increase the distribution of GDNF to the brain.

ii. VLDLR-Selective Binding Moieties

VLDLR has been shown to be expressed on brain capillary endothelium and to mediate transport of lipoprotein lipase across the endothelium of the aorta (Wyne, et al., (1996) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 16, 407-415; Obunike, et al., (2001) J Biol Chem 276, 8934-8941). Binding moieties, such as antibodies, that selectively bind to VLDLR and fusions containing drugs conjugated to such binding moieties are expected to have enhanced distribution to the brain. VLDLR has also been implicated in foam cell formation by mediating uptake of excess free fatty acids (FFA) into vascular macrophages (Hiltunen, et al., (1998) Circulation 97, 1079-1086; Qu, et al., (2004) J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci 24, 1-4, 8). Binding moieties that selectively bind to VLDLR would be expected to block association of lipoprotein particles with macrophages and inhibit foam cell formation. Such variants would also be expected to limit transfer of FFA from circulating lipoprotein into adipocytes, slowing the progression toward obesity in susceptible subjects (Goudriaan, et al., (2001) Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 21, 1488-1493; Goudriaan, et al. (2004) J Lipid Res 45, 1475-1481; Tacken, et al., (2001) Curr Opin Lipidol 12, 275-279; Yagyu, et al., (2002) J Biol Chem 277, 10037-10043). The high level of expression of VLDLR on the luminal surface of muscle endothelium, along with the low level of expression of VLDLR in liver, would be expected to drive distribution of VLDLR-selectivebinding moieties to muscle tissue after intravenous administration. Molecules with therapeutic effects on muscle tissue could be attached to VLDLR-selective Binding moieties to improve distribution of such molecules to muscle.

iii. Binding Moieties selective for CR-containing proteins

Overexpression of at least three CR-containing proteins, LRP5, LRP6 and ST14 (TADG-15), has been independently associated with increased tumorigenicity or carcinogenesis (Li, et al., (2004) Oncogene 23, 9129-9135; Hoang, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 109, 106-111; Tanimoto, et al., (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-283; Santin, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 112, 14-25; Santin, et al., (2003) Cancer 98, 1898-1904; Tanimoto, et al., (2001) Tumour Biol 22, 104-114). Binding moieties, such as anti-CR-protein antibodies or anti-CR-specific antibodies, that bind to these proteins would be expected to provide a means of diminishing their tumorigenic effects, either by interfering with their functions directly or by targeting tissues that overexpress these proteins with drugs attached to the binding moieties specific for CR-containing proteins. For example, the protease domain adjacent to the CR array in the ectodomain of matriptase (ST14) has been implicated in the enhanced invasiveness and tumorigenicity of cells that overexpress matriptase (ST14). A matriptase-selective binding moiety alone, or fusions between a matriptase-selective binding moiety and a protease inhibitor would be expected to specifically block those effects of matriptase related to its proteolytic activity. LRP6selective binding moieties could be designed to down-regulate LRP6 on tumor cells, either by inducing endocytosis of LRP6 or by interfering with the Wnt signal transduction events mediated by LRP6. Similarly, LRP6-selective binding moieties conjugated to drugs (e.g. cancer chemotherapeutic drugs) or diagnostic agents can be used to target tissues that overexpress LRP6.

Enhanced Wnt signaling through LRP5 has been demonstrated to increase osteoblast differentiation, inhibit osteoclast activity and enhance bone deposition (Westendorf, et al., (2004) Gene 341, 19-39; Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684). This mechanism has been validated with osteoblast-specific APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) knockout mice and with LRP5 mutants that are insensitive to DKK (Dickkopf)-1 and sclerostin-mediated inhibition (Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684; Holmen, et al., (2005) J Biol Chem). LRP5-specific binding moieties that interfere with inhibitor binding, or which enhance Wnt signaling through other means (e.g. stabilizing LRP5 without blocking Wnt binding), would be expected to have similar effects. For example, fusions between binding moieties specific for either of the two LRP5 CR pairs and the beta-propeller chaperone protein Mesd would be expected to interfere with DKK-1-mediated antagonism of Wnt signaling through LRP5 (Hsieh, et al., (2003) Cell 112, 355-367; Herz, et al., (2003) Cell 112, 289-292). These binding moieties specific for CR-containing proteins are further expected to have therapeutic effects in the treatment of osteoporosis or other diseases associated with reduced osteoblast activity and/or increased osteoclast activity.

In more general embodiments, receptor-selective binding moieties, alone or in combination, constitute a means by which receptors might be specifically controlled. There are least four mechanisms by which control could be effected: Competitive blockade of ligand binding by direct association of binding moiety with ligand binding sites, non-competitive blockade of ligand binding by binding moiety-induced allosteric modification of ligand binding sites, clearance of receptors from the cell surface following binding moiety or moiety-fusion-induced cross-linking between the same or different receptors, modification of the targeted receptor or the cell on which the receptor is expressed, or the tissue in which the cell resides, by agents that are attached to binding moieties specific for CR-containing proteins (e.g. proteases, protease inhibitors, glycosidases, radioisotopes, pro-apoptotic agents, toxins, therapeutic molecules (drugs), other receptor binding moieties, etc).

F. CONJUGATES OF RAP VARIANT OR CR-SPECIFIC ANTIBODIES AND ACTIVE AGENT

It is contemplated that RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies may be fused or linked to therapeutic proteins such as glial cell-derived neuronal growth factor (GDNF), brain-derived neuronal growth factor (BDNF), neuronal growth factor (NGF), other neurotrophic factors known to the art, ADAM10, other protease acting on APP or Abeta, MESD, cancer chemotherapeutic agents, protease inhibitors, autoimmune antigens, pro-apoptotic molecules, lysosomal enzymes, DNA or siRNA. It is contemplated that fusion of these agents to RAP variants with improved affinity for LRP2 receptors will facilitate increased transport across the blood-brain barrier and other tissue sites expressing LRP2. In one aspect, it is contemplated that fusion to RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies results in altered tissue distribution of the fusion after intravenous, subcutaneous, intramuscular, intraventricular, intrathecal or intraparenchymal administration of the fusion agent.

It is further provided that fusion to RAP or RAP domain variants or CR-specific antibodies results in alterations in the pharmacological activity of the fusion partner caused by one or more of the following effects: Increased potency, diminished binding to receptors or tissues that are different from the intended target receptor or tissue, increased binding to receptors or tissues that are the intended target receptor or tissue, increased access to receptors or tissues that are the intended target receptor or tissue, altered rates of clearance from the body, and, altered characteristics of the immune response to the protein.

It is further provided that RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies may be conjugated to therapeutic nucleic acids, such as DNA or siRNA, in order to improve the tissue-selective distribution of said nucleic acids and facilitate endocytosis of said nucleic acids into cells (Kim, et al., (2004) Bioconjugate Chemistry 15, 326-332).

A “RAP conjugate”, “ligand-polypeptide conjugate” “chimeric molecule comprising a RAP variant conjugated to an active agent” each refers to a compound attached to an active agent. As used herein, the term “conjugated” means that the therapeutic agent(s) and RAP variant polypeptide or CR-specific antibody are physically linked by, for example, by covalent chemical bonds, physical forces such van der Waals or hydrophobic interactions, encapsulation, embedding, or combinations thereof. In preferred embodiments, the therapeutic agent(s) and the RAP variant polypeptide or CR-specific antibody are physically linked by covalent chemical bonds. As such, preferred chemotherapeutic agents contain a functional group such as an alcohol, acid, carbonyl, thiol or amine group to be used in the conjugation to RAP variant or fragment thereof or CR-specific antibody. Adriamycin is in the amine class and there is also the possibility to link through the carbonyl as well. Paclitaxel is in the alcohol class. Chemotherapeutic agents without suitable conjugation groups may be further modified to add such a group. All these compounds are contemplated in this invention. In the case of multiple therapeutic agents, a combination of various conjugations can be used.

In some embodiments, a covalent chemical bond that may be either direct (no intervening atoms) or indirect (through a linker e.g., a chain of covalently linked atoms) joins the RAP variant or CR-specific antibody and the active agent. In preferred embodiments, the RAP variant or CR-specific antibody and the active agent moiety of the conjugate are directly linked by covalent bonds. In some preferred embodiments, the binding moiety is connected to the active agent moiety of the compound according to the invention by a linker that comprises a covalent bond or a peptide of virtually any amino acid sequence or any molecule or atoms capable of connecting the binding moiety to the active agent moiety.

In some embodiments, the linker comprises a chain of atoms from 1 to about 60, or 1 to 30 atoms or longer, 2 to 5 atoms, 2 to 10 atoms, 5 to 10 atoms, or 10 to 20 atoms long. Similarly, the linker may comprise 2 to 5 molecules, 2 to 10 molecules, 5 to 10 molecules, or 10 to 20 molecules. In some embodiments, the chain atoms are all carbon atoms. In some embodiments, the chain atoms are selected from the group consisting of C, O, N, and S. Chain atoms and linkers may be selected according to their expected solubility (hydrophilicity) so as to provide a more soluble conjugate. In some embodiments, the linker provides a functional group that is subject to enzymatic attack in a lysosome. In some embodiments, the linker provides a functional group which is subject to attack by an enzyme found in the target tissue or organ and which upon attack or hydrolysis severs the link between the active agent moiety and the binding moiety. In some embodiments, the linker provides a functional group that is subject to hydrolysis under the conditions found at the target site (e.g., low pH of a lysosome). A linker may contain one or more such functional groups. In some embodiments, the length of the linker is long enough to reduce the potential for steric hindrance (when an active agent is large) between one or both of the CR-containing protein binding site and the active agent active binding site.

If the linker is a covalent bond or a peptide and the active agent is a polypeptide, the entire conjugate can be a fusion protein. Such peptidyl linkers may be any length. Exemplary linkers are from about 1 to 50 amino acids in length, 5 to 50, or 10 to 30 amino acids in length. Such fusion proteins may be produced by recombinant genetic engineering methods known to one of ordinary skill in the art. In some embodiments, the RAP variant portion of the conjugate is formulated to rapidly degrade to release the active compound. In other embodiments, the linker is subject to cleavage under intracellular, or more preferably, lysosomal environmental conditions to release or separate the active agent portion from the RAP variant polypeptide or CR-specific antibody portion.

The conjugate can comprise one or more active agents linked to the same RAP variant or CR-specific antibody. For example, conjugation reactions may conjugate from 1 to 5, about 5, about 1 to 10, about 5 to 10, about 10 to 20, about 20 to 30, or 30 or more molecules of an active agent to the RAP variant polypeptide or CR-specific antibody. These formulations can be employed as mixtures, or they may be purified into specific stoichiometric formulations. Those skilled in the art are able to determine which format and which stoichiometric ratio is preferred. Further, more than one type of active agent may be linked to the RAP variant polypeptide or CR-specific antibody where delivery of more than one type of an agent to a target site or compartment is desired. A plurality of active agent species may be attached to the same polypeptide e.g., adriamycin-cisplatinum polypeptide conjugates. Thus, the conjugates may consist of a range of stoichiometric ratios and incorporate more than one type of active agent. These, too, may be separated into purified mixtures or they may be employed in aggregate.

The RAP variant or fragment thereof or CR-specific antibody conjugated according to the invention may be modified as desired to enhance its stability or pharmacokinetic properties (e.g., PEGylation). Suitable linkers and their functional groups for conjugation and the synthetic chemical methods readily adaptable for preparing such, are described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 20060029586, herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. See also, for example, Wong, Chemistry Of Protein Conjugation and Cross-Linking (CRC Press 1991); Upeslacis et al., “Modification of Antibodies by Chemical Methods,” in Monoclonal Antibodies: Principles and Applications, Birch et al. (eds.), pages 187-230 (Wiley-Liss, Inc. 1995); Price, “Production and Characterization of Synthetic Peptide-Derived Antibodies,” in Monoclonal Antibodies: Production, Engineering and Clinical Application, Ritter et al. (eds.), pages 60-84 (Cambridge University Press 1995).

The synthesis of these conjugates is efficient and convenient, producing high yields and drugs with enhanced aqueous solubility.

G. ACTIVE AGENTS

Active agents according to the invention include agents that can affect a biological process. Particularly preferred active agents for use in the compounds compositions and methods of the invention are therapeutic agents, including drugs and diagnostic agents. The term “drug” or “therapeutic agent” refers to an active agent that has a pharmacological activity or benefits health when administered in a therapeutically effective amount. Particularly preferred agents are naturally occurring biological agents (e.g., enzymes, proteins, polynucleotides, antibodies, polypeptides, nanoparticles, glyconjugates). In some embodiments, the active agent conjugated to a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody is a molecule, as well as any binding portion or fragment thereof, that is capable of modulating a biological process in a living host.

Examples of drugs or therapeutic agents include substances that are used in the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, treatment or cure of a disease or condition. It is particularly contemplated that the agent is not an agent that causes a disease. Specifically, the agent is not amyloid β protein.

i. Protein Active Agents

The active agent can be a non-protein or a protein. The active agent can be a protein or enzyme or any fragment of such that still retains some, substantially all, or all of the therapeutic or biological activity of the protein or enzyme. In some embodiments, the protein or enzyme is one that, if not expressed or produced or if substantially reduced in expression or production, would give rise to a disease, including but not limited to, lysosomal storage diseases. Preferably, the protein or enzyme is derived or obtained from a human or mouse.

In preferred embodiments of the invention, when the active agent to be conjugated is a protein or enzyme, or fragment thereof possessing a biological activity of the protein or enzyme, the active agent has an amino acid sequence identical to the amino acid sequence to the corresponding portion of the human or mammalian protein or enzyme. In other embodiments, the active agent moiety of the conjugate is a protein or enzyme native to the species of the human or mammal. In other embodiments, the protein or enzyme, or fragment thereof, is substantially homologous (i.e., at least 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, more preferably 98%, or most preferably 99% identical in amino acid sequence over a length of at least 10, 25, 50, 100, 150, or 200 amino acids, or the entire length of the active agent) to a native sequence of the corresponding human or mammal protein or enzyme.

If the compound is a protein, the compound can be an enzyme, or any fragment of an enzyme that still retains some, substantially all, or all of the activity of the enzyme. Preferably, in the treatment of lysosomal storage diseases, the enzyme is an enzyme that is found in a cell that if not expressed or produced or is substantially reduced in expression or production would give rise to a lysosomal storage disease. Preferably, the enzyme is derived or obtained from a human or mouse. Preferably, the enzyme is a lysosomal storage enzyme, such as α-L-iduronidase, iduronate-2-sulfatase, heparan N-sulfatase, α-N— acetylglucosaminidase, arylsulfatase A, galactosylceramidase, acid-alpha-glucosidase, tripeptidyl peptidase, hexosaminidase alpha, acid sphingomyelinase, β-galactosidase, or any other lysosomal storage enzyme.

In some embodiments, therefore, in the treatment of human Lysosomal Storage Diseases (LSDs), the RAP variant- (or CR-specific antibody-) active agent conjugate comprises an active agent protein or enzyme that is deficient in the lysosomes of a subject or patient to be treated. Such enzymes, include for example, alpha-L-iduronidase, iduronate-2-sulfatase, heparan N-sulfatase, alpha-N-acetylglucosaminidase, Arylsulfatase A, Galactosylceramidase, acid-alpha-glucosidase, thioesterase, hexosaminidase A, Acid Spingomyelinase, alpha-galactosidase, or any other lysosomal storage enzyme. A table of lysosomal storage diseases and the proteins deficient therein, which are useful as active agents, follows:

Lysosomal Storage Disease Protein deficiency Mucopolysaccharidosis type I L-Iduronidase Mucopolysaccharidosis type II Hunter syndrome Iduronate-2-sulfatase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA Sanfilippo syndrome Heparan-N-sulfatase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIB Sanfilippo syndrome α-N-Acetylglucosaminidase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIC Sanfilippo syndrome AcetylCoA:N-acetyltransferase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIID Sanfilippo syndrome N-Acetylglucosamine 6-sulfatase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IVA Morquio syndrome Galactose 6-sulfatase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IVB Morquio syndrome β-Galactosidase Mucopolysaccharidosis type VI N-Acetylgalactosamine 4-sulfatase Mucopolysaccharidosis type VII Sly syndrome β-Glucuronidase Mucopolysaccharidosis type IX hyaluronoglucosaminidase Aspartylglucosaminuria Aspartylglucosaminidase Cholesterol ester storage disease/Wolman disease Acid lipase Cystinosis Cystine transporter Danon disease Lamp-2 Fabry disease α-Galactosidase A Farber Lipogranulomatosis/Farber disease Acid ceramidase Fucosidosis α-L-Fucosidase Galactosialidosis types I/II Protective protein Gaucher disease types I/IIIII Gaucher disease Glucocerebrosidase (β-glucosidase) Globoid cell leukodystrophy/Krabbe disease Galactocerebrosidase Glycogen storage disease II/Pompe disease α-Glucosidase GM1-Gangliosidosis types I/II/III β-Galactosidase GM2-Gangliosidosis type I/Tay Sachs disease β-Hexosaminidase A GM2-Gangliosidosis type II Sandhoff disease β-Hexosaminidase A GM2-Gangliosidosis GM2-activator deficiency α-Mannosidosis types I/II α-D-Mannosidase β-Mannosidosis β-D-Mannosidase Metachromatic leukodystrophy Arylsulfatase A Metachromatic leukodystrophy Saposin B Mucolipidosis type I/Sialidosis types I/II Neuraminidase Mucolipidosis types II/III I-cell disease Phosphotransferase Mucolipidosis type IIIC pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy Phosphotransferase γ-subunit Multiple sulfatase deficiency Multiple sulfatases Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, CLN1 Batten disease Palmitoyl protein thioesterase Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, CLN2 Batten disease Tripeptidyl peptidase I Niemann-Pick disease types A/B Niemann-Pick disease Acid sphingomyelinase Niemann-Pick disease type C1 Niemann-Pick disease Cholesterol trafficking Niemann-Pick disease type C2 Niemann-Pick disease Cholesterol trafficking Pycnodysostosis Cathepsin K Schindler disease types I/II Schindler disease α-Galactosidase B Sialic acid storage disease sialic acid transporter

Thus, the lysosomal storage diseases that can be treated or prevented using the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, Mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPS I), MPS II, MPS IIIA, MPS IIIB, Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD), Krabbe, Pompe, Ceroid Lipofuscinosis, Tay-Sachs, Niemann-Pick A and B, and other lysosomal diseases.

Thus, per the above table, for each disease the conjugated agent would preferably comprise a specific active agent enzyme deficient in the disease. For instance, for methods involving MPS I, the preferred compound or enzyme is α-L-iduronidase. For methods involving MPS II, the preferred compound or enzyme is iduronate-2-sulfatase. For methods involving MPS IIIA, the preferred compound or enzyme is heparan N-sulfatase. For methods involving MPS IIIB, the preferred compound or enzyme is α-N-acetylglucosaminidase. For methods involving Metachromatic Leukodystropy (MLD), the preferred compound or enzyme is arylsulfatase A. For methods involving Krabbe, the preferred compound or enzyme is galactosylceramidase. For methods involving Pompe, the preferred compound or enzyme is acid α-glucosidase. For methods involving CLN, the preferred compound or enzyme is tripeptidyl peptidase. For methods involving Tay-Sachs, the preferred compound or enzyme is hexosaminidase alpha. For methods involving Niemann-Pick A and B the preferred compound or enzyme is acid sphingomyelinase.

The RAP variant- (or CR-specific antibody-) active agent conjugate can comprise one or more active agent moieties (e.g., 1 to 10 or 1 to 4 or 2 to 3 moieties). For example, conjugation reactions may conjugate from 1 to 4 or more molecules of alpha-L-iduronidase to a single RAP variant or CR-specific antibody. These formulations can be employed as mixtures, or they may be purified into specific stoichiometric formulations. Those skilled in the art are able to determine which format and which stoichiometric ratio is preferred. Further, one or more different active agents may be linked to any given molecule of a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody to facilitate a more complete degradation of the stored substrates. These conjugated agents may consist of a range of stoichiometric ratios. These, too, may be separated into purified mixtures or they may be employed in aggregate. In exemplary embodiments, the RAP variant is located N-terminally to the LSD enzyme or other active agent coding sequence.

The RAP variant-conjugated active agents can enter or be transported into or end up residing in the lysosomes of a cell within or without the CNS. The rate of passage of the conjugated agent can be modulated by any compound or protein that can modulate LRP2 binding activity. In preferred embodiments, the LRP2 receptor binding affinity of the conjugate is higher than the LRP1 binding affinity. The cell can be from any tissue or organ system affected by the lysosomal storage disease. The cell can be, for instance, an endothelial, epithelial, muscle, heart, bone, lung, fat, kidney, or liver cell. In some embodiments, the cell is preferably a cell found within the BBB. In some embodiments, the cell is a neuron or a brain cell. In other embodiments, the cell is a cell of the periphery or one that is not isolated from the general circulation by an endothelium such as that of the BBB.

ii. Drug Active Agents

Generally, the drug active agent may be of any size. Preferred drugs are small organic molecules that are capable of binding to the target of interest. A drug moiety of the conjugate, when a small molecule, generally has a molecular weight of at least about 50 D, usually at least about 100 D, where the molecular weight may be as high as 500 D or higher, but will usually not exceed about 2000 D.

The drug moiety is capable of interacting with a target in the host into which the conjugate is administered during practice of the subject methods. The target may be a number of different types of naturally occurring structures, where targets of interest include both intracellular and extracellular targets, where such targets may be proteins, phospholipids, nucleic acids and the like, where proteins are of particular interest. Specific proteinaceous targets of interest include, without limitation, enzymes, e.g., kinases, phosphatases, reductases, cyclooxygenases, proteases and the like, targets comprising domains involved in protein-protein interactions, such as the SH2, SH3, PTB and PDZ domains, structural proteins, e.g., actin, tubulin, etc., membrane receptors, immunoglobulins, e.g., IgE, cell adhesion receptors, such as integrins, etc., ion channels, transmembrane pumps, transcription factors, signaling proteins, and the like.

In some embodiments, the active agent or drug has a hydroxyl or an amino group for reacting with the isocyanate reagent or the active agent is chemically modified to introduce a hydroxyl or an amino group for reacting with the isocyanate reagent.

In some embodiments, the active agent or drug comprises a region that may be modified and/or participate in covalent linkage, preferably, without loss of the desired biological activity of the active agent. The drug moieties often comprise cyclical carbon or heterocyclic structures and/or aromatic or polyaromatic structures substituted with one or more of the above functional groups. Also of interest as drug moieties are structures found among biomolecules, proteins, enzymes, polysaccharides, and polynucleic acids, including peptides, saccharides, fatty acids, steroids, purines, pyrimidines, derivatives, structural analogs or combinations thereof.

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to, psychopharmacological agents, such as (1) central nervous system depressants, e.g., general anesthetics (barbiturates, benzodiazepines, steroids, cyclohexanone derivatives, and miscellaneous agents), sedative-hypnotics (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, piperidinediones and triones, quinazoline derivatives, carbamates, aldehydes and derivatives, amides, acyclic ureides, benzazepines and related drugs, phenothiazines, etc.), central voluntary muscle tone modifying drugs (anticonvulsants, such as hydantoins, barbiturates, oxazolidinediones, succinimides, acylureides, glutarimides, benzodiazepines, secondary and tertiary alcohols, dibenzazepine derivatives, valproic acid and derivatives, GABA analogs, etc.), analgesics (morphine and derivatives, oripavine derivatives, morphinan derivatives, phenylpiperidines, 2,6-methane-3-benzazocaine derivatives, diphenylpropylamines and isosteres, salicylates, p-aminophenol derivatives, 5-pyrazolone derivatives, arylacetic acid derivatives, fenamates and isosteres, etc.) and antiemetics (anticholinergics, antihistamines, antidopaminergics, etc.), (2) central nervous system stimulants, e.g., analeptics (respiratory stimulants, convulsant stimulants, psychomotor stimulants), narcotic antagonists (morphine derivatives, oripavine derivatives, 2,6-methane-3-benzoxacine derivatives, morphinan derivatives) nootropics, (3) psychopharmacologicals, e.g., anxiolytic sedatives (benzodiazepines, propanediol carbamates) antipsychotics (phenothiazine derivatives, thioxanthine derivatives, other tricyclic compounds, butyrophenone derivatives and isosteres, diphenylbutylamine derivatives, substituted benzamides, arylpiperazine derivatives, indole derivatives, etc.), antidepressants (tricyclic compounds, MAO inhibitors, etc.), (4) respiratory tract drugs, e.g., central antitussives (opium alkaloids and their derivatives); pharmacodynamic agents, such as (1) peripheral nervous system drugs, e.g., local anesthetics (ester derivatives, amide derivatives), (2) drugs acting at synaptic or neuroeffector junctional sites, e.g., cholinergic agents, cholinergic blocking agents, neuromuscular blocking agents, adrenergic agents, antiadrenergic agents, (3) smooth muscle active drugs, e.g., spasmolytics (anticholinergics, musculotropic spasmolytics), vasodilators, smooth muscle stimulants, (4) histamines and antihistamines, e.g., histamine and derivative thereof (betazole), antihistamines (H1-antagonists, H2-antagonists), histamine metabolism drugs, (5) cardiovascular drugs, e.g., cardiotonics (plant extracts, butenolides, pentadienolids, alkaloids from erythrophleum species, ionophores, adrenoceptor stimulants, etc), antiarrhythmic drugs, antihypertensive agents, antilipidemic agents (clofibric acid derivatives, nicotinic acid derivatives, hormones and analogs, antibiotics, salicylic acid and derivatives), antivaricose drugs, hemostyptics, (6) blood and hemopoietic system drugs, e.g., antianemia drugs, blood coagulation drugs (hemostatics, anticoagulants, antithrombotics, thrombolytics, blood proteins and their fractions), (7) gastrointestinal tract drugs, e.g., digestants (stomachics, choleretics), antiulcer drugs, antidiarrheal agents, (8) locally acting drugs; chemotherapeutic agents, such as (1) anti-infective agents, e.g., ectoparasiticides (chlorinated hydrocarbons, pyrethins, sulfurated compounds), anthelmintics, antiprotozoal agents, antimalarial agents, antiamebic agents, antileiscmanial drugs, antitrichomonal agents, antitrypanosomal agents, sulfonamides, antimycobacterial drugs, antiviral chemotherapeutics, etc., and (2) cytostatics, i.e., antineoplastic agents or cytotoxic drugs, such as alkylating agents, e.g., Mechlorethamine hydrochloride (Nitrogen Mustard, Mustargen, HN2), Cyclophosphamide (Cytovan, Endoxana), Ifosfamide (IFEX), Chlorambucil (Leukeran), Melphalan (Phenylalanine Mustard, L-sarcolysin, Alkeran, L-PAM), Busulfan (Myleran), Thiotepa (Triethylenethiophosphoramide), Carmustine (BiCNU, BCNU), Lomustine (CeeNU, CCNU), Streptozocin (Zanosar) and the like; plant alkaloids, e.g., Vincristine (Oncovin), Vinblastine (Velban, Velbe), Paclitaxel (Taxol), and the like; antimetabolites, e.g., Methotrexate (MTX), Mercaptopurine (Purinethol, 6-MP), Thioguanine (6-TG), Fluorouracil (5-FU), Cytarabine (Cytosar-U, Ara-C), Azacitidine (Mylosar, 5-AZA) and the like; antibiotics, e.g., Dactinomycin (Actinomycin D, Cosmegen), Doxorubicin (Adriamycin), Daunorubicin (duanomycin, Cerubidine), Idarubicin (Idamycin), Bleomycin (Blenoxane), Picamycin (Mithramycin, Mithracin), Mitomycin (Mutamycin) and the like, and other anticellular proliferative agents, e.g., Hydroxyurea (Hydrea), Procarbazine (Mutalane), Dacarbazine (DTIC-Dome), Cisplatin (Platinol) Carboplatin (Paraplatin), Asparaginase (Elspar) Etoposide (VePesid, VP-16-213), Amsarcrine (AMSA, m-AMSA), Mitotane (Lysodren), Mitoxantrone (Novatrone), and the like. Preferred chemotherapeutic agents are those, which in the free form, demonstrate unacceptable systemic toxicity at desired doses. The general systemic toxicity associated with therapeutic levels of such agents may be reduced by their linkage to the RAP variant polypeptide or CR-specific antibody. Particularly preferred are cardiotoxic compounds that are useful therapeutics but are dose limited by cardiotoxicity. A classic example is adriamycin (also known as doxorubicin) and its analogs, such as daunorubicin. Linking RAP or a RAP variant polypeptide or a CR-specific antibody to such drugs may prevent accumulation of the active agent at the heart and associated cardiotoxicity.

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to: Antibiotics, such as: aminoglycosides, e.g., amikacin, apramycin, arbekacin, bambermycins, butirosin, dibekacin, dihydrostreptomycin, fortimicin, gentamicin, isepamicin, kanamycin, micronomcin, neomycin, netilmicin, paromycin, ribostamycin, sisomicin, spectinomycin, streptomycin, tobramycin, trospectomycin; amphenicols, e.g., azidamfenicol, chloramphenicol, florfenicol, and theimaphenicol; ansamycins, e.g., rifamide, rifampin, rifamycin, rifapentine, rifaximin; beta.-lactams, e.g., carbacephems, carbapenems, cephalosporins, cehpamycins, monobactams, oxaphems, penicillins; lincosamides, e.g., clinamycin, lincomycin; macrolides, e.g., clarithromycin, dirthromycin, erythromycin, etc.; polypeptides, e.g., amphomycin, bacitracin, capreomycin, etc.; tetracyclines, e.g., apicycline, chlortetracycline, clomocycline, etc.; synthetic antibacterial agents, such as 2,4-diaminopyrimidines, nitrofurans, quinolones and analogs thereof, sulfonamides, sulfones;

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to: Antifungal agents, such as: polyenes, e.g., amphotericin B, candicidin, dermostatin, filipin, fungichromin, hachimycin, hamycin, lucensomycin, mepartricin, natamycin, nystatin, pecilocin, perimycin; synthetic antifungals, such as allylamines, e.g., butenafine, naftifine, terbinafine; imidazoles, e.g., bifonazole, butoconazole, chlordantoin, chlormidazole, etc., thiocarbamates, e.g., tolciclate, triazoles, e.g., fluconazole, itraconazole, terconazole;

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to: Antihelmintics, such as: arecoline, aspidin, aspidinol, dichlorophene, embelin, kosin, napthalene, niclosamide, pelletierine, quinacrine, alantolactone, amocarzine, amoscanate, ascaridole, bephenium, bitoscanate, carbon tetrachloride, carvacrol, cyclobendazole, diethylcarbamazine, etc.;

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to: Antimalarials, such as: acedapsone, amodiaquin, arteether, artemether, artemisinin, artesunate, atovaquone, bebeerine, berberine, chirata, chlorguanide, chloroquine, chlorprogaunil, cinchona, cinchonidine, cinchonine, cycloguanil, gentiopicrin, halofantrine, hydroxychloroquine, mefloquine hydrochloride, 3-methylarsacetin, pamaquine, plasmocid, primaquine, pyrimethamine, quinacrine, quinidine, quinine, quinocide, quinoline, dibasic sodium arsenate;

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to: Antiprotozoan agents, such as: acranil, timidazole, ipronidazole, ethylstibamine, pentamidine, acetarsone, aminitrozole, anisomycin, nifuratel, timidazole, benzidazole, suramrin, and the like.

Suitable drugs for use as active agents are also listed in: Goodman and Gilman's, The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (9th Ed) (Goodman et al. eds) (McGraw-Hill) (1996); and 1999 Physician's Desk Reference (1998).

Suitable active agents include, but are not limited to: antineoplastic agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,880,161, 5,877,206, 5,786,344, 5,760,041, 5,753,668, 5,698,529, 5,684,004, 5,665,715, 5,654,484, 5,624,924, 5,618,813, 5,610,292, 5,597,831, 5,530,026, 5,525,633, 5,525,606, 5,512,678, 5,508,277, 5,463,181, 5,409,893, 5,358,952, 5,318,965, 5,223,503, 5,214,068, 5,196,424, 5,109,024, 5,106,996, 5,101,072, 5,077,404, 5,071,848, 5,066,493, 5,019,390, 4,996,229, 4,996,206, 4,970,318, 4,968,800, 4,962,114, 4,927,828, 4,892,887, 4,889,859, 4,886,790, 4,882,334, 4,882,333, 4,871,746, 4,863,955, 4,849,563, 4,845,216, 4,833,145, 4,824,955, 4,785,085, 4,684,747, 4,618,685, 4,611,066, 4,550,187, 4,550,186, 4,544,501, 4,541,956, 4,532,327, 4,490,540, 4,399,283, 4,391,982, 4,383,994, 4,294,763, 4,283,394, 4,246,411, 4,214,089, 4,150,231, 4,147,798, 4,056,673, 4,029,661, 4,012,448;

psychopharmacological/psychotropic agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,192,799, 5,036,070, 4,778,800, 4,753,951, 4,590,180, 4,690,930, 4,645,773, 4,427,694, 4,424,202, 4,440,781, 5,686,482, 5,478,828, 5,461,062, 5,387,593, 5,387,586, 5,256,664, 5,192,799, 5,120,733, 5,036,070, 4,977,167, 4,904,663, 4,788,188, 4,778,800, 4,753,951, 4,690,930, 4,645,773, 4,631,285, 4,617,314, 4,613,600, 4,590,180, 4,560,684, 4,548,938, 4,529,727, 4,459,306, 4,443,451, 4,440,781, 4,427,694, 4,424,202, 4,397,853, 4,358,451, 4,324,787, 4,314,081, 4,313,896, 4,294,828, 4,277,476, 4,267,328, 4,264,499, 4,231,930, 4,194,009, 4,188,388, 4,148,796, 4,128,717, 4,062,858, 4,031,226, 4,020,072, 4,018,895, 4,018,779, 4,013,672, 3,994,898, 3,968,125, 3,939,152, 3,928,356, 3,880,834, 3,668,210;

cardiovascular agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,966,967, 5,661,129, 5,552,411, 5,332,737, 5,389,675, 5,198,449, 5,079,247, 4,966,967, 4,874,760, 4,954,526, 5,051,423, 4,888,335, 4,853,391, 4,906,634, 4,775,757, 4,727,072, 4,542,160, 4,522,949, 4,524,151, 4,525,479, 4,474,804, 4,520,026, 4,520,026, 5,869,478, 5,859,239, 5,837,702, 5,807,889, 5,731,322, 5,726,171, 5,723,457, 5,705,523, 5,696,111, 5,691,332, 5,679,672, 5,661,129, 5,654,294, 5,646,276, 5,637,586, 5,631,251, 5,612,370, 5,612,323, 5,574,037, 5,563,170, 5,552,411, 5,552,397, 5,547,966, 5,482,925, 5,457,118, 5,414,017, 5,414,013, 5,401,758, 5,393,771, 5,362,902, 5,332,737, 5,310,731, 5,260,444, 5,223,516, 5,217,958, 5,208,245, 5,202,330, 5,198,449, 5,189,036, 5,185,362, 5,140,031, 5,128,349, 5,116,861, 5,079,247, 5,070,099, 5,061,813, 5,055,466, 5,051,423, 5,036,065, 5,026,712, 5,011,931, 5,006,542, 4,981,843, 4,977,144, 4,971,984, 4,966,967, 4,959,383, 4,954,526, 4,952,692, 4,939,137, 4,906,634, 4,889,866, 4,888,335, 4,883,872, 4,883,811, 4,847,379, 4,835,157, 4,824,831, 4,780,538, 4,775,757, 4,774,239, 4,771,047, 4,769,371, 4,767,756, 4,762,837, 4,753,946, 4,752,616, 4,749,715, 4,738,978, 4,735,962, 4,734,426, 4,734,425, 4,734,424, 4,730,052, 4,727,072, 4,721,796, 4,707,550, 4,704,382, 4,703,120, 4,681,970, 4,681,882, 4,670,560, 4,670,453, 4,668,787, 4,663,337, 4,663,336, 4,661,506, 4,656,267, 4,656,185, 4,654,357, 4,654,356, 4,654,355, 4,654,335, 4,652,578, 4,652,576, 4,650,874, 4,650,797, 4,649,139, 4,647,585, 4,647,573, 4,647,565, 4,647,561, 4,645,836, 4,639,461, 4,638,012, 4,638,011, 4,632,931, 4,631,283, 4,628,095, 4,626,548, 4,614,825, 4,611,007, 4,611,006, 4,611,005, 4,609,671, 4,608,386, 4,607,049, 4,607,048, 4,595,692, 4,593,042, 4,593,029, 4,591,603, 4,588,743, 4,588,742, 4,588,741, 4,582,854, 4,575,512, 4,568,762, 4,560,698, 4,556,739, 4,556,675, 4,555,571, 4,555,570, 4,555,523, 4,550,120, 4,542,160, 4,542,157, 4,542,156, 4,542,155, 4,542,151, 4,537,981, 4,537,904, 4,536,514, 4,536,513, 4,533,673, 4,526,901, 4,526,900, 4,525,479, 4,524,151, 4,522,949, 4,521,539, 4,520,026, 4,517,188, 4,482,562, 4,474,804, 4,474,803, 4,472,411, 4,466,979, 4,463,015, 4,456,617, 4,456,616, 4,456,615, 4,418,076, 4,416,896, 4,252,815, 4,220,594, 4,190,587, 4,177,280, 4,164,586, 4,151,297, 4,145,443, 4,143,054, 4,123,550, 4,083,968, 4,076,834, 4,064,259, 4,064,258, 4,064,257, 4,058,620, 4,001,421, 3,993,639, 3,991,057, 3,982,010, 3,980,652, 3,968,117, 3,959,296, 3,951,950, 3,933,834, 3,925,369, 3,923,818, 3,898,210, 3,897,442, 3,897,441, 3,886,157, 3,883,540, 3,873,715, 3,867,383, 3,873,715, 3,867,383, 3,691,216, 3,624,126;

antimicrobial agents as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,902,594, 5,874,476, 5,874,436, 5,859,027, 5,856,320, 5,854,242, 5,811,091, 5,786,350, 5,783,177, 5,773,469, 5,762,919, 5,753,715, 5,741,526, 5,709,870, 5,707,990, 5,696,117, 5,684,042, 5,683,709, 5,656,591, 5,643,971, 5,643,950, 5,610,196, 5,608,056, 5,604,262, 5,595,742, 5,576,341, 5,554,373, 5,541,233, 5,534,546, 5,534,508, 5,514,715, 5,508,417, 5,464,832, 5,428,073, 5,428,016, 5,424,396, 5,399,553, 5,391,544, 5,385,902, 5,359,066, 5,356,803, 5,354,862, 5,346,913, 5,302,592, 5,288,693, 5,266,567, 5,254,685, 5,252,745, 5,209,930, 5,196,441, 5,190,961, 5,175,160, 5,157,051, 5,096,700, 5,093,342, 5,089,251, 5,073,570, 5,061,702, 5,037,809, 5,036,077, 5,010,109, 4,970,226, 4,916,156, 4,888,434, 4,870,093, 4,855,318, 4,784,991, 4,746,504, 4,686,221, 4,599,228, 4,552,882, 4,492,700, 4,489,098, 4,489,085, 4,487,776, 4,479,953, 4,477,448, 4,474,807, 4,470,994, 4,370,484, 4,337,199, 4,311,709, 4,308,283, 4,304,910, 4,260,634, 4,233,311, 4,215,131, 4,166,122, 4,141,981, 4,130,664, 4,089,977, 4,089,900, 4,069,341, 4,055,655, 4,049,665, 4,044,139, 4,002,775, 3,991,201, 3,966,968, 3,954,868, 3,936,393, 3,917,476, 3,915,889, 3,867,548, 3,865,748, 3,867,548, 3,865,748, 3,783,160, 3,764,676, 3,764,677;

anti-inflammatory agents as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,872,109, 5,837,735, 5,827,837, 5,821,250, 5,814,648, 5,780,026, 5,776,946, 5,760,002, 5,750,543, 5,741,798, 5,739,279, 5,733,939, 5,723,481, 5,716,967, 5,688,949, 5,686,488, 5,686,471, 5,686,434, 5,684,204, 5,684,041, 5,684,031, 5,684,002, 5,677,318, 5,674,891, 5,672,620, 5,665,752, 5,656,661, 5,635,516, 5,631,283, 5,622,948, 5,618,835, 5,607,959, 5,593,980, 5,593,960, 5,580,888, 5,552,424, 5,552,422, 5,516,764, 5,510,361, 5,508,026, 5,500,417, 5,498,405, 5,494,927, 5,476,876, 5,472,973, 5,470,885, 5,470,842, 5,464,856, 5,464,849, 5,462,952, 5,459,151, 5,451,686, 5,444,043, 5,436,265, 5,432,181, RE034918, 5,393,756, 5,380,738, 5,376,670, 5,360,811, 5,354,768, 5,348,957, 5,347,029, 5,340,815, 5,338,753, 5,324,648, 5,319,099, 5,318,971, 5,312,821, 5,302,597, 5,298,633, 5,298,522, 5,298,498, 5,290,800, 5,290,788, 5,284,949, 5,280,045, 5,270,319, 5,266,562, 5,256,680, 5,250,700, 5,250,552, 5,248,682, 5,244,917, 5,240,929, 5,234,939, 5,234,937, 5,232,939, 5,225,571, 5,225,418, 5,220,025, 5,212,189, 5,212,172, 5,208,250, 5,204,365, 5,202,350, 5,196,431, 5,191,084, 5,187,175, 5,185,326, 5,183,906, 5,177,079, 5,171,864, 5,169,963, 5,155,122, 5,143,929, 5,143,928, 5,143,927, 5,124,455, 5,124,347, 5,114,958, 5,112,846, 5,104,656, 5,098,613, 5,095,037, 5,095,019, 5,086,064, 5,081,261, 5,081,147, 5,081,126, 5,075,330, 5,066,668, 5,059,602, 5,043,457, 5,037,835, 5,037,811, 5,036,088, 5,013,850, 5,013,751, 5,013,736, 5,006,542, 4,992,448, 4,992,447, 4,988,733, 4,988,728, 4,981,865, 4,962,119, 4,959,378, 4,954,519, 4,945,099, 4,942,236, 4,931,457, 4,927,835, 4,912,248, 4,910,192, 4,904,786, 4,904,685, 4,904,674, 4,904,671, 4,897,397, 4,895,953, 4,891,370, 4,870,210, 4,859,686, 4,857,644, 4,853,392, 4,851,412, 4,847,303, 4,847,290, 4,845,242, 4,835,166, 4,826,990, 4,803,216, 4,801,598, 4,791,129, 4,788,205, 4,778,818, 4,775,679, 4,772,703, 4,767,776, 4,764,525, 4,760,051, 4,748,153, 4,725,616, 4,721,712, 4,713,393, 4,708,966, 4,695,571, 4,686,235, 4,686,224, 4,680,298, 4,678,802, 4,652,564, 4,644,005, 4,632,923, 4,629,793, 4,614,741, 4,599,360, 4,596,828, 4,595,694, 4,595,686, 4,594,357, 4,585,755, 4,579,866, 4,578,390, 4,569,942, 4,567,201, 4,563,476, 4,559,348, 4,558,067, 4,556,672, 4,556,669, 4,539,326, 4,537,903, 4,536,503, 4,518,608, 4,514,415, 4,512,990, 4,501,755, 4,495,197, 4,493,839, 4,465,687, 4,440,779, 4,440,763, 4,435,420, 4,412,995, 4,400,534, 4,355,034, 4,335,141, 4,322,420, 4,275,064, 4,244,963, 4,235,908, 4,234,593, 4,226,887, 4,201,778, 4,181,720, 4,173,650, 4,173,634, 4,145,444, 4,128,664, 4,125,612, 4,124,726, 4,124,707, 4,117,135, 4,027,031, 4,024,284, 4,021,553, 4,021,550, 4,018,923, 4,012,527, 4,011,326, 3,998,970, 3,998,954, 3,993,763, 3,991,212, 3,984,405, 3,978,227, 3,978,219, 3,978,202, 3,975,543, 3,968,224, 3,959,368, 3,949,082, 3,949,081, 3,947,475, 3,936,450, 3,934,018, 3,930,005, 3,857,955, 3,856,962, 3,821,377, 3,821,401, 3,789,121, 3,789,123, 3,726,978, 3,694,471, 3,691,214, 3,678,169, 3,624,216;

immunosuppressive agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,450,159, 4,450,159, 5,905,085, 5,883,119, 5,880,280, 5,877,184, 5,874,594, 5,843,452, 5,817,672, 5,817,661, 5,817,660, 5,801,193, 5,776,974, 5,763,478, 5,739,169, 5,723,466, 5,719,176, 5,696,156, 5,695,753, 5,693,648, 5,693,645, 5,691,346, 5,686,469, 5,686,424, 5,679,705, 5,679,640, 5,670,504, 5,665,774, 5,665,772, 5,648,376, 5,639,455, 5,633,277, 5,624,930, 5,622,970, 5,605,903, 5,604,229, 5,574,041, 5,565,560, 5,550,233, 5,545,734, 5,540,931, 5,532,248, 5,527,820, 5,516,797, 5,514,688, 5,512,687, 5,506,233, 5,506,228, 5,494,895, 5,484,788, 5,470,857, 5,464,615, 5,432,183, 5,431,896, 5,385,918, 5,349,061, 5,344,925, 5,330,993, 5,308,837, 5,290,783, 5,290,772, 5,284,877, 5,284,840, 5,273,979, 5,262,533, 5,260,300, 5,252,732, 5,250,678, 5,247,076, 5,244,896, 5,238,689, 5,219,884, 5,208,241, 5,208,228, 5,202,332, 5,192,773, 5,189,042, 5,169,851, 5,162,334, 5,151,413, 5,149,701, 5,147,877, 5,143,918, 5,138,051, 5,093,338, 5,091,389, 5,068,323, 5,068,247, 5,064,835, 5,061,728, 5,055,290, 4,981,792, 4,810,692, 4,410,696, 4,346,096, 4,342,769, 4,317,825, 4,256,766, 4,180,588, 4,000,275, 3,759,921;

immunomodulatory agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,446,128, 4,524,147, 4,720,484, 4,722,899, 4,748,018, 4,877,619, 4,998,931, 5,049,387, 5,118,509, 5,152,980, 5,256,416, 5,468,729, 5,583,139, 5,604,234, 5,612,060, 5,612,350, 5,658,564, 5,672,605, 5,681,571, 5,708,002, 5,723,718, 5,736,143, 5,744,495, 5,753,687, 5,770,201, 5,869,057, 5,891,653, 5,939,455, 5,948,407, 6,006,752, 6,024,957, 6,030,624, 6,037,372, 6,037,373, 6,043,247, 6,060,049, 6,087,096, 6,096,315, 6,099,838, 6,103,235, 6,124,495, 6,153,203, 6,169,087, 6,255,278, 6,262,044, 6,290,950, 6,306,651, 6,322,796, 6,329,153, 6,344,476, 6,352,698, 6,365,163, 6,379,668, 6,391,303, 6,395,767, 6,403,555, 6,410,556, 6,412,492, 6,468,537, 6,489,330, 6,521,232, 6,525,035, 6,525,242, 6,558,663, 6,572,860;

analgesic agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,292,736, 5,688,825, 5,554,789, 5,455,230, 5,292,736, 5,298,522, 5,216,165, 5,438,064, 5,204,365, 5,017,578, 4,906,655, 4,906,655, 4,994,450, 4,749,792, 4,980,365, 4,794,110, 4,670,541, 4,737,493, 4,622,326, 4,536,512, 4,719,231, 4,533,671, 4,552,866, 4,539,312, 4,569,942, 4,681,879, 4,511,724, 4,556,672, 4,721,712, 4,474,806, 4,595,686, 4,440,779, 4,434,175, 4,608,374, 4,395,402, 4,400,534, 4,374,139, 4,361,583, 4,252,816, 4,251,530, 5,874,459, 5,688,825, 5,554,789, 5,455,230, 5,438,064, 5,298,522, 5,216,165, 5,204,365, 5,030,639, 5,017,578, 5,008,264, 4,994,450, 4,980,365, 4,906,655, 4,847,290, 4,844,907, 4,794,110, 4,791,129, 4,774,256, 4,749,792, 4,737,493, 4,721,712, 4,719,231, 4,681,879, 4,670,541, 4,667,039, 4,658,037, 4,634,708, 4,623,648, 4,622,326, 4,608,374, 4,595,686, 4,594,188, 4,569,942, 4,556,672, 4,552,866, 4,539,312, 4,536,512, 4,533,671, 4,511,724, 4,440,779, 4,434,175, 4,400,534, 4,395,402, 4,391,827, 4,374,139, 4,361,583, 4,322,420, 4,306,097, 4,252,816, 4,251,530, 4,244,955, 4,232,018, 4,209,520, 4,164,514, 4,147,872, 4,133,819, 4,124,713, 4,117,012, 4,064,272, 4,022,836, 3,966,944;

cholinergic agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,219,872, 5,219,873, 5,073,560, 5,073,560, 5,346,911, 5,424,301, 5,073,560, 5,219,872, 4,900,748, 4,786,648, 4,798,841, 4,782,071, 4,710,508, 5,482,938, 5,464,842, 5,378,723, 5,346,911, 5,318,978, 5,219,873, 5,219,872, 5,084,281, 5,073,560, 5,002,955, 4,988,710, 4,900,748, 4,798,841, 4,786,648, 4,782,071, 4,745,123, 4,710,508;

adrenergic agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,091,528, 5,091,528, 4,835,157, 5,708,015, 5,594,027, 5,580,892, 5,576,332, 5,510,376, 5,482,961, 5,334,601, 5,202,347, 5,135,926, 5,116,867, 5,091,528, 5,017,618, 4,835,157, 4,829,086, 4,579,867, 4,568,679, 4,469,690, 4,395,559, 4,381,309, 4,363,808, 4,343,800, 4,329,289, 4,314,943, 4,311,708, 4,304,721, 4,296,117, 4,285,873, 4,281,189, 4,278,608, 4,247,710, 4,145,550, 4,145,425, 4,139,535, 4,082,843, 4,011,321, 4,001,421, 3,982,010, 3,940,407, 3,852,468, 3,832,470;

antihistamine agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,874,479, 5,863,938, 5,856,364, 5,770,612, 5,702,688, 5,674,912, 5,663,208, 5,658,957, 5,652,274, 5,648,380, 5,646,190, 5,641,814, 5,633,285, 5,614,561, 5,602,183, 4,923,892, 4,782,058, 4,393,210, 4,180,583, 3,965,257, 3,946,022, 3,931,197;

steroidal agents, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,863,538, 5,855,907, 5,855,866, 5,780,592, 5,776,427, 5,651,987, 5,346,887, 5,256,408, 5,252,319, 5,209,926, 4,996,335, 4,927,807, 4,910,192, 4,710,495, 4,049,805, 4,004,005, 3,670,079, 3,608,076, 5,892,028, 5,888,995, 5,883,087, 5,880,115, 5,869,475, 5,866,558, 5,861,390, 5,861,388, 5,854,235, 5,837,698, 5,834,452, 5,830,886, 5,792,758, 5,792,757, 5,763,361, 5,744,462, 5,741,787, 5,741,786, 5,733,899, 5,731,345, 5,723,638, 5,721,226, 5,712,264, 5,712,263, 5,710,144, 5,707,984, 5,705,494, 5,700,793, 5,698,720, 5,698,545, 5,696,106, 5,677,293, 5,674,861, 5,661,141, 5,656,621, 5,646,136, 5,637,691, 5,616,574, 5,614,514, 5,604,215, 5,604,213, 5,599,807, 5,585,482, 5,565,588, 5,563,259, 5,563,131, 5,561,124, 5,556,845, 5,547,949, 5,536,714, 5,527,806, 5,506,354, 5,506,221, 5,494,907, 5,491,136, 5,478,956, 5,426,179, 5,422,262, 5,391,776, 5,382,661, 5,380,841, 5,380,840, 5,380,839, 5,373,095, 5,371,078, 5,352,809, 5,344,827, 5,344,826, 5,338,837, 5,336,686, 5,292,906, 5,292,878, 5,281,587, 5,272,140, 5,244,886, 5,236,912, 5,232,915, 5,219,879, 5,218,109, 5,215,972, 5,212,166, 5,206,415, 5,194,602, 5,166,201, 5,166,055, 5,126,488, 5,116,829, 5,108,996, 5,099,037, 5,096,892, 5,093,502, 5,086,047, 5,084,450, 5,082,835, 5,081,114, 5,053,404, 5,041,433, 5,041,432, 5,034,548, 5,032,586, 5,026,882, 4,996,335, 4,975,537, 4,970,205, 4,954,446, 4,950,428, 4,946,834, 4,937,237, 4,921,846, 4,920,099, 4,910,226, 4,900,725, 4,892,867, 4,888,336, 4,885,280, 4,882,322, 4,882,319, 4,882,315, 4,874,855, 4,868,167, 4,865,767, 4,861,875, 4,861,765, 4,861,763, 4,847,014, 4,774,236, 4,753,932, 4,711,856, 4,710,495, 4,701,450, 4,701,449, 4,689,410, 4,680,290, 4,670,551, 4,664,850, 4,659,516, 4,647,410, 4,634,695, 4,634,693, 4,588,530, 4,567,000, 4,560,557, 4,558,041, 4,552,871, 4,552,868, 4,541,956, 4,519,946, 4,515,787, 4,512,986, 4,502,989, 4,495,102; the disclosures of all the above of which are herein incorporated by reference.

The drug moiety of the conjugate may be the whole drug or a binding fragment or portion thereof that retains its affinity and specificity for the target of interest while having a linkage site for covalent bonding to the vector protein ligand or linker. The conjugates of such drugs may be used for the same disorders, diseases, and indications as the drugs themselves.

iii. Preferred Cancer Chemotherapeutic Active Agents

Preferred cancer chemotherapeutic agents for use in the RAP variant or CR-specific antibody based conjugates of the invention include all drugs which may be useful for treating brain tumors or other neoplasia in or around the brain, either in the free form, or, if not so useful for such tumors in the free form, useful when linked to the RAP variant or CR-specific antibody. Such chemotherapeutic agents are preferably cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents including but not limited to adriamycin (also known as doxorubicin), cisplatin, paclitaxel, analogs thereof, and other chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate activity against tumours ex vivo and in vivo. Such chemotherapeutic agents also include alkylating agents, antimetabolites, natural products (such as vinca alkaloids, epidophyllotoxins, antibiotics, enzymes and biological response modifiers), topoisomerase inhibitors, microtubule inhibitors, spindle poisons, hormones and antagonists, and miscellaneous agents such as platinum coordination complexes, anthracendiones, substituted ureas, etc. hose of skill in the art will know of other chemotherapeutic agents.

Preferred chemotherapeutic agents are those, which in the free form, demonstrate unacceptable systemic toxicity at desired doses. The general systemic toxicity associated with therapeutic levels of such agents is reduced by their linkage to a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody. Particularly preferred are cardiotoxic compounds that are useful therapeutics but are dose limited by cardiotoxicity. A classic example is adriamycin (also known as doxorubicin) and its analogs, such as daunorubicin. Linking a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody to such drugs decreases accumulation and associated cardiotoxicity at the heart.

iv. Glycoconjugates

Glycoconjugates are any molecule which includes a carbohydrate portion. Examples include, but are not limited to, glycoproteins, oligosaccharides, glycolipids and proteoglycans. Such molecules have beneficial functions such as enhancement of bioavailability of therapeutic agents or ability to block pathogenic mechanisms. For example, alpha-L-iduronidase is a glycoconjugate (glycoprotein) that is efficiently distributed throughout the body because of the oligomannose 7-bisphosphate determinant attached to the enzyme. Heparin sulfate is a carbohydrate portion of a proteoglycan that is useful for blocking coagulation pathways in humans. Attachment of suitable RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies to glycoconjugates with therapeutic activities may provide a means of increasing the potency of the glycoconjugate by affecting biodistribution. Alternatively, RAP variant- (or CR-specific antibody-) glycoconjugate fusions may be engineered to act as bis-specific receptor-binding molecules with the ability to directly affect the functions of one or more receptors in specific tissues.

v. Nanoparticles

Nanoparticles are macromolecular assemblies constructed from biodegradable and non-biodegradable polymers or from other materials such as lipids. Such assemblies may be engineered to contain therapeutic molecules in cavities within the particle. Through this means, nanoparticles provide a means of altering the biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity and potency of drugs. Attachment of suitable RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies would, in turn, provide a means of increasing the specificity of tissue distribution of these molecules.

H. METHODS OF PRODUCING POLYPEPTIDES OF THE INVENTION i. Host Cells

Polypeptides of the invention, including RAP variant conjugates, CR-specific antibodies and CR-specific antibody conjugates, can be produced by any means known in the art. Host cells used to produce chimeric proteins are bacterial, yeast, insect, non-mammalian vertebrate, or mammalian cells; the mammalian cells include, but are not limited to, hamster, monkey, chimpanzee, dog, cat, bovine, porcine, mouse, rat, rabbit, sheep and human cells. The host cells can be immortalized cells (a cell line) or non-immortalized (primary or secondary) cells and can be any of a wide variety of cell types, such as, but not limited to, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, epithelial cells (e.g., mammary epithelial cells, intestinal epithelial cells), ovary cells (e.g., Chinese hamster ovary or CHO cells), endothelial cells, glial cells, neural cells, formed elements of the blood (e.g., lymphocytes, bone marrow cells), muscle cells, hepatocytes and precursors of these somatic cell types. Host cells can include mutants of CHO cells that do not express LRP such as CHO13-5-1 (FitzGerald et al., J. Biol. Chem., 129(6):1533-41, 1995).

Cells that contain and express DNA or RNA encoding the chimeric protein are referred to herein as genetically modified cells. Mammalian cells that contain and express DNA or RNA encoding the chimeric protein are referred to as genetically modified mammalian cells. Introduction of the DNA or RNA into cells is by a known transfection method, such as electroporation, microinjection, microprojectile bombardment, calcium phosphate precipitation, modified calcium phosphate precipitation, cationic lipid treatment, photoporation, fusion methodologies, receptor mediated transfer, or polybrene precipitation. Alternatively, the DNA or RNA can be introduced by infection with a viral vector. Methods of producing cells, including mammalian cells, which express DNA or RNA encoding a chimeric protein are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,048,729, 5,994,129, and 6,063,630. The teachings of each of these applications are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

ii. Nucleic Acid Constructs

A nucleic acid construct used to express the chimeric protein can be one which is expressed extrachromosomally (episomally) in the transfected mammalian cell or one which integrates, either randomly or at a pre-selected targeted site through homologous recombination, into the recipient cell's genome. A construct which is expressed extrachromosomally comprises, in addition to chimeric protein-encoding sequences, sequences sufficient for expression of the protein in the cells and, optionally, for replication of the construct. It typically includes a promoter, chimeric protein-encoding DNA and a polyadenylation site. The DNA encoding the chimeric protein is positioned in the construct in such a manner that its expression is under the control of the promoter. Optionally, the construct may contain additional components such as one or more of the following: a splice site, an enhancer sequence, a selectable marker gene under the control of an appropriate promoter, and an amplifiable marker gene under the control of an appropriate promoter.

In those embodiments in which the DNA construct integrates into the cell's genome, it need include only the chimeric protein-encoding nucleic acid sequences. Optionally, it can include a promoter and an enhancer sequence, a polyadenylation site or sites, a splice site or sites, nucleic acid sequences which encode a selectable marker or markers, nucleic acid sequences which encode an amplifiable marker and/or DNA homologous to genomic DNA in the recipient cell to target integration of the DNA to a selected site in the genome (targeting DNA or DNA sequences).

iii. Cell Culture Methods

Mammalian cells containing the chimeric protein-encoding DNA or RNA are cultured under conditions appropriate for growth of the cells and expression of the DNA or RNA. Those cells which express the chimeric protein can be identified, using known methods and methods described herein, and the chimeric protein isolated and purified, using known methods and methods also described herein; either with or without amplification of chimeric protein production. Identification can be carried out, for example, through screening genetically modified mammalian cells displaying a phenotype indicative of the presence of DNA or RNA encoding the chimeric protein, such as PCR screening, screening by Southern blot analysis, or screening for the expression of the chimeric protein. Selection of cells having incorporated chimeric protein-encoding DNA may be accomplished by including a selectable marker in the DNA construct and culturing transfected or infected cells containing a selectable marker gene under conditions appropriate for survival of only those cells that express the selectable marker gene. Further amplification of the introduced DNA construct can be affected by culturing genetically modified mammalian cells under conditions appropriate for amplification (e.g., culturing genetically modified mammalian cells containing an amplifiable marker gene in the presence of a concentration of a drug at which only cells containing multiple copies of the amplifiable marker gene can survive).

Genetically modified mammalian cells expressing the chimeric protein can be identified, as described herein, by detection of the expression product. For example, mammalian cells expressing chimeric protein in which the carrier is a RAP variant can be identified by a sandwich enzyme immunoassay. The antibodies can be directed toward the RAP variant portion or the active agent portion of the conjugate.

iv. Production of RAP Variant Polypeptides

RAP variant polypeptides for use according to the invention include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,766 that is enclosed herein by reference in its entirety for the purposes of disclosing such peptides and their production for use in the compounds and compositions of the present invention. RAP variant polypeptides is produced using any of protein preparation and purification methods known to those of skill in the art.

The ligand is purified from a naturally occurring source of the protein, can be isolated from a recombinant host expressing the ligand, or synthesized using well known techniques in protein synthesis. A skilled artisan readily adapts a variety of such techniques in order to obtain a RAP variant that contain the receptor-binding site. (Melman et al., J. Biol. Chem. 276 (31): 29338-29346 (2001); Savonen et al., J Biol Chem. 274(36): 25877-25882 (1999); Nielsen et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:7521-7525 (1997); Medved et al., J. Biol. Chem. 274(2): 717-727 (1999); Rall et al., J. Biol. Chem. 273(37): 24152-24157 (1998); Orlando et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 3161-3163 (1994)).

The isolation of native RAP proteins has been previously described (Ashcom et al., J. Cell. Biol. 110:1041-1048 (1990) and Jensen et al., FEBS Lett. 255:275-280 (1989)). RAP variant fragments are generated from isolated native protein which are converted by enzymatic and/or chemical cleavage to generate fragments of the whole protein. U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,775 is herein incorporated by reference with particular reference to such methods for obtaining RAP variant polypeptides. In addition, the RAP variant are expressed in a recombinant bacteria (Williams et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267:9035-9040 (1992); Wurshawsky et al., J. Biol. Chem. 269:3325-3330 (1994)). Procedures for purifying the 39 kDa RAP protein from a recombinant E. coli strain have been previously described (Herz et al., J. Biol. Chem. 266, 21232-21238 (1991); U.S. Pat. No. 5,474,766).

Cultures of E. coli strain DH5alpha carrying the expression plasmid pGEX-39 kDa are grown to mid-log phase in LB medium with 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37° C. Cultures are cooled to 30° C. and supplemented with 0.01% isopropylthio-beta-D-galactoside to induce expression of the glutathione-S-transferase-39 kDa fusion protein. Following a 4-6 hour induction at 30° C., cultures are cooled with ice and recovered by centrifugation. Further steps are conducted at 4° C. Cell pellets are lysed in PBS with 1% Triton X-100, 1 μM pepstatin, 2.5 μg/ml leupeptin, 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1 μM ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA). The lysate is sonicated with a Branson Model 450 Sonifier and the resulting membranes and other cellular debris are separated by centrifugation at 15,000 g for 15 minutes. The recovered supernatant is incubated overnight with agarose immobilized glutathione beads (Sigma Chemical Co.) in PBS and 0.1% sodium azide. The beads are washed, and the fusion protein eluted by competition with 5 mM reduced glutathione (Sigma Chemical Co.). Following dialysis, the fusion protein is cleaved by an overnight incubation with 100 ng of activated human thrombin per 50 μg of fusion protein. The glutathione-S-transferase epitope is subsequently be removed by further incubation with agarose immobilized glutathione beads.

While the above method is described for the production and purification of RAP, as indicated above, other RAP variants also may be produced using similar techniques. A review of such ligands may be found in Christensen and Birn, (Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol., 280:F562-F573, 2001, see particularly Table 1 and references cited therein) Techniques for making and purifying such ligands are well known to those of skill in the art.

I. CHARACTERIZATION OF CONJUGATES i. Labels

In some embodiments, the RAP variant-based active agent conjugate or CR-specific antibody or antibody conjugate is labeled to facilitate its detection. A “label” or a “detectable moiety” is a composition detectable by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, chemical, or other physical means. For example, labels suitable for use in the present invention include, for example, radioactive labels (e.g., 32P), fluorophores (e.g., fluorescein), electron dense reagents, enzymes (e.g., as commonly used in an ELISA), biotin, digoxigenin, or haptens and proteins which can be made detectable, e.g., by incorporating a radiolabel into the hapten or peptide, or used to detect antibodies specifically reactive with the hapten or peptide.

As noted above, depending on the screening assay employed, the active agent, the linker or the RAP variant polypeptide portion of a conjugate or the CR-specific antibody may be labeled. The particular label or detectable group used is not a critical aspect of the invention, as long as it does not significantly interfere with the biological activity of the conjugate. The detectable group can be any material having a detectable physical or chemical property. Thus, a label is any composition detectable by spectroscopic, photochemical, biochemical, immunochemical, electrical, optical or chemical means.

Examples of labels suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, fluorescent dyes (e.g., fluorescein isothiocyanate, Texas red, rhodamine, and the like), radiolabels (e.g., ³H, ¹²⁵I, ³⁵S, ¹⁴C, or ³²P), enzymes (e.g., horse radish peroxidase, alkaline phosphatase and others commonly used in an ELISA), and colorimetric labels such as colloidal gold or colored glass or plastic beads (e.g., polystyrene, polypropylene, latex, etc.).

The label may be coupled directly or indirectly to the desired component of the assay according to methods well known in the art. Preferably, the label in one embodiment is covalently bound to the biopolymer using an isocyanate reagent for conjugating an active agent according to the invention. In one aspect of the invention, the bifunctional isocyanate reagents of the invention can be used to conjugate a label to a biopolymer to form a label biopolymer conjugate without an active agent attached thereto. The label biopolymer conjugate may be used as an intermediate for the synthesis of a labeled conjugate according to the invention or may be used to detect the biopolymer conjugate. As indicated above, a wide variety of labels can be used, with the choice of label depending on sensitivity required, ease of conjugation with the desired component of the assay, stability requirements, available instrumentation, and disposal provisions. Non-radioactive labels are often attached by indirect means. Generally, a ligand molecule (e.g., biotin) is covalently bound to the molecule. The ligand binds to another molecules (e.g., streptavidin) molecule, which is either inherently detectable or covalently bound to a signal system, such as a detectable enzyme, a fluorescent compound, or a chemiluminescent compound.

The conjugates can also be conjugated directly to signal generating compounds, e.g., by conjugation with an enzyme or fluorophore. Enzymes suitable for use as labels include, but are not limited to, hydrolases, particularly phosphatases, esterases and glycosidases, or oxidotases, particularly peroxidases. Fluorescent compounds, i.e., fluorophores, suitable for use as labels include, but are not limited to, fluorescein and its derivatives, rhodamine and its derivatives, dansyl, umbelliferone, etc. Further examples of suitable fluorophores include, but are not limited to, eosin, TRITC-amine, quinine, fluorescein W, acridine yellow, lissamine rhodamine, B sulfonyl chloride erythroscein, ruthenium (tris, bipyridinium), Texas Red, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, flavin adenine dinucleotide, etc. Chemiluminescent compounds suitable for use as labels include, but are not limited to, luciferin and 2,3-dihydrophthalazinediones, e.g., luminol. For a review of various labeling or signal producing systems that can be used in the methods of the present invention, see U.S. Pat. No. 4,391,904.

Means of detecting labels are well known to those of skill in the art. Thus, for example, where the label is a radioactive label, means for detection include a scintillation counter or photographic film as in autoradiography. Where the label is a fluorescent label, it may be detected by exciting the fluorochrome with the appropriate wavelength of light and detecting the resulting fluorescence. The fluorescence may be detected visually, by the use of electronic detectors such as charge coupled devices (CCDs) or photomultipliers and the like. Similarly, enzymatic labels may be detected by providing the appropriate substrates for the enzyme and detecting the resulting reaction product. Colorimetric or chemiluminescent labels may be detected simply by observing the color associated with the label. Other labeling and detection systems suitable for use in the methods of the present invention will be readily apparent to those of skill in the art. Such labeled modulators and ligands may be used in the diagnosis of a disease or health condition.

ii. Screening Assays for Rap Variants, CR-Specific Antibodies, Active Agent Conjugates and Modulators of their Delivery

The present invention provides a screening assay for RAP variants, CR-specific antibodies, or polypeptide-active agent conjugates, wherein the candidate compounds are tested for their ability to influence a measurable activity of a specific receptor which can be situated in a whole cell, a cell extract, semi-purified, purified or any other format that allows for measurement of its activity. The activity can be any activity in the expression, function or degradation of receptor including, for example, the amount or timing of such activities. Such activities include, for example, transcription, transcript processing, translation or transcript stability of the receptor gene sequence or mRNA transcript. Such activities include, for example, the synthesis of new receptor, the sub-cellular localization of the receptor and activation of receptor biological activity. Such activities include, for example, the ability of the receptor to bind substances, adopt conformations, catalyze reactions, bind known ligands and the like. Such activities include, for example, the amount or stability of the receptor, the processing and removal or degradation of the receptor and the like. In preferred embodiments, the candidate compound used is one which has been modified or naturally has a higher binding affinity for the targeted receptor than for any other receptor.

The invention contemplates a variety of different screening formats. Some designs are considered low throughput and test only one or a few compounds in series or in parallel. High throughput screening assays are suitable for screening tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of compounds in a matter of weeks or months. “In silico” screening formats employ computer-aided rational design techniques to identify potential modulators of receptor biological activity.

J. METHODS OF USING, PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS, AND THEIR ADMINISTRATION

The conjugates and modulators may be administered by a variety of routes. For oral preparations, the conjugates can be used alone or in combination with appropriate additives to make tablets, powders, granules or capsules, for example, with conventional additives, such as lactose, mannitol, corn starch or potato starch; with binders, such as crystalline cellulose, cellulose derivatives, acacia, corn starch or gelatins; with disintegrators, such as corn starch, potato starch or sodium carboxymethylcellulose; with lubricants, such as talc or magnesium stearate; and if desired, with diluents, buffering agents, moistening agents, preservatives and flavoring agents.

The conjugates and modulators can be formulated into preparations for injection by dissolving, suspending or emulsifying them in an aqueous or nonaqueous solvent, such as vegetable or other similar oils, synthetic aliphatic acid glycerides, esters of higher aliphatic acids or propylene glycol; and if desired, with conventional additives such as solubilizers, isotonic agents, suspending agents, emulsifying agents, stabilizers and preservatives.

The conjugates, modulators, and LDLR ligands can be utilized in aerosol formulation to be administered via inhalation. The compounds of the present invention can be formulated into pressurized acceptable propellants such as dichlorodifluoromethane, propane, nitrogen and the like.

Furthermore, the conjugates and modulators can be made into suppositories by mixing with a variety of bases such as emulsifying bases or water-soluble bases. The compounds of the present invention can be administered rectally via a suppository. The suppository can include vehicles such as cocoa butter, carbowaxes and polyethylene glycols, which melt at body temperature, yet are solidified at room temperature.

Unit dosage forms of the conjugate, modulator, and LDLR ligand for oral or rectal administration such as syrups, elixirs, and suspensions may be provided wherein each dosage unit, for example, teaspoonful, tablespoonful, tablet or suppository, contains a predetermined amount of the composition containing active agent. Similarly, unit dosage forms for injection or intravenous administration may comprise the conjugate in a composition as a solution in sterile water, normal saline or another pharmaceutically acceptable carrier.

In practical use, the conjugate, modulator, and LDLR ligand according to the invention can be combined as the active ingredient in intimate admixture with a pharmaceutical carrier according to conventional pharmaceutical compounding techniques. The carrier may take a wide variety of forms depending on the form of preparation desired for administration, e.g., oral or parenteral (including intravenous). In preparing the compositions for oral dosage form, any of the usual pharmaceutical media may be employed, such as, for example, water, glycols, oils, alcohols, flavoring agents, preservatives, coloring agents and the like in the case of oral liquid preparations, such as, for example, suspensions, elixirs and solutions; or carriers such as starches, sugars, microcrystalline cellulose, diluents, granulating agents, lubricants, binders, disintegrating agents and the like in the case of oral solid preparations such as, for example, powders, hard and soft capsules and tablets, with the solid oral preparations being preferred over the liquid preparations.

With respect to transdermal routes of administration, methods for transdermal administration of drugs are disclosed in Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 17th Edition, (Gennaro et al. Eds. Mack Publishing Co., 1985). Dermal or skin patches are a preferred means for transdermal delivery of the conjugates, modulators, and LRP ligands of the invention. Patches preferably provide an absorption enhancer such as DMSO to increase the absorption of the compounds. Other methods for transdermal drug delivery are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,962,012, 6,261,595, and 6,261,595. Each of which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

In specific embodiments, it is contemplated that the therapeutic administering of the conjugates described herein will be administered intrathecally into the CSF. The intrathecal administration of the present invention may comprise introducing the pharmaceutical composition into a cerebral ventricle. Alternatively, the intrathecal administration may comprise introducing the pharmaceutical composition into the lumbar area. In yet another alternative, the intrathecal administration comprises introducing the pharmaceutical composition into the cisterna magna. Any such administration is preferably via a bolus injection. Depending on the severity of the symptoms and the responsiveness of the subject to the therapy, such a bolus injection may be administered once per week, once per month, once every 6 months or annually. In other embodiments, the intrathecal administration is achieved by use of an infusion pump. The pharmaceutical could of course be intrathecally administered continually over a period of at least several days or alternatively, the intrathecal administration is continually over a period of at least four weeks. Of course, where the administration is via continuous infusion, the rate of dose administration of the enzyme replacement therapy may be greatly reduced as compared to the bolus injection administration. In preferred embodiments, the active agent of the conjugate is iduronidase and it is delivered in an amount that comprises about 1 mg iduronidase/20 kg of body weight of the mammal being treated for MPS. In particular embodiments, the above dose is delivered to 15 cc CSF. At such a concentration it is contemplated that the enzyme concentration will be 18,000 units per ml of CSF. It should be understood that the aforementioned dosage is merely an exemplary dosage and those of skill in the art will understand that this dosage may be varied.

The methods and compositions of the invention may be combined with methods and compositions of inducing antigen specific tolerance prior to the enzyme replacement therapy. Such methods include inducing antigen specific tolerance comprises administration of an immunosuppressive agent, such as e.g., cyclosporine A and may further comprise administration of an antiproliferative agent, including but not limited to a nucleotide analog or an anti-metabolite. The antiproliferative agent may be azathioprine. Further methods are described in e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/141,668, published as U.S. Publication No. 20030211113; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/429,314 published as U.S. Publication No. 20040009906, each incorporated herein by reference.

Pharmaceutically acceptable excipients, such as vehicles, adjuvants, carriers or diluents, are commercially available. Moreover, pharmaceutically acceptable auxiliary substances, such as pH adjusting and buffering agents, tonicity adjusting agents, stabilizers, wetting agents and the like, are commercially available.

Those of skill will readily appreciate that dose levels can vary as a function of the specific compound, the severity of the symptoms and the susceptibility of the subject to side effects. Preferred dosages for a given compound are readily determinable by those of skill in the art by a variety of means, including, but not limited to dose response and pharmacokinetic assessments conducted in patients, test animals, and in vitro.

In each of these aspects, the compositions include, but are not limited to, compositions suitable for oral, rectal, topical, parenteral (including subcutaneous, intramuscular, and intravenous), pulmonary (nasal or buccal inhalation), or nasal administration, although the most suitable route in any given case will depend in part on the nature and severity of the conditions being treated and on the nature of the active ingredient. Exemplary routes of administration are the oral and intravenous routes. The compositions may be conveniently presented in unit dosage form and prepared by any of the methods well-known in the art of pharmacy.

In practical use, the modulators or according to the invention can be combined as the active ingredient in intimate admixture with a pharmaceutical carrier according to conventional pharmaceutical compounding techniques. The carrier may take a wide variety of forms depending on the form of preparation desired for administration, e.g., oral or parenteral (including intravenous). In preparing the compositions for oral dosage form, any of the usual pharmaceutical media may be employed, such as, for example, water, glycols, oils, alcohols, flavoring agents, preservatives, coloring agents and the like in the case of oral liquid preparations, such as, for example, suspensions, elixirs and solutions; or carriers such as starches, sugars, microcrystalline cellulose, diluents, granulating agents, lubricants, binders, disintegrating agents and the like in the case of oral solid preparations such as, for example, powders, hard and soft capsules and tablets, with the solid oral preparations being preferred over the liquid preparations.

Because of their ease of administration, tablets and capsules represent the most advantageous oral dosage unit form in which case solid pharmaceutical carriers are obviously employed. If desired, tablets may be coated by standard aqueous or nonaqueous techniques. The percentage of an active compound in these compositions may, of course, be varied and may conveniently be between about 2 percent to about 60 percent of the weight of the unit.

The conjugates, modulators, and ligands of the invention are useful for therapeutic, prophylactic and diagnostic intervention in animals, and in particular in humans. As described herein, the conjugates show preferential accumulation and/or release of the active agent in any target organ, compartment, or site depending upon the biopolymer used.

Compositions of the present invention may be administered encapsulated in or attached to viral envelopes or vesicles, or incorporated into cells. Vesicles are micellular particles which are usually spherical and which are frequently lipidic. Liposomes are vesicles formed from a bilayer membrane. Suitable vesicles include, but are not limited to, unilamellar vesicles and multilamellar lipid vesicles or liposomes. Such vesicles and liposomes may be made from a wide range of lipid or phospholipid compounds, such as phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylethanolamine, sphingomyelin, glycolipids, gangliosides, etc. using standard techniques, such as those described in, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 4,394,448. Such vesicles or liposomes may be used to administer compounds intracellularly and to deliver compounds to the target organs. Controlled release of a p97-composition of interest may also be achieved using encapsulation (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,186,941).

Any route of administration that delivers the RAP variant, CR-specific antibody, RAP variant-based active agent conjugate, antibody conjugate or modulator composition into the blood stream, or preferably at least outside of the blood-brain barrier, may be used. Preferably, the composition is administered peripherally, most preferably intravenously or by cardiac catheter. Intrajugular and intracarotid injections are also useful. Compositions may be administered locally or regionally, such as intraperitoneally or subcutaneously on intramuscularly. In one aspect, compositions are administered with a suitable pharmaceutical diluent or carrier.

Dosages to be administered will depend on individual needs, on the desired effect, the active agent used, the biopolymer and on the chosen route of administration. Preferred dosages of a compound of the invention range from about 0.2 μmol/kg to about 25 nmol/kg, and particularly preferred dosages range from 2-250 μmol/kg; alternatively, preferred doses of the compound may be in the range of 0.02 to 2000 mg/kg. These dosages will be influenced by the number of active agent or drug moieties associated with the biopolymer. Alternatively, dosages may be calculated based on the active agent administered.

In exemplary embodiments the compound is a RAP variant conjugate. For instance, doses of RAP variant-adriamycin comprising from 0.005 to 100 mg/kg of adriamycin are also useful in vivo. Particularly preferred is a dosage of RAP variant-adriamycin comprising from 0.05 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg of adriamycin. Those skilled in the art can determine suitable doses for active agents linked to a RAP variant based in part on the recommended dosage used for the free form of the active agent. Conjugation of the active agent to a RAP variant generally reduces the amount of drug needed to obtain the same effect.

The conjugates and modulators of the invention are useful for therapeutic, prophylactic and diagnostic intervention in animals, and in particular in humans. The compounds of the invention may show preferential accumulation in particular tissues. Preferred medical indications for diagnostic uses include, for example, any condition associated with a target organ of interest (e.g., lung, liver, kidney, spleen). In particularly preferred embodiments, the target organ of interest in the brain.

The subject methods find use in the treatment of a variety of different disease conditions. In certain embodiments, of particular interest is the use of the subject methods in disease conditions where an active agent or drug having desired activity has been previously identified, but in which the active agent or drug is not adequately delivered to the target site, area or compartment to produce a fully satisfactory therapeutic result. With such active agents or drugs, the subject methods of conjugating the active agent to a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody can be used to enhance the therapeutic efficacy and therapeutic index of active agent or drug.

The specific disease conditions treatable by with the subject conjugates are as varied as the types of drug moieties that can be present in the conjugate. Thus, disease conditions include cellular proliferative diseases, such as neoplastic diseases, autoimmune diseases, cardiovascular diseases, hormonal abnormality diseases, degenerative diseases, diseases of aging, diseases of the central nervous system (e.g., Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy, hyperlipidemias), psychiatric diseases and conditions (e.g., schizophrenia, mood disorders such as depression and anxiety), infectious diseases, enzyme deficiency diseases, lysosomal storage diseases such as those described above, and the like.

Treatment is meant to encompass any beneficial outcome to a subject associated with administration of a conjugate including a reduced likelihood of acquiring a disease, prevention of a disease, slowing, stopping or reversing, the progression of a disease or an amelioration of the symptoms associated with the disease condition afflicting the host, where amelioration or benefit is used in a broad sense to refer to at least a reduction in the magnitude of a parameter, e.g., symptom, associated with the pathological condition being treated, such as inflammation and pain associated therewith. As such, treatment also includes situations where the pathological condition, or at least symptoms associated therewith, are completely inhibited, e.g., prevented from happening, or stopped, e.g., terminated, such that the host no longer suffers from the pathological condition, or at least the symptoms that characterize the pathological condition.

In specific embodiments, the disorder being treated is a lysosomal storage disease and the conjugate is administered as a pharmaceutical composition in an amount effective to decrease the amount of storage granules present in the brain tissue of said mammal. Typically, the symptoms of such a disorder are monitored through routine assessment of history, physical examination, echocardiography, electrocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging, polysomnography, skeletal survey, range of motion measurements, corneal photographs, and skin biopsy. Administration of a RAP variant, RAP variant conjugated to a therapeutic agent, CR-specific antibody or antibody-conjugate in such a disorder results in normalization of developmental delay and regression in said subject, reduction in high pressure hydrocephalus, reduction in spinal cord compression in said subject, and reduction in number and/or size of perivascular cysts around the brain vessels of said subject. Methods of monitoring and assessing such sequelae are known to those of skill in the art. Those of skill in the art are referred to U.S. Pat. No. 6,585,971; U.S. Pat. No. 6,569,661 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,426,208 and U.S. Patent Publication No. 20040009906 for additional descriptions of such sequelae.

In some aspects, it may be useful to increase the tolerance of the animal to the therapy being delivered. Such methods are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/429,314 filed May 5, 2003 and published as 20040009906 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety).

In preferred embodiments, the animal is suffering from mucopolysaccharidosis I and has about 50% or less of a normal α-L-iduronidase activity. In such embodiments, it would be desirable to administered an effective dose of between about 0.001 mg/kg body weight and 0.5 mg/kg body weight of human α-L-iduronidase as part of the conjugate e.g., weekly to a subject suffering from a deficiency thereof. In other embodiments, the subject is given a dose of between about 0.01 mg/15 cc of CSF to about 5.0 mg/15 cc of CSF in the mammal of said human α-L-iduronidase weekly. The therapies contemplated herein promote the breakdown of glycosaminoglycan (GAG) in a brain cell of a subject having lysosomal storage disease. The brain cell may be a neuron, a neuroglial cell, an ependymal cell. Typically, the brain cells in which granule accumulation occurs and should be ameliorated by administering a conjugate of the invention include neurons, glial cells, microglial cells, astrocytes, oligodendroglial cells, perivascular cells, perithelial cells, meningeal cells, ependymal cells, arachnoid granulation cells, arachnoid membranes, dura mater, pia mater and choroid plexus cells. The therapy in preferred embodiments reduces storage granules in meningeal cells as compared to the number of lysosomal storage granules present in a similar cell in the absence of administration of said conjugate. This produces the therapeutic effects of relieving the symptoms of high pressure hydrocephalus in some subjects. and said administering reduces the amount of CSF fluid in the meningeal tissue of said subject.

iv. Neurological Disorders

In specific embodiments, the disorder being treated is a neurological disease and the conjugate is administered as a pharmaceutical composition in an amount effective to prevent, manage or treat such neurological disorder. A neurological disorder includes but is not limited to Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Amylotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, other demyelination related disorders, a central nervous system cancer, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, stroke or cerebral ischemia, plaque sclerosis, cerebral vasculitis, epilepsy, Huntington's disease, Tourette's syndrome, Guillain Barre syndrome, Wilson disease, Pick's disease, neuroinflammatory disorders, encephalitis, encephalomyelitis or meningitis of viral, fungal or bacterial origin, or other central nervous system infections, prion diseases, cerebellar ataxias, cerebellar degeneration, spinocerebellar degeneration syndromes, Friedreichs ataxia, ataxia telangiectasia, spinal damyotrophy, progressive supranuclear palsy, dystonia, muscle spasticity, tremor, retinitis pigmentosa, senile dementia, subcortical dementia, arteriosclerotic dementia, AIDS-associated dementia, or other dementias, striatonigral degeneration, mitochondrial encephalo-myopathies, neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis, lysosomal storage disorders with central nervous system involvement, leukodystrophies, urea cycle defect disorders, hepatic encephalopathies, renal encephalopathies, metabolic encephalopathies, porphyria, poisonings with neurotoxic compounds, radiation-induced brain damage, or psychiatric disorders such as psychosis, anxiety, depression, attention deficits, memory disorders, cognitive disorders, appetite disorders, obesity, addiction, appetence, or drug dependence.

Alzheimer's Disease

In a preferred embodiment, the disorder being treated is Alzheimer's disease, which is linked to elevated levels of a 40-42 amino acid peptide, amyloid beta (Aβ), within the brains of affected patients (Selkoe, et al. (1996) J Biol Chem 271, 18295-18298). Following its generation by a series of sequential proteolytic events, Aβ oligomerizes and ultimately accumulates in insoluble plaques within the neuronal interstitium. Both soluble and insoluble forms of Aβ have been demonstrated to be neurotoxic in vitro and in vivo (Zerbinatti, et al., (2004) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 1075-1080; Tsai, et al., (2004) Nat Neurosci; Schmitz, et al. (2004) Am J Pathol 164, 1495-1502; Gong, et al. (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 10417-10422; Bard, et al. (2000) Nat Med 6, 916-919; Schenk, et al. (1999) Nature 400, 173-177; Hsia, et al. (1999) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96, 3228-3233). Soluble Aβ monomers and oligomers have also been demonstrated to reversibly induce memory deficits by inhibiting long-term potentiation (Gong, et al. (2003) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 10417-10422).

Aβ is a proteolytic fragment of the amyloid precursor protein or APP, a cell surface membrane protein of undetermined function. Aβ formation is initiated within the neuronal secretory pathway or through endocytosis of APP by LRP1, a member of the LDLR family of receptors (Cam, et al., (2004) J Biol Chem 279, 29639-29646). Upon reaching the endosomal system, APP is cleaved by the beta-site APP-cleaving enzyme, or BACE, a membrane protease. BACE cuts APP at position 671, just N-terminal to the transmembrane domain. The remaining portion of APP is then cut a second time by a complex of three proteins, presenilin-1, presenilin-2 and nicastrin, which constitute the gamma-secretase complex (Xia, et al. (2003) J Cell Sci 116, 2839-2844). Presenilins cleave their substrates within the inner leaflet of the lipid bilayer. The gamma-secretase cleavage step occurs between positions 711 and 713, within the transmembrane domain of APP. Gamma-secretase cleavage releases Aβ, which is either retained within the neuron or secreted into the extracellular space. In either location, Aβ is toxic to neurons (Casas, et al. (2004) Am J Pathol 165, 1289-1300).

The sequential cleavage of APP by beta and gamma-secretases is termed the amyloidogenic pathway. An alternate pathway predominates in the normal brain: The entire ectodomain of APP is released through receptor shedding, a proteolytic process catalyzed by alpha-secretase. The released ectodomain is termed sAPPα and has been demonstrated to have neuroprotective and memory-enhancing effects (Furukawa, et al. (1996) J Neurochem 67, 1882-1896; Meziane, et al. (1998) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 12683-12688). APP ectodomain release is the key event in the nonamyloidogenic pathway. Proteolysis in this case occurs at position 688, within the region of APP that becomes Aβ during amyloidogenesis (Allinson, et al. (2003) J Neurosci Res 74, 342-352). Therefore, the amyloidogenic and nonamyloidogenic pathways are mutually exclusive. Release of sAPPα is catalyzed by an alpha-secretase, ADAM10, also a membrane-bound protease (Fahrenholz, et al. (2000) Ann NY Acad Sci 920, 215-222). ADAM10 is a disintegrin and metalloproteinase, part of a family of “sheddase” enzymes including the Notch cleaving enzyme (Kuzbanian) and the TNF-alpha precursor-cleaving enzyme (TACE, ADAM17). ADAM10 has been found to be responsible for shedding the ectodomain of BACE (Hussain, et al. (2003) J Biol Chem 278, 36264-36268).

Like the other members of the ADAM family, ADAM10 has an N-terminal prodomain, a catalytic protease domain, a disintegrin domain, a transmembrane domain and a cytoplasmic tail. The prodomain associates tightly with the catalytic domain, a requirement for proper folding of the enzyme. This association also allows a cysteine in the prodomain to reversibly bind to a zinc atom in the active site, masking the proteolytic activity of the enzyme while it is transiting the secretory pathway. Upon reaching the trans-Golgi, the proprotein convertase furin in the constitutive secretory pathway recognizes residues 211-214 (RKKR) of ADAM10, cleaving off the prodomain and rendering the enzyme proteolytically active.

An increase in Aβ release by beta and gamma-secretases, at the expense of sAPPα release by ADAM10, is believed to be the basis for Alzheimer's disease. A number of programs are underway to develop pharmacological inhibitors of BACE or the gamma-secretase complex, in order to shift APP processing away from amyloidogenic pathway. A complementary approach is to increase sAPPα production at the expense of Aβ by increasing levels of alpha-secretase in the brain interstitium. The imbalance in the proteolytic processing of APP has been corrected in animal models by modestly supplementing the endogenous levels of a particular neuronal protease, ADAM1. The benefits of increased ADAM10 levels in brain have been validated in mouse models of Alzheimer's disease (Postina, et al. (2004) J Clin Invest 113, 1456-1464; Lichtenthaler, et al. (2004) J Clin Invest 113, 1384-1387). Slight increases in brain ADAM10 levels have been found to prevent the disease phenotype.

The invention contemplates treating Alzheimer's diseases based on intravenous administration of a fusion between RAP, RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies or combinations thereof and ADAM10. A preferred embodiment is a method of treating Alzheimer's Disease comprising administering an ADAM10-RAP or RAP variant (or CR-specific antibody) fusion and increasing brain alpha-secretase activity, wherein said administering is via intravenous, intracarotid, or intrathecal administration. Increases in alpha-secretase levels, in turn, are expected to divert APP processing away from the amyloidogenic pathway. The enhanced production of sAPPα and its corollary, the diminished production of Aβ, are predicted to have a therapeutic effect on patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease. Alternatively, the invention contemplates treatments for. Alzheimer's disease comprising administration of fusions between RAP variants (or CR specific antibodies) and other proteases that act on APP or Abeta, or with inhibitors of beta-secretase or with inhibitors of gamma-secretase.

In a related aspect, the invention contemplates minimizing the peripheral effects of an intravenously injected active sheddase enzyme by using ADAM10-RAP (or CR-specific antibody) fusions with the prodomain attached. For example, intact pro-ADAM10-RAP can isolated from standard production lines by co-expression with the furin inhibitor, α1-antitrypsin Portland (Srour, et al. (2003) FEBS Lett 554, 275-283; Benjannet, et al. (1997) J Biol Chem 272, 26210-26218). Activation of the fusion will then occur by removal of the prodomain after clearance into tissue, either during transcytosis or upon reaching the brain interstitium. During transcytosis, the fusion becomes membrane associated due to association with LRP. The fusion-receptor complex then transits the cell within an endosome. Previous studies in vivo and in vitro have demonstrated partial proteolysis of some proteins in transit during transcytosis (Lisi, et al. (2003) J Endocrinol Invest 26, 1105-1110). Endocytosis of ADAM10-RAP either upon initial endocytosis into endothelial cells or on final endocytosis into neurons will expose the fusion to furin in the early endosome (Mayer, et al. (2004) J Histochem Cytochem 52, 567-579; Bosshart, et al. (1994) J Cell Biol 126, 1157-1172; Rohn, et al. (2000) J Cell Sci 113 (Pt 12), 2093-2101). An alternative approach to delayed activation of ADAM10 is replacement of the furin-sensitive peptide linker connecting the prodomain and catalytic domain with an ADAM-sensitive peptide linker. To the extent that the modified prodomain is cleaved in production lines, this reaction can be inhibited by culture in the presence of hydroxamate inhibitors or by co-expression with TIMP1 or TIMP3 (Amour, et al. (2000) FEBS Lett 473, 275-279). While the half-life of RAP fusions in the periphery is short, accumulation of an ADAM-sensitive pro-ADAM10-RAP fusion will result in exposure of the fusion to endogenous, active ADAM10 at the neuron surface within the interstitial space. A proteolytic chain-reaction might then be predicted, with each activated ADAM10-RAP fusion subsequently activating more ADAM10-RAP. Intracarotid co-administration with mannitol, as well as intrathecal administration, may not require inactive, ADAM10.

Parkinson's Disease is characterized by tremors and reduced motor neuron function, rigidity, and akinesia. These neurologic signs are due to malfunction of the major efferent projection of the substantia nigra, i.e., the nigrostriatal tract. The cell bodies of neurons in the dopaminergic system are the primary cells involved in PD progression. Examples of primary parkinsonian syndromes include Parkinson's disease (PD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and striatonigral degeneration (SND), which is included with olivopontocerebellear degeneration (OPCD) and Shy Drager syndrome (SDS) in a syndrome known as multiple system atrophy (MSA).

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), often referred to as “Lou Gehrig's disease,” is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that attacks motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. The progressive degeneration of the motor neurons in ALS eventually leads to their death, reducing the ability of the brain to initiate and control muscle movement.

Huntington's disease (HD), although a genetically heritable disease, results in the degeneration of neurons in the striatal medium spiny GABAergic neurons (Hickey et al., Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 27:255-65, 2003). This degeneration causes uncontrolled movements, loss of intellectual faculties, and emotional disturbance.

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a frequent and invalidating disease of the young adult. This disease is characterized by an inflammatory reaction, probably of an autoimmune type, and a demyelination frequently associated with a loss of oligodendrocytes, the myelin forming cell in the central nervous system. Current available treatments address the inflammatory factor of MS, but have little, if any, efficacy on remyelination.

The compositions of the invention are useful to treat cancers of the brain. The most common brain tumors are gliomas, which begin in the glial tissue. Astrocytomas, which arise from small, star-shaped cells called astrocytes, most often arise in the adult cerebrum. A grade III astrocytoma is sometimes called anaplastic astrocytoma. A grade IV astrocytoma is usually called glioblastoma multiforme. Brain stem gliomas occur in the lowest, stem-like part of the brain. The brain stem controls many vital functions. Most brain stem gliomas are high-grade astrocytomas. Ependymomas usually develop in the lining of the ventricles. They may also occur in the spinal cord. Oligodendrogliomas arise in the cells that produce myelin, the fatty covering that protects nerves. These tumors usually arise in the cerebrum. They grow slowly and usually do not spread into surrounding brain tissue. Medulloblastomas develop from primitive nerve cells that normally do not remain in the body after birth. For this reason, medulloblastomas are sometimes called primitive neuroectodermal tumors (PNET). Most medulloblastomas arise in the cerebellum; however, they may occur in other areas as well. Meningiomas grow from the meninges. They are usually benign. Because these tumors grow very slowly, the brain may be able to adjust to their presence; meningiomas often grow quite large before they cause symptoms. Schwannomas are benign tumors that begin in Schwann cells, which produce the myelin that protects the acoustic nerve. Acoustic neuromas are a type of schwannoma. Craniopharyngiomas develop in the region of the pituitary gland near the hypothalamus. They are usually benign; however, they are sometimes considered malignant because they can press on or damage the hypothalamus and affect vital functions. Germ cell tumors arise from primitive (developing) sex cells, or germ cells. The most frequent type of germ cell tumor in the brain is the germinoma. Pineal region tumors occur in or around the pineal gland. The tumor can be slow growing pineocytoma or fast growing (pineoblastoma). The pineal region is very difficult to reach, and these tumors often cannot be removed.

Treatment for a brain tumor depends on a number of factors. Among these are the type, location, and size of the tumor, as well as the patient's age and general health. Normally brain tumors are treated with surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. In one aspect, the invention provides a method of inhibiting growth and progression of neuroblastoma and neural tumors comprising administering to a subject having a neuroblastoma or neuronal tumor a composition comprising a RAP variant or CR-specific antibody of the invention. In an additional aspect the RAP variant or CR-specific antibody may be conjugated to an agent useful to treat neural tumors.

GDNF

In another preferred embodiment, the invention contemplates a method of treating neurodegenerative disease by administering RAP or RAP variants conjugated to a neuronal growth factor such as glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF). Such neurodegenerative diseases include but are not limited to Parkinson Disease. GDNF was originally purified from a rat glioma cell-line supernatant as a trophic factor for embryonic midbrain dopamine neurons. In vivo, GDNF homodimer binds to its receptor GFRα-1 (probably also a dimer), then the GDNF-GFRα-1 complex binds to the Ret protein, which dimerizes. The dimerization of Ret causes the autophosphorylation of tyrosine 1062. Studies showed that GDNF has pronounced effects on other neuronal subpopulations. Because GDNF protects dopamine neurons in animal models of Parkinson's disease, and rescues motoneurons in vivo, hopes have been raised that GDNF could be used as a therapeutic agent to treat several neurodegenerative diseases. However, GDNF does not cross the blood brain barrier. The present invention provides a method of transporting GDNF across the blood brain barrier comprising administering RAP or receptor specific RAP variants conjugated to GDNF.

v. Inhibition by CR-Specific Antibodies Tumors

In another specific embodiment, the invention contemplates a method of treating diseases comprising administering antibodies with selectivity for particular CR domains or combinations of CR domains. Overexpression of LRP5, LRP6 and matriptase (MT-ST1, ST14, TADG-15), is associated with increased tumorigenicity of the affected tissue (Li, et al., (2004) Oncogene 23, 9129-9135; Hoang, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 109, 106-111; Tanimoto, et al., (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-283; Santin, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 112, 14-25; Santin, et al., (2003) Cancer 98, 1898-1904; Tanimoto, et al., (2001) Tumour Biol 22, 104-114). Antibodies that bind to these tumorogenic CR-containing proteins may provide a means of diminishing their tumorigenic effects by direct interference with protein functions or by targeting tissues that overexpress these proteins with anti-tumor drugs attached to the selective molecule. Matriptase is anchored in the lateral or basolateral membranes of epithelial cells through an N-terminal type II transmembrane domain (Pfistermueller, et al. (1996) FEBS Lett 396, 14-20). The membrane-embedded sequence is followed by an extracellular SEA domain, two CUB domains, four CR domains and a trypsin domain at the C-terminus of the protein. Mutagenesis of the CR sequences within matriptase results in a failure of the resulting protease mutant to become activated (Qiu, et al. (2003) Neuroscience 122, 291-303). Similarly, an antibody that binds to the third CR domain of matriptase blocks activation of the enzyme (Basu, et al. (2001) Immunity 14, 303-13). A CR-specific antibody with affinity for one of the two CR pairs within matriptase that include the third CR domain would be expected to interfere with proteolytic activation, Such a variant would be expected to diminish the metastatic and tumorigenic effects of matriptase overexpression in affected tissues.

Osteoporosis

In a further embodiment, the invention contemplates the treatment of osteoporosis by administering a binding moiety, such as an antibody, that selectively binds the LDLR associated with maintenance of the bone and inhibits factors that prevent bone growth, development and maintenance. Enhanced Wnt signaling through the LDLR LRP5 is associated with an increase in osteoblast differentiation, inhibition of osteoclast activity and enhancement of bone deposition (Westendorf, et al. (2004) Gene 341, 19-39; Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684; Mizuguchi, et al. (2004) J Hum Genet 49, 80-86). Such signaling mechanism has been validated with osteoblast-specific APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) knockout mice and with LRP5 mutants that are insensitive to DKK (Dickkopf)-1 and sclerostin-mediated inhibition (Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684; Holmen, et al. (2005) J Biol Chem). The invention contemplates a method of treating osteoporosis or other diseases associated with reduced osteoblast activity and/or increased osteoclast activity by administering CR-specific binding moieties that selectively bind LRP5, interfering with inhibitor binding to LRP5, and/or enhancing Wnt signaling through LRP5.

A variety of hosts or subjects are treatable according to the subject methods. Generally such hosts are “mammals” or “mammalian,” where these terms are used broadly to describe organisms which are within the class mammalia, including the orders carnivore (e.g., dogs and cats), rodentia (e.g., mice, guinea pigs, and rats), and primates (e.g., humans, chimpanzees, and monkeys). In many embodiments, the hosts will be humans.

EXAMPLES

The following examples are included to demonstrate embodiments of the invention. It should be appreciated by those of skill in the art that the techniques disclosed in the example(s) that follows represent techniques discovered by the inventor to function well in the practice of the invention, and thus can be considered to constitute preferred modes for its practice. However, those of skill in the art should, in light of the present disclosure, appreciate that many changes can be made in the specific embodiments which are disclosed and still obtain a like or similar result without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The following examples provide exemplary protocols for generating, isolating and characterizing the interaction of RAP variants with their preferred receptors.

Example 1 Generation and Analysis of RAP Variants Materials and Methods

Materials—The M13 phage display vector was from Maxim Biotechnology. Expression vector pET30(+)a and S-tag purification reagents were from EMD Biosciences. Anti-RAP antibodies were produced at BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Inc. Restriction enzymes and T4 DNA ligase were from New England Biolabs. An ABI 3100 Avant automated DNA sequencer was used for sequence data generation and analysis. Hexahistidine tag purification reagents were from Qiagen. The anti-RAP polyclonal antibody was described previously (46).

Expression, refolding and purification of CR proteins—Studies have demonstrated that CR proteins can be expressed, purified and refolded to their native form in vitro (43, 47-51). A non-canonical CR pair from human LRP2 (CR 8 and CR9), a non-canonical CR triplet from human VLDLR (CR6-8) and a canonical CR triplet from human LRP1 (CR3-5) were used for the studies herein. The following CR sequences were also selected for this process: A CR triplet from LRP6 (CR1-3), the two CR pairs from LRP6 within the triplet (CR1 and 2, termed CR12, CR2 and 3, termed CR23), a CR pair from VLDLR (CR78), a CR triplet from LRP2 (CR34-36), a CR pairs from LRP2 (CR3435), three CR pairs from matriptase/ST14/TADG-15 (CR12, CR23 and CR34) and a CR triplet from LRP1 (CR3-5). DNA fragments encoding each were PCR amplified from human cDNA (BD Biosciences Marathon-Ready™ or from a previously-cloned LRP6 cDNA (9) using HotStart PfuTurbo™ (Stratagene) and the primers:

LRP6CR1F: (SEQ ID NO: 3) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C C C A A C A T G T T C T C C T C A G C A G T T T A C T T G T T T C A C G G G G G A A A T T G A C T G T A T C-3′; LRP6CR2R: (SEQ ID NO: 4) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A A A G C A C T T C A C A G T T C T T C T C A T C T G A T T T G T C C T G G C A G T T T G C A T C T C C A-3′; LRP6CR2F: (SEQ ID NO: 5) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C C C T G T A T G C T C A G A G T C C C A G T T C C A G T G T G C C A G T G G G C A G T G T A T T G A T G G-3′; LPR6CR3R: (SEQ ID NO: 6) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T C A C T A A G T C G G A T A A C A A T C C A G T T C A T C T G A C T T G T C A C T G C A A T C C A C-3′; VLDLRCR6F: (SEQ ID NO: 7) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C C A C A C C A A G T G T C C A G C C A G C G A A A T C C A G T G C G G C T C T G G C G A G T G C-3′; VLDLRCR7F: (SEQ ID NO: 8) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C A C T T G C C G A C C T G A C C A A T T T G A A T G T G A G G A T G G C A G C-3′; VLDLRCR8R: (SEQ ID NO: 9) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A T T C G T T T A T A T G A C A C T C T T T C A G G G G C T C A T C A C T C C A G T C C C T G-3′; LRP2CR8F: (SEQ ID NO: 10) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C C C C A C G G A G C A G T G T G G C T T A T T T T C C T T C C C C T G T A A A A A T G G C-3′; LRP2CR9R: (SEQ ID NO: 11) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A T G C G T G G G T G G G G C A G T T G T G C T C A T C A C T G C C A T C C A C A C A G T C G T T G C G T T T G-3′; LRP2CR34F: (SEQ ID NO: 12) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C G A T G G T G C A T A C T G C C A G G C T A C T A T G T T C G A A T G C A A A A A C C A T G T T T G T A T C C C G C-3′; LRP2CR35F: (SEQ ID NO: 13) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C G A T G T T C C C T G T A A T T C A C C A A A C C G T T T C C G G T G T G A C A A C A A T C G C T G C-3′; LRP2CR36R: (SEQ ID NO: 14) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A T A T A T T T T C A G C A C A T G T T C T T T C T T T T C C T T T A T T G C A A C C C A G T T C A T C G-3′; ST14F1: (SEQ ID NO: 15) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C C C A T G C C C G G G G C A G T T C A C G T G C C G C A C G G G G C G G T G T A T C-3′; ST14F2: (SEQ ID NO: 16) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C T G C G A C G C C G G C C A C C A G T T C A C G T G C A A G A A C A A G T T C T G C-3′; ST14F3: (SEQ ID NO: 17) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C A G T T G T C C G G C C C A G A C C T T C A G G T G T T C C A A T G G G A A G T G-3′; ST14R1: (SEQ ID NO: 18) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A A C C C C T G C T C G T C G C T G T T G T C T C C G C A G T C G T T C A C A C T G-3′; ST14R2: (SEQ ID NO: 19) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A A C T G C A C C C C T G C T C G T C G C T G T T G-3′; ST14R3: (SEQ ID NO: 20) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A G T C G C A G T C C T T C T C A T C T G A G C C G T C G C T A C A G T C C T C C T T C C C G-3′; LRP1CR3F: (SEQ ID NO: 21) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C C C C C A G T G C C A G C C A G G C G A G T T T G C C-3′; LRP1CR5R: (SEQ ID NO: 22) 5′-G C G A T A A G C T T T C A A T A G G C A C A C G A A G C A G A C T C A T C A G A G C G G-3′; 8D6AF: (SEQ ID NO:23) 5′-G C G A T A G G A T C C T C G T G C C C A C C C A C C A A G T T C C A G T G C C G C A C C A G T G G C T T A T G-3′; 8D6SAR: (SEQ ID NO: 24) 5′-G C G A T A A A G C T T T T A T C A T C C A C A G C C G A G C T C G T C G C T G G A G T C G G G A C-3′.

Each amplified fragment was sequentially digested with BamHI and HindIII and then ligated into similarly digested pET30(+)a. The resulting plasmids encode proteins consisting of N-terminal hexahistidine and S-peptides fused to the CR fragment. Ligation reactions were transformed into XL-Blue MRF′ (Stratagene) by electroporation and plasmids isolated from single colonies. Three mutations, Y1040W, V1047D and R1088D, were introduced into the LRP2 CR89 expression plasmid both singly and in combination using Stratagene QuikChange II XL reagents and the primers:

CR89YWF: (SEQ ID NO: 25) 5′-G T G C C C A A T T A C T G G C T C T G T G A T G G A G-3′; CR89YWR: (SEQ ID NO: 26) 5′-C T C C A T C A C A G A G C C A G T A A T T G G G C A C-3′; CR89V1047DF: (SEQ ID NO: 27) 5′-C T C T G T G A T G G A G A C G A T G A T T G T C A T G A T A-3′; CR89V1047DR: (SEQ ID NO: 28) 5′-T A T C A T G A C A A T C A T C G T C T C C A T C A C A G A G-3′; CR89R1088DF: (SEQ ID NO: 29) 5′-C A C A C T G G C G C T G T G A C A A A G A C A A C G A C T G T G T G G A T G G C-3′; CR89R1088DR: (SEQ ID NO: 30) 5′-G C C A T C C A C A C A G T C G T T G T C T T T G T C A C A G C G C C A G T G T G-3′.

All expression constructs were sequenced to verify insert sequences and the junctions with the expression vector. Each plasmid was then used to transform BL21 (DE3) CodonPlus-RIPL™ cells (Stratagene). Expression of the CR proteins was induced in logarithmic growth-phase cells grown in LB supplemented with 34 μg/mL chlorampbenicol, 12.5 μg/mL tetracycline and 15 μg/mL kanamycin by addition of 2 mM IPTG, followed by reduction in incubator temperature to 32° C. and incubation for 4 hours with agitation at 250×g. Cells were pelleted and resuspended, at 3.5% of the initial culture volume in 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8, 100 mM NaH₂PO₄, 8M Urea. Resuspended cells were then frozen in liquid nitrogen, rapidly thawed to 37° C. and sonicated for 10 seconds at an amplitude setting of 60 using a Cole-Parmer CP-130 ultrasonic processor connected to a 3 mm probe. This procedure was repeated three times to effect complete lysis of the cells. Lysates were clarified by spinning twice at 10,000×g in a Sorvall RC-5 centrifuge for 20 minutes at 15° C. Ni-NTA columns (Qiagen Superflow™, 1.5 mL packed bed) were used to purify the CR proteins. Briefly, the resin was equilibrated with two column volumes of lysis buffer. The clarified lysate was then supplemented to 20 mM with imidazole and incubated with the equilibrated Ni-NTA resin overnight at 4° C. The flow-through was discarded. Columns were washed once with one column volume of lysis buffer and then three times with one column volume of TBS pH 8 supplemented with 20 mM imidazole. CR-loaded beads were then removed from the column and CR proteins eluted by incubating at room temperature for 30 minutes with one column volume of the same buffer containing 200 mM imidazole. This step was repeated once and the eluates pooled. Eluted CR protein solutions were then supplemented to 2 M urea, 10 mM CaCl₂ and 5 mM DTT. Purified, denatured CR protein solutions were transferred to 3,500 MWCO Slide-A-Lyzer™ (Pierce) cassettes and sequentially dialyzed against a 200-fold excess of 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5, 10 mM CaCl₂, 1 mM reduced glutathione, 0.5 mM oxidized glutathione at room temperature overnight and then against TBS supplemented with 5 mM CaCl₂ at 4° C. overnight. Protein concentrations were determined by Bradford assay and purity confirmed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie Brilliant Blue staining.

Preparation of a RAP phage display library—The phage display phagemid phage 3.2 was modified to remove PflMI and HindIII sites within the pIII leader sequence using QuikChange II™ reagents (Stratagene). In addition, the polylinker of pHage 3.2 was modified by ligation to a double-stranded linker containing BamHI, NotI and AgeI sites. The resulting modified phagemid was called phage 3.6. A previously described vector for expression of a fusion between RAP and human α-L-iduronidase, pc3B-RAPIDU (46), was digested with BamHI and AgeI to obtain a DNA fragment encoding the human RAP sequence. This sequence begins at nucleotide 102 of the RAP cDNA and ends at nucleotide 1059. The encoded RAP protein lacks both the RAP signal peptide at the N-terminus and the HNEL endoplasmic reticulum retention signal at the C-terminus. In addition, there is an in-frame BamHI site at the 5′-end and an in-frame sequence encoding the peptide AEAETG, including an AgeI site, at the 3′-end. The RAP sequence was ligated into similarly digested phage 3.6, creating a fusion between the M13 pIII leader peptide, the RAP sequence and the pIII sequence. This construct was termed phage 3.6 RAP. Next, two positions within the third domain of RAP (RAP d3 K256 and K270) that had been previously reported to be important for receptor binding were mutagenized (52). These two positions were saturated by separate PCR amplification of the 5′ and 3′-halves of RAP d3 using pairs of normal and mutagenic primers:

RAP2KXF: (SEQ ID NO: 31) 5′-C C C T C G G A C G T C A G C G A C A T C A A G G G C A G C G T C C T G-3′; RAP2KX2: (SEQ ID NO: 32) 5′-C T C C A G C T G C T T C T G G T A G T G G T T G T G V N N C T C C T C G A T T T T G G C T T C G A A G T G C T T G A G C T C C T-3′; RAP2KX1: (SEQ ID NO: 33) 5′-A A G C A G C T G G A G A T T G C G C A C G A G N N B C T G A G G C A C G C A G A G A G C G T G G G C G A A C G G C-3′; and RAPmut1R: (SEQ ID NO: 34) 5′-G G T G C G G G G C C T C A C C G G T-3′.

The fragments were amplified from pc3B-RAPIDU. Each mutagenic primer replaces one of the selected lysine codons with one of 47 other codons or with one of the three possible stop codons. This substitution creates a pool of 2304 possible combinations of nucleotides and 441 possible combinations of amino acids (or termination codons). Both the RAP d3 5′ and RAP d3 3′-PCR fragments were digested with PvuII at a common site and then combined in a ligation reaction with T4 DNA ligase. A heterodimeric ligation product consisting of the 5′ and 3′-fragments fused at the PvuII site was resolved on FMC NuSieve GTG™ agarose gels and purified using Arnersham GFX™ reagents. The heterodimer was quantified by UV spectroscopy and subjected to further rounds of mutagenesis by error-prone PCR using the GeneMorph II EZ Clone™ reagents (Stratagene) and the primers RAPXF and RAPmut1R (described above). The heterodimer concentration was kept below 400 pg for each 50 μL reaction to maximize the final mutation frequency. Mutagenized DNA was digested with AgeI, purified by GFX, quantified by UV spectroscopy and used for ligase-free cloning into pHage 3.6 RAP using Stratagene EZclone™ reagents. Ligase-free cloning reaction products were purified using Qiagen MinElute™ columns. Aliquots of the purified ligase-free cloning products (3 μL) were used to transform 50 μL aliquots of XL10-Gold™ chemically-competent cells. Aliquots of the transformed cells were serially-diluted and plated on LB plates containing 100 μg/mL carbenicillin to determine the number of primary transformants. The remaining transformed cells were plated on Nunclon 25×25 cm dishes. A total of 119,500 primary transformant colonies were recovered from the dishes with the aid of 350 mL of Qiagen GigaPrep™ P1 buffer. Plasmid DNA was prepared using Qiagen reagents and protocols. The plasmid preparation was quantified and digested with BamHI and AgeI to confirm the presence of appropriately-sized insert.

Preparation of a RAP d3 mutant library—A RAP d3 mutant library was prepared by PCR using PfuUltra enzyme and reagents (Stratagene). RAP d3 libraries were generated by digesting plasmid DNA from the pHage 3.6 RAP mutant pool described above. The 5′ and 3′ halves of the d3 coding sequence were separately amplified using HPLC-purified primers

MORPHF4: (SEQ ID NO: 35) 5′-G G C C C A G A T C T A C C G G T T T C T G C C T C G G C-3′; D3HALFR2: (SEQ ID NO: 36) 5′-G T G C G C A A T C T C G A G C T G C T T C T G G T A G T G G T T G T G V N N C T C G A T T T T G G C V N N G A A G T G C T T G A G C T C C T C C C G G-3′; D3HALFF2: (SEQ ID NO: 37) 5′-C C A C T A C C A G A A G C A G C T C G A G A T T G C G C A C G A G N N B C T G A G G C A C G C A G A G A G C G T G G G C G A C G G C-3′; MORPHR3: (SEQ ID NO: 38) 5′-G A G T G C G G C C G C A A G C T T A T C T T C T G C C T C G G C-3′.

The primers replace codons at positions 251, 256 and 270 with NNB, resulting all possible amino acids at these positions. In addition, a PvuII site within the RAP d3 coding sequence was ablated with a single, silent, base substitution. Amplified fragments were purified using Amersham GFX reagents and then assembled by primer-less PCR using PfuUltra. The assembled pool of RAP d3 variants sequences was then quantified and subject to mutagenesis using GeneMorph II reagents (Stratagene). Mutagenized DNA was sequentially digested with BamHI, PvuII and AgeI with purification using GFX reagents after each reaction. The digested RAP d3 variant fragment pool was then ligated into similarly digested pHage 3.6 (see above). A plasmid library was prepared by transformation of XL10-Gold cells (Stratagene) and plating on 25×25 cm dishes of LB supplemented with carbenicillin. Colonies were recovered from the dishes and plasmid DNA prepared as above.

Preparation of phage-Plasmid libraries (10 ng) were used to transform XL-Blue MRF′ by electroporation. Following incubation for 1 hour at 37° C. in 1 mL of 2×YT supplemented with 2% glucose, cultures of transformed cells were supplemented to 100 μg/mL with carbenicillin and grown an additional 6 hours.

Following this interval the 1 mL culture was used to innoculate 10 mL of 2×YT supplemented with 2% glucose, 100 μg/mL carbenicillin and 10⁸ pfu/mL M13K07 helper phage (New England Biolabs) in a 50 mL Erlenmeyer flask. This culture was shaken at 250×g for 2 hours at 37° C., and then centrifuged in a Sorvall RC-5 centrifuge at 2,000×g for 10 minutes to pellet the cells. Cells were resuspended in 10 ml 2×YT with 100 μg/ml carbenicillin and 100 μg/ml kanamycin and shaken overnight at 37° C. Cultures were clarified by centrifugation twice at 10,000×g and supernatants collected. Phage were precipitated by combining the supernatant with one volume of cold TBS and 0.2 volumes of 2% PEG 8000 (Sigma), 2.5 M NaCl, collected by centrifugation at 10,000×g and resuspended in TBS. Phage titer was determined by serially-diluting phage samples, incubating with logarithmic phase XL-Blue MRF′ and plating on 2×YT agar supplemented with 100 μg/mL carbenicillin.

Phage panning-Purified, folded CR proteins were used to coat Nunc MaxiSorp™ 96-well plates at 1 μg/well overnight at 4° C. in TBS supplemented with 5 mM CaCl₂. Wells were rinsed and blocked with TBS Superblock™ (Pierce) supplemented with 5 mM CaCl₂ prior to addition of phage. Purified phage libraries of 10⁹ cfu (10¹⁰ cfu/mL) in TBS Superblock™ supplemented with 5 mM CaCl₂ and 0.05% Tween-20 were added to coated wells and incubated for 2 hours at room temperature. Wells were then washed fifteen times with TBSTC (201n M Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl supplemented with 5 mM CaCl₂ and 0.05% Tween-20). Bound phage were eluted in 0.2 M glycine-HCl pH 2.2 with 1 mg/ml BSA and transferred to tubes containing 0.2 volumes of 1M Tris-HCl pH 9.1 to bring the pH to neutrality. Eluted phage were recovered by mixing eluate with log-phase XL-Blue MRF′ cells. Rescued phage were amplified by growing cells in liquid culture at 30° C. overnight (16 hours). In addition, aliquots of transformed cells were titered by serially diluting the samples and plating on 2×YT agar containing 100 μg/mL carbenicillin. Phage were purified and concentrated from media supernatants by PEG precipitation.

Expression of RAP d3 proteins—RAP d3 sequences were PCR amplified using d3Rescue F: 5′-GCGATAGGATCCCTGGACCGCCTGCGCAG GGTCAGCCACC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 39) and d3 Rescue R: 5′-GCGATAA AGCTTTTATCAAGATCTACCGGTTTCTGCCTCGGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 40), digested with BamHI and HindIII and ligated into similarly digested pET30(+)a. RAP d3 proteins were expressed in BL21(DE3) CodonPlus-RIPL™ and purified by Ni-NTA chromatography as described above. Protein concentrations were measured by Bradford assay and purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE.

Sequential reversion of mutant RAP d3 and forward mutation of wild-type RAP d3—Each mutation within the affinity-selected RAP d3 variant was individually reverted to wild-type using Stratagene QuickChange II XL™ reagents and primers

V2AR1: (SEQ ID NO: 41) 5′-A G G G T C A G C C A C C A G G G C T A C A G C A C T G A G G C T A A G T T C G A G G A G C C C A G G G T G A T-3′; V2AR2: (SEQ ID NO: 42) 5′-C A G C C A C C A G G G C T A C A C C A C T G A G G C T G A G T T C G A G G A G C C C A G G G T G A T T G A G C-3′; V2AR3: (SEQ ID NO: 43) 5′-G G A G G C G T T C C G G G A G G A G C T C A A G C A C T T C A A A G C C A A A A T T G A G G C C C A C A A C C-3′; V2AR4: (SEQ ID NO: 44) 5′-C G T T C C G G G A G G A G C T C A A G T A C T T C G A A G C C A A A A T T G A G G C C C A C A A C C A C T A C-3′; V2AR5: (SEQ ID NO: 45) 5′-G C T C A A G T A C T T C A A A G C C A A A A T T G A G A A G C A C A A C C A C T A C C A G A A G C A G C T G G A; V2AR6: (SEQ ID NO: 46) 5′-A G A A G C A G C T G G A G A T T G C G C A C G A G A A G C T G A G G C A C G C A G A G A G C G T G G G C G A C G G-3′; V2ARR1: (SEQ ID NO: 47) 5′-A T C A C C C T G G G C T C C T C G A A C T T A G C C T C A G T G C T G T A G C C C T G G T G G C T G A C C C T-3′; V2ARR2: (SEQ ID NO: 48) 5′-G G T C A A T C A C C C T G G G C T C C T C G A A C T C A G C C T C A G T G G T G T A G C C C T G G T G G C T G-3′; V2ARR3: (SEQ ID NO: 49) 5′-G G T T G T G G G C C T C A A T T T T G G C T T T G A A G T G C T T G A G C T C C T C C C G G A A C G C C T C C-3′; V2ARR4: (SEQ ID NO: 50) 5′-G T A G T G G T T G T G G G C C T C A A T T T T G G C T T C G A A G T A C T T G A G C T C C T C C C G G A A C G-3′; V2ARR5: (SEQ ID NO: 51) 5′-C T C C A G C T G C T T C T G G T A G T G G T T G T G C T T C T C A A T T T T G G C T T T G A A G T A C T T G A G C-3′; V2ARR6: (SEQ ID NO: 52) 5′-C C G T C G C C C A C G C T C T C T G C G T G C C T C A G C T T C T C G T G C G C A A T C T C C A G C T G C T T C T-3′.

Wild-type RAP d3 was mutagenized using the same method and the following primers:

K256AF: (SEQ ID NO: 53) 5′-C T T C G A A G C C A A A A T C G A G G C G C A C A A C C A C T A C C A G A A G C-3′; K256AR: (SEQ ID NO: 54) 5′-G C T T C T G G T A G T G G T T G T G C G C C T C G A T T T T G G C T T C G A A G-3′; K270EF: (SEQ ID NO: 55) 5′-G C T G G A G A T T G C G C A C G A G G A G C T G A G G C A C G C A G A G A G-3′; K270ER: (SEQ ID NO: 56) 5′-C T C T C T G C G T G C C T C A G C T C C T C G T G C G C A A T C T C C A G C-3′; d3E251KF: (SEQ ID NO: 57) 5′-G A G G A G C T C A A G C A C T T C A A A G C C A A A A T C G A G A A G C A C A A C-3′; d3E251KR: (SEQ ID NO: 58) 5′-G T T G T G C T T C T C G A T T T T G G C T T T G A A G T G C T T G A G C T C C T C -3′; d3E217KF: (SEQ ID NO: 59) 5′-C A G G G C T A C A G C A C T G A G G G T A A G T T C G A G G A G C C C A G G G T G-3′; d3E217KR: (SEQ ID NO: 60) 5′-C A C C C T G G G C T C C T C G A A C T T A G C C T C A G T G C T G T A G C C C T G-3′; d3H249YF: (SEQ ID NO: 61) 5′-G T T C C G G G A G G A G C T C A A G T A C T T C G A A G C C A A A A T C G A G-3′; d3H249YR: (SEQ ID NO: 62) 5′-C T C G A T T T T G G C T T C G A A G T A C T T G A G C T C C T C C C G G A A C-3′.

Solid phase binding assays-Purified, refolded CR protein (1 μg) was bound to Nunc Maxisorp™ 96-well plates in TBS pH 8 supplemented with 5 mM CaCl₂ (TBSC) overnight at 4° C. Wells were washed with TBSC and then blocked with TBSC containing 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA). RAP ligands were then incubated with the immobilized receptor at a range of concentrations for 2 hours in the above blocking buffer supplemented with 0.05% Tween-20 at room temperature. Control wells contained no added ligand. As an additional control, to determine whether the absence of calcium affected binding, 10 mM EGTA was included in the incubation medium for some samples. Wells were washed with TBSTC and bound ligands detected with polyclonal anti-RAP (BP41/42, 1:1,000, BioMarin). Excess primary antibody was removed and wells washed before incubation with the secondary antibody, HRP-conjugated goat anti rabbit IgG (Bio-Rad). After washing, TMB substrate solutions (Bio-Rad) were added to detect HRP. Color development was stopped with 1N HCl. Absorption at 450 nm was measured with a microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). Data were plotted and K_(d) values derived by non-linear regression with the assumption of single-site binding (GraphPad Prism).

Results

In order to identify tandem CR pairs within the human proteome and to analyze those positions within the pairs that had been previously implicated in binding to RAP, sequences of 190 non-redundant human CR sequences identified in the Pfam database (pfam.wustl.edu) were transferred to a spreadsheet. Tandem pairs of CR sequences were then identified, with the only requirement for assignment as a pair being that the two CR sequences be immediately adjacent to each other within the primary sequence of the protein in which they were found. Imposition of a 75 amino acid limit on the distance between the first amino acids of each CR sequence, as defined in the Pfam database, adequately tested for this condition. The assumption of the requirement for a tandem arrangement was made since the preponderance of historical data on the binding of RAP to defined CR sequences involves such pairs. Overlapping pairs were included such that a linear array of three CR sequences comprised two CR pairs. There were 149 tandem CR pairs identified in this way. Sequence conservation in the area of the calcium-binding loop facilitated the next step in the analysis, extraction of four amino acids tied directly to RAP binding in previous studies (53, 54). These are equivalent to A and C from the A×cB×C×D motif of each CR sequence of a CR pair. The amino acid identities at positions A and C from the first CR sequence of each pair, along with the amino acids at positions A and C from the second CR sequence of each pair (henceforth, A′ and C′) were then concatamerized into a single, tetrameric text string (ACA′C′) for the purposes of comparison. The text strings for each CR pair were compared to those for all other CR pairs and the frequency of each counted. Of the 149 non-redundant human tandem CR pair sequences that were identified in this analysis, the most common combination of amino acids at A, C, A′ and C′ was WDWD, which was found 16 times. In addition, there were a total of four CR pairs with the WEWD signature, two with WEWE and six with WDWE, for a total of 28 fitting our definition of canonical CR pairs. The canonical CR pair signatures were found only in the LDLR family, specifically in VLDLR, LRP1, LRP1B, LRP2, LRP4, apoER2 and sortilin. All of these receptors have been previously shown to bind RAP with high affinity. In addition to redundant combinations of lower frequency, 101 unique combinations were identified, with all CR pair-containing proteins having at least one. Each tetrameric combination of amino acids at A, C, A′ and C′ was then generalized by assigning amino acids to one of six groups based on the approximate physico-chemical properties of their side-chains. Hydrophobic aliphatic amino acids were assigned to group 1 (I, L, M, V), small, hydrophilic amino acids to group 2 (A, C, G, P, S, T), basic amino acids to group 3 (H, K, R), acidic amino acids to group 4 (D, E), carboxamide amino acids to group 5 (N, Q) and aromatic amino acids to group 6 (F, W, Y). As before, each generalized combination was then compared to all other such combinations and their frequencies counted. The most common generalized combination was found to be 6464, with aromatic amino acids at A and A′ and acidic amino acids at C and C′. This group included all 28 of the specific canonical combinations, and accounted for 44 of the 149 CR pair combinations. Representatives of this class of CR pairs were found in ten proteins, including two outside of the LDLR family, corin and perlecan. A total of 57 of the generalized combinations were unique and, as before, at least one unique combination could be found in each LDLR receptor ectodomain, except for the VLDLR. Other proteins containing CR pairs with unique generalized combinations of amino acids at the selected positions included the transmembrane serine protease matriptase (MT-SP1, ST14, TADG-15) and the heparin sulfate proteoglycan protein, perlecan (25, 55).

From the large number of CR pairs with unique combinations of amino acids at A, C, A′ and C′ within the calcium-binding loop of each CR, CR pairs were selected to test their binding to RAP d3. CR combinations tested are set out in FIG. 3 (SEQ ID NO: 69-90). The CR pair in the FDC-8D6 protein, designated 8D6 CR12, is set out in SEQ ID NO: 91 (GSSCPPTKFQCRTSGLCVPLTWRCDRDLDCSDGSDEEECRIEPCTQKGQCPP PPGLPCPCTGVSDCSGGTDKKLRNCSRLACLAGELRCTLSDDCIPLTWRCDGH PDCPDSSDELGCG). The selected receptor fragments comprise single pairs or two overlapping pairs (triplets) of CR sequences and were meant to reflect the range of amino acid combinations at the selected positions. Taking into account that overlapping pairs might fold less efficiently than isolated pairs, one or both overlapping pairs making up each triplet were also expressed in some cases. Sequences included an LRP6 CR triplet, equivalent to amino acids 1247-1363 of full-length human LRP6 (Uniprot accession 075581), termed LRP6 CR1-3; both overlapping CR pairs comprising the LRP6 triplet, LRP6 CR12 and LRP6 CR23, amino acids 1247-1322 and 1323-1363; a fragment of the VLDLR, amino acids 235-358 (Uniprot accession P98155), termed VLDLR CR6-8; a CR pair within the VLDLR triplet, termed VLDLR CR78, containing amino acids 295-358; three CR pairs from the transmembrane serine protease matriptase, termed ST14 CR12, amino acids 452-524, ST14 CR23, amino acids 487-566 (Uniprot accession Q8WVC1) and ST14 CR34, amino acids 525-602; and, finally, a triplet from LRP1, termed LRP1 CR3-5, comprising amino acids 852-973 (Uniprot-accession P98157). LRP1 CR3-5 consists of two, overlapping canonical CR pairs with the WDWD signature, each of which has previously been demonstrated to bind to RAP d3 with high-affinity (53).

A number of previous studies have demonstrated that CR pairs and triplets can be expressed in bacteria and refolded in vitro into native structures (43, 47-51, 53, 54, 56-59). Each purified, refolded CR protein was expressed and analyzed by SDS-PAGE under both reducing and non-reducing conditions (FIG. 4). CR mobility was consistent with predicted molecular weight under reducing conditions, and each protein was judged to be >90% pure. Under non-reducing conditions, each CR protein migrated through the gel more quickly than expected for the predicted molecular weight. This observation is consistent with a compact folded structure dependent on intramolecular disulfide bond formation. While a number of possible disulfide bond combinations are possible, the studies cited above demonstrate that the native disulfide-bonding pattern is favored during refolding, especially in the presence of calcium (Mikhailenko, et al., (1999) J Cell Sci 112 (Pt 19), 3269-3281; Santin, et al., (2004) Int J Cancer 112, 14-25; Santin, et al., (2003) Cancer 98, 1898-1904). Non-reducing peptide mapping was performed on the LRP2 CR89 pair to demonstrate the presence of a folded form with the correct disulfide bonding pattern. Proteolysis followed by LC/MS demonstrated the presence of peptides consistent with the presence of the expected disulfide bonding pattern. In most cases, and taking into account the relatively low resolution of the electrophoretic analysis, the folded form of the CR protein appeared to be a single band (FIG. 4).

Initially, the binding of wild-type RAP to each CR pair or triplet was measured by solid-phase assay. Purified, refolded CR proteins were bound to Maxisorp plates during overnight incubation at 4° C. CR-loaded wells were blocked by resuspending in TBS Superblock (Pierce) supplemented with 5 mM CaCl2 (blocking buffer) and incubating for 1 hour at room temperature. Blocking buffer was removed and wells were washed once in TBS supplemented with 5 mM CaCl2 and 0.05% Tween-20 (wash buffer). Washed wells were incubated with 10 nM purified RAP-IDU (Tanimoto, et al., (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-283) for 2 hours at room temperature in blocking buffer. RAP-IDU has been demonstrated to bind to LDLR as efficiently as RAP (Tanimoto, et al., (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-283) and the IDU enzyme served as a convenient reporter for the assay. Wells were washed four times with wash buffer and resuspended in acidic PBS pH 5.6 supplemented with 200 μg/mL BSA (assay buffer). Iduronidase activity was measured as described previously using the fluorescent substrate 4-MU-α-L-iduronide (Tanimoto, et al., (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-283). No binding of RAP-IDU to empty wells was measured. Wild-type RAP bound with 3 nM affinity to LRP1 CR3-5, which contains two, overlapping, canonical, CR pairs (FIG. 5A). RAP bound more weakly to other CR proteins, with dissociation constants from 30 to over 1000 nM. These results confirmed that wild-type RAP binds to non-canonical CR pairs with much greater affinity than to canonical CR pairs.

Additional assays were performed to assess the binding of wild-type RAP d3 (SEQ ID NO: 92) to each CR pair or set of overlapping pairs was then measured by solid-phase assay (FIG. 5B). Diluted samples were incubated with each test protein, immobilized in multiwell plates. Binding assays were performed as described in Methods. Two independent experiments were performed with triplicate wells for each sample. Means and standard deviations were calculated from the combined values from both experiments and plotted against ligand concentration. Curves were fitted using non-linear regression with a single-site binding model (GraphPad Prism). K_(d) values with standard deviations were derived from the fitted curves. In all cases, 10 mM EGTA removed >85% of the mean binding signal at the highest concentration of ligand tested.

The apparent K_(d) for binding of RAP d3 to LRP1 CR3-5 in this assay was 11 nM, in the same range as values previously reported (53, 54, 60). RAP d3 binding to LRP6 CR12, LRP6 CR23, LRP6 CR1-3, VLDLR CR78, LRP2 CR3536, LRP2 CR34-36 and ST14 CR23 was less than 5% of that for LRP1 CR3-5 at the highest ligand concentrations tested. Binding of RAP d3 to ST14 CR12 and CR34, measured in a separate set of experiments, was also undetectable. RAP d3 binding to VLDLR CR6-8 and LRP2 CR89 was slightly higher, allowing curves to be reliably fitted to the binding isotherms. Nevertheless, apparent dissociation constants for binding of RAP d3 to these receptor fragments were over 300 nM.

Having established that RAP d3 does not bind to CR pairs containing unique combinations of amino acids within the calcium-binding loop, an affinity-selection system for mutants of RAP d3 that are able to bind such pairs was developed. Fusions of RAP to other proteins have been expressed in both mammalian and bacterial cells and have been demonstrated to retain the receptor-binding behavior of native RAP (46, 61, 62). Therefore, libraries of full-length RAP fused N-terminally to the M13 pIII structural protein were created, as has been previously done with other proteins (63). To create a pool of RAP mutants, two mutagenic procedures were applied to the third domain within the full-length RAP coding sequence. The codons for two positions previously demonstrated to participate directly in receptor binding, K256 and K270, were first subjected to saturation mutagenesis. Additional mutations were then randomly introduced into RAP d3 using error-prone PCR. Following these procedures, a total of 38 randomly-selected clones were sequenced to determine the mutation frequency. Ten clones (26%) had base insertions, deletions or substitutions that resulted in stop codons within the RAP sequence. Recombinant phage encoding such sequences will be favored during the processes of phage assembly and infection since only wild-type pIII becomes incorporated into the phage capsid. An additional four clones (11%) were found to encode wild-type RAP. The remaining 24 clones (63%) of the RAP phage-pIII fusions encoded RAP proteins with mutations in d3. None of these clones had the same combination of amino acids at positions 256 and 270, indicating that a range of substitutions had occurred as expected at these sites. The average mutation frequency exclusive of positions 256 and 270 was 2.4 amino acid substitutions within the last 110 amino acids of RAP (RAP d3). One of the 38 clones had an in-frame deletion of 7 codons while another had an in-frame insertion of unidentified sequence partly replacing the 3′-end of RAP d3. No mutations were found within d1 or d2 of RAP.

A second phage display library was prepared encoding only RAP d3. This library was generated in a similar fashion to the full-length RAP library, except that an additional position, 251, was subjected to saturation mutagenesis based the apparent importance of this site in a variant from an earlier screen (see below). Apart from positions 251, 256 and 270, the RAP d3 mutant library had an average mutation frequency of 2 amino acid substitutions within the last 110 amino acids of RAP. There was no apparent over-representation of wild-type RAP sequences in this library.

To test whether the phage panning system could be used to isolate RAP sequences based on affinity, a preparation of phage expressing wild-type RAP was diluted one thousand-fold into a preparation of phage expressing a mutant RAP (K256D, K270D) that was expected to have diminished LRP2 CR pair-binding ability (52). Panning was performed as described in Methods. Recovered phage were amplified and titered. The RAP d3 sequence from ten recovered colonies was sequenced. After a single round of panning, two of the ten colonies from the panning experiment contained wild-type RAP, an enrichment of 200-fold from the starting pool. As an additional test of the system using a more complex pool of sequences, RAP phage libraries in which positions 256 and 270 had been randomized were panned on LRP1 CR3-5. In the initial phage library, the wild-type RAP sequence was encoded by approximately one of 1.0 phage (based on sequencing of random clones prior to selection). Following the first round of panning, the wild-type RAP sequence was encoded by 7 of 10 phage. This result demonstrates a 7-fold enrichment for the selected sequence from a complex pool of sequences after one round of panning.

Concluding that RAP sequences could be isolated from phage display libraries by affinity selection, a CR pair that does not bind wild-type RAP, LRP2 CR89, was used as a panning substrate with the doubly-mutagenized full-length RAP phage library. After four rounds of panning, three of eight randomly chosen clones were identical. The common sequence had seven mutations: V175L, S213T, E217K, H249Y, E251K, K256A, K270E. A second group of four clones had identical substitutions at positions 256 and 270 (K256A, K270R), but had variable substitution patterns outside of these two sites. After a fifth round of panning, seven of eight randomly chosen clones had the previously-observed V175L, S213T, E217K, H249Y, E251K, K256A, K270E mutation set. All mutations for this sequence, termed RAPv2A (SEQ ID NO: 93) were in the d3 region specifically mutagenized to make the variant library.

To confirm that library resolution had occurred as a result of affinity selection, RAP and RAPv2A phage were prepared and assayed for binding to LRP2 CR89 (FIG. 6). With identical starting titers, 2.6-fold more colony forming units (cfu) were recovered by panning with RAPv2A phage than with wild-type RAP phage. Similar results were obtained when bound phage were detected with an anti-pIII antibody, indicating that differences in infectivity between the two phage were not responsible for differences in the titers of recovered phage. By conducting the binding reaction in the presence of 50 mM EDTA, RAPv2A binding was determined to be dependent on calcium, consistent with the requirement for an ordered CR fold as the receptor. Since both RAP and RAPv2A phage had identical d1 sequences and d2 sequences that differed by a single, conservative substitution (V175L), we hypothesized that differences in d3 were responsible for improvements in binding to LRP2 CR89. Accordingly, RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 were subcloned and expressed for subsequent binding analyses. Since the d3 regions expressed for further study comprised amino acids 201-319 of mature RAP, the effect of the V175L mutation on the binding behavior of RAPv2A was not determined.

Next, binding of RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 proteins to LRP1 CR3-5 and LRP2 CR89 was assessed. In order to understand the relative contributions of each RAPv2A d3 mutation to differences in affinity, we also prepared a number of RAPv2A d3 revertants and RAP d3 forward mutants, all comprising sequence variants intermediate between RAPv2A d3 and wild-type RAP d3 (FIGS. 7A and B, Table 1). Samples were tested in triplicate and experiments were repeated at least once. Values from different experiments were combined and a single mean and standard deviation obtained for each concentration of ligand tested. OD values from uncoated wells, receptor-coated wells incubated with buffer alone, and uncoated wells incubated with the highest ligand concentration all gave similar values for all conditions tested. All OD values were corrected by subtracting the OD obtained from uncoated wells.

In all cases, 10 mM EGTA prevented binding of both RAP d3 and RAP v2A d3 to CR proteins. Since calcium was the only divalent metal ion present in the binding buffer, this observation is consistent with both RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 binding to calcium-loaded CR pairs. RAP d3 bound LRP1 CR3-5 with a dissociation constant of 16 nM and showed no significant affinity for LRP2 CR89, consistent with the data represented in FIG. 5. Conversely, RAPv2A d3 bound LRP2 CR89 with an apparent dissociation constant of 38 nM but with no significant affinity for LRP1 CR3-5. Therefore, wild-type RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 have inverted binding preferences for these two receptor fragments. Two RAPv2A d3 revertants, T213S and K217E had slightly improved affinities for LRP2 CR89 and remained unable to detectably bind LRP1 CR3-5. Three RAPv2A d3 revertants, Y249H, K251E and A256K, failed to bind either receptor fragment, indicating that the mutations were important for the interaction between RAPv2A d3 and LRP2 CR89 and were not individually responsible for disrupting binding to LRP1 CR3-5. Interestingly, the E270K revertant bound both receptor fragments with higher affinity than RAPv2A d3, giving apparent dissociation constants of 8 nM for LRP2 CR89 and 142 mM for LRP1 CR3-5. Since the RAPv2A d3 mutant was selected based on affinity for LRP2 CR89, this result is consistent with the diversity of the starting library being insufficient to account for all possible sequence variants. Alternatively, the affinity differences between RAPv2A d3 and RAPv2A d3 E270K may have been insufficient to allow the latter to predominate upon iterative panning. A double revertant, T213S, E270K, had binding behavior that was not distinguishable from RAPv2A d3 in our assays. Since the two single-site revertants at these positions appeared to show improved affinity for LRP2 CR89, and in the case of E270K, LRP1 CR3-5 also, this result indicates a lack of additivity for binding effects resulting from these reversions or a lack of accuracy within this affinity range in our assays. The binding behavior of the K251E, E270K double revertant implies a strong dependence of the affinity of RAPv2A d3 for LRP2 CR89 on the E251K mutation. The difference in LRP2 CR89 affinity between this revertant and the single-site E270K revertant is almost 20-fold. The A256K, E270K double revertant results in a 2-fold loss of affinity for LRP2 CR89, implying a moderately positive effect that the K256A RAPv2A d3 mutation has on affinity for this fragment. However, the most striking difference between this double revertant and the E270K single-site revertant is the nearly 30-fold improvement in affinity for LRP1 CR3-5. Therefore, the K256A mutation in RAPv2A d3 is a crucial determinant of the ability of this variant to discriminate between the two receptor fragments, exerting its effect by negatively impacting affinity for LRP1 CR3-5 while at the same time improving affinity for LRP2 CR89.

Of the RAP d3 forward mutants tested, only the combination of E251K, K256A and K270E resulted in measurable affinity for LRP2 CR89. The apparent dissociation constant for binding of this triple mutant to LRP2 CR89 was 114 nM, still relatively high compared to RAPv2A d3. This affinity difference would presumably close further with the addition of the H249Y mutation. Single-site RAP d3 mutants at 217, 249 and 251 had minimal effects on binding LRP1 CR3-5 and did not bring affinity for LRP2 CR89 into the measurable range. The K270E mutation, either alone or in combination with E251K, K256A or both, failed to measurably bind LRP1 CR3-5. The significant negative impact of K256A or K270E on binding of RAP d3 to LRP1 have been previously reported in a study on loss-of-function RAP mutants (52). The results reported here are consistent with this work. Overall, the positive contributions of the mutations at 249, 251 and 256 in RAPv2A d3 toward binding of LRP2 CR89 and the negative contributions of mutations at 256 and 270 on binding to LRP1 CR3-5 seem to primarily account for the differences between RAPv2A d3 and wild-type RAP d3 in binding to the two receptor fragments.

One premise of this work was that amino acids at A, C, A′ and C′ within the calcium-binding loops of a CR pair were key determinants of binding affinity for RAP and would be similarly important for binding of RAP variants. To test this idea, we prepared mutants of LRP2 CR89 in which the native, non-canonical residues at these positions were sequentially substituted with the non-native, canonical residues. As defined above, the A, C, A′, C′ string for LRP2 CR89 is YVWR. Mutants included LRP2 CR89 Y1042W (WVWR), LRP2 CR89 V1047D (YDWR), LRP2 CR89 R1088D (YVWD), LRP2 CR89 V1047D R1088D (YDWD), LRP2 CR89 Y1042W V1047D R1088D (WDWD), LRP2 CR89 Y1042W V1047D (WDWR), LRP2 CR89 Y1042W R1088D (WVWD). Binding to both RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 were measured for each LRP2 CR89 mutant by solid-phase assay. Samples were tested in triplicate. The mean and standard deviation obtained for each concentration of ligand tested is shown in FIG. 8. OD values from uncoated wells, receptor-coated wells incubated with buffer alone, and uncoated wells incubated with the highest ligand concentration all gave similar values for all conditions tested. All OD values were corrected by subtracting the OD obtained from uncoated wells. Data were plotted and fitted by non-linear regression with the assumption of a single binding site (GraphPad Prism). K_(d) values with standard deviations were derived from the regression analysis.

Binding studies showed that only the YVWD mutant retained significant binding to RAPv2A d3, with an approximate 2-fold loss of affinity relative to LRP2 CR89 (FIG. 8 and Table 2). The position C mutant, with the tetrameric sequence string of YDWR failed to bind measurably to RAPv2A d3 as did all other single mutations or combinations of mutations involving either A or C. Interestingly, the nominally conservative Y1042W mutation alone was sufficient to prevent binding of RAPv2A d3. The A′ position in LRP2 CR89 is a tryptophan, the canonical residue for wild-type RAP d3 binding, and was not mutated in our studies. While substitution of amino acids at A, C and C′ had a strong negative impact on binding of RAPv2A d3, these substitutions did not greatly improve affinity for RAP d3, despite substitution with amino acids preferred by RAP d3 in other CR pairs such as LRP1 CR56. We did see a small increase in binding of RAP d3 to the WVWD and WDWD combinations at A, C, A′ and C′. These results suggest that while some amino acids in the calcium-binding loop are important for defining RAP and RAPv2A binding behavior, they are not sufficient to do so alone. The amino acids found at several residues within the d3 region of RAPd3 and RAPv2A variant sequence are depicted in Table 3.

Binding experiments were also carried out comparing the binding of RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 to an array of CR pairs (FIG. 9), similar to the experiment depicted in FIG. 5. For these experiments, RAP d3 and RAPv2A d3 (or RAPv2 d3) were each incubated at 80 nM concentrations with LRP1 CR3-5, LRP6 CR12, LRP6 CR23, LRP6 CR1-3, LRP2 CR89, LRP2 CR2728, LRP2 CR3031, LRP2 CR3435, LRP2 CR34-36, VLDLR CR78, VLDLR CR6-8, MAT CR12, MAT CR23 and MAT CR34. Samples were tested twice, in duplicate, and values combined. Means and standard deviations were then calculated. Blank values obtained from wells incubated in the absence of ligand were used to correct absorbance data. Coefficients of variance (CV) did not exceed 20% (mean of 6%) for any condition tested and are not shown.

These results demonstrate that RAP variant RAP v2A d3 is specific LRP2 CR89 and does not cross-react with other LRP2 CR pairs or CR pairs from other related proteins. This indicates that RAP v2A d3 is a potent and specific inhibitor of LRP2 activity and shows potential as a therapeutic inhibitor of LRP2 activity.

Example 2 Evaluation of RAP Variants and CR-Specific Antibodies Using in Vitro and In Vivo Assays

LRP2-selective RAP variants and CR-specific antibodies are useful as therapeutic agents or to transport therapeutic or diagnostic agents across the blood-brain barrier or other types of tissue membranes to treat a variety of human conditions or disorders. In vitro activity or transport assays and in vivo measurement of RAP variant activity or distribution are examples of methods to assess the efficacy of RAP variants. Examples of such assays are disclosed below.

Preparation of CR-specific antibodies binding to any of the repeated CR domains described herein may be carried out using any means known in the art, and antibodies thus prepared may be screened for relatively higher binding to the desired CR pairs compared to other CR pairs. Antibodies thus selected will then be tested for binding to the desired CR-containing protein compared to one or more other CR-containing proteins in the family. Antibodies that meet these criteria can then be assayed, alone or conjugated to other active agents, for ability to target to desired tissues, alteration of receptor activity, and/or prevention or treatment of disease in exemplary assays as described below.

In vivo anti-tumor assays using matriptase-selective antibodies—To assess the antagonistic effect that matriptase-selective antibodies have on tumor formation and progression, at least two in vivo models can be used. The first model utilizes nude mice innoculated with human tumor cell lines and is well-described in the literature. This system is useful for testing the ability of anti-CR antibodies specific for matriptase to slow tumor progression. The second model utilizes a transgenic mouse model that overexpresses mouse matriptase under control of the keratin promoter, restricting expression to epithelial tissues. This model has also been described previously (List et al., Genes and Development, 2005, 19:1934-1950).

In vitro transport assays of LRP2-selective RAP using recombinant MDCK cells—To assess the transport of RAP variants across cell membranes, in vitro transport assays are used. Stably-transfected MDCK cells expressing a minireceptor of human LRP2 (LB2) are cultured in vitro. These cells are plated on Transwell polyacetate membrane inserts (Costar, Cambridge, Mass.) having a uniform pore size of 0.4 μm. Cells are seeded at a density of 2×10⁵/ml and cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS. Medium is changed every three days. The cells are maintained in a 5% CO₂ incubator at 37° C. Transcytosis studies are performed in triplicate. Twenty minutes before the transport assay, the Transwell insert is equilibrated in transport buffer (Hank's balanced salt solution with 25 mM HEPES and 0.1% albumin) at 37° C. Transport is initiated by addition of ¹²⁵I-RAP variant (1 μCi/ml) and ⁹⁹mTc-albumin (2 μCi/ml) to the upper or lower chambers. The plate is maintained at 37° C. with gentle agitation at 130 rpm during the entire procedure. At 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 minutes following addition of labeled protein, a 10 μl of sample is collected from the lower chamber and upper chambers of each well. At 60 minutes, the entire solution in the upper and lower chambers is transferred to separate test tubes on ice. The total radioactivity from ¹²⁵I and ⁹⁹mTc is measured simultaneously in a γ-counter with a dual-channel program. The amount of intact RAP and albumin after transport is measured by acid precipitation and comparison of radioactive counts in the soluble and insoluble fractions of the sample.

Measurement of tissue distribution of RAP and RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies in mice—The tissue distribution of RAP variants or CR-specific antibodies in tissue samples from treated animals is measured.

Male CD1 mice, weighing 25-35 grams (Charles River Laboratories), are anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital 30 mg/kg and ketamine 30 mg/kg. Each mouse receives a bolus injection of ¹²⁵I-RAP or RAP variant and ¹³¹I-albumin as a vascular space marker (1 μCi of each labeled protein in lactated Ringers with 1% albumin) through the left jugular vein. At designated intervals (1-60 minutes after injection), blood is collected by cutting the right common carotid artery, and the mouse was decapitated. Brain and peripheral tissue samples are collected and assayed for weight and radioactivity. Volumes of distribution are calculated as using techniques well-known in the art. A decrease in radioactivity in tissue samples indicates that the RAP variant is competing for binding with the labeled wild-type RAP and is internalized instead of wild-type RAP. Similar assays can be carried out with CR-specific antibody.

Measurement of the anti-proliferative effects of LRP6-selective antibodies in cell proliferation assays-LRP6 overexpression has been correlated with increased tumorigienicity. Antibodies specific for CR-containing protein LRP6 may be useful to inhibit LRP6 interaction, or to deliver drug to LRP6 expressing cells. To examine the ability of said antibodies to modulate LRP6-mediated cell-proliferation, cell proliferation assays are performed.

HT1080 cells transfected with an LRP6 expression construct (Li, (2004) Oncogene 23, 9129-9135) seeded into 6-well plates (5×10⁴ cells per well). Anti-CR-protein antibodies and other test compounds are included in the growth medium at 5-50 nM. Medium is changed and cells harvested each day. Cells are counted and scored for viability using a Vi-Cell cell analysis system. Doubling times under the various test conditions are obtained by non-linear regression using GraphPad Prism software. A decrease in cell proliferation in the presence of CR-specific antibodies indicates the CR-specific antibodies are effective inhibitors of LRP6 induced cell proliferation.

Measurement of the anti-proliferative effects of LRP6-selective antibodies in soft agar colony assays-HT1080 cells tranfected with an LRP6 expression construct are cultured in 6-well plates coated with an agar layer (DMEM medium with 0.5% agar and 5% FBS). Cell are seeded within a second layer containing 2×10³ cells in DMEM with 0.33% agar and 5% FBS. The agar and cells are overlaid with medium to prevent drying. Test compounds, including LRP6-specific antibodies, are added directly to the medium and allowed to incubate with the cells. Medium is exchanged every three days. Triplicate wells are prepared for each cell line. After 3 weeks of incubation, colonies larger than 0.1 mm in diameter are scored. A decrease in colony formation in the presence of RAP variants indicates that RAP variants are effective inhibitors of LRP6 induced cell proliferation.

Measurement of the anti-tumor effects of CR-selective antibodies in a nude mouse model of tumorigenicity—To examine the effects of CR-specific antibodies on LRP6, matriptase or FDC-8D6 antigen inhibition in vivo, an experimental animal model of tumorigenicity is used.

Female athymic nude mice (4-5 weeks old) (Harlan Sprague-Dawley) (Indianapolis, Ind.). are injected subcutaneously in the flank (9) with HT1080 cells transfected with an LRP6 expression construct (6×10⁶ cells in 200 μL of serum free DMEM with 50% Matrigel matrix (BD Biosciences)), CWR22R prostate carcinoma cells (matriptase) (Galkin et al., (2004) Prostate 61, 228-35.) or L3055 Burkitt's lymphoma cells (FDC-8D6 antigen) (Li et al., 2004, supra). CR-selective antibodies, or vehicle alone, are administered by tail vein injection in sterile PBS every other day to mice receiving tumor cells or control animals. Tumor size are measured every 7 days, and tumor volumes calculated using width (a) and length (b) measurements (a2×b/2, where a<b).

Measurement of the effects of LRP5-specific antibodies on LRP5-dependent Wnt signaling in cultured osteoblasts—Wnt signaling through LRP5 has been demonstrated to increase osteoblast differentiation, inhibit osteoclast activity and enhance bone deposition (Westendorf, (2004) Gene 341, 19-39; Zhang, et al., (2004) Mol Cell Biol 24, 4677-4684; Mizuguchi, et al., (2004) J Hum Genet. 49, 80-86). Because anti-CR protein antibodies may bind to CR in LRP5, anti-LRP5 antibodies may be useful to modulate Wnt signaling through the receptor. The ability of anti-LRP5 antibodies to modulate Wnt signaling is measured using cultured osteoblasts.

Osteoblast cell lines MG63 expresses large amounts of LRP1 and no VLDLR. SAOS-2 cells express large amounts of VLDLR and almost no LRP1 (American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) Accession #HTB-85. MG63 and SAOS-2 cells are grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS at 37° C. in 10% CO2. Media are supplemented with Wnt7a to induce the Wnt signaling pathway, along with buffer, DKK-1, Mesd, or anti-CR-protein antibodies. After washing in ice-cold PBS, cells are collected and homogenized in a glass Dounce homogenizer with 100 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 140 mM NaCl, 2 mM DTT, 2 mM PMSF, and 1× Complete™ protease inhibitors (500 μl/well). The homogenate is centrifuged for 10 minutes at 500×g, and the supernatant is further centrifuged at 100,000×g at 4° C. for 90 minutes. The β-catenin levels are measured in the clarified supernatant by Western blotting using β-catenin-specific antibody from Cell Signaling Technology. The immunoreactive proteins are detected using the ECL system. Alternatively, cells are first transfected with 0.5 μg of the TOP-FLASH TCF luciferase construct (Upstate Biotechnology) along with 0.5 μg of β-catenin-expressing vector, 0.5 μg of Wnt1-expressing vector, or empty pcDNA3 vector. A β-galactosidase-expressing vector (Promega, Madison, Wis.) is included as an internal control for transfection efficiency. After 48 hours, media is changed and either buffer, DKK-1, Mesd, or anti-CR-protien antibody is added. After incubating for an addition 6 hours, cells are lysed and both luciferase and β-galactosidase activities determined with enzyme assay kits (Promega). The luciferase activity is determined with a luminometer using the Dual Luciferase Assay system (Promega). Luciferase activity is normalized to the activity of the β-galactosidase.

Example 3 Production and Characterization of a RAP-GDNF Fusion as a Potential Therapeutic Agent

Production of RAP-GDNF in CHO cells—A recombinant CHO cell line expressing RAP-GDNF was maintained in UltraCHO medium with 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 400 μg/mL G418, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin. For medium-scale culture with microcarriers in 500 mL spinner flask, 4000 cells/mL were added to 0.3 g of Cytopore beads in solution into 150 mL of JRH 302 medium, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 400 μg/mL G418, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin. The serum concentration was progressively decreased to zero and RAP-GDNF production followed for 2 weeks. The medium was changed daily, cell growth was evaluated by measuring glucose consumption (YSI 2700 analyzer) and RAP-GDNF production was quantified by functional ELISA. For adaptation in suspension culture without serum, 40,000 cells/mL were seeded into 20 mL of JRH 302 medium, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 400 μg/mL G418, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin, in 12 L shaker. When the viability was stable, the serum concentration was progressively decreased to zero and the cells were passaged at a density of 2000 cells/mL. Before decreasing serum concentration and when the culture was serum free, a batch culture was performed with the aim of defining the characteristics of RAP-GDNF production and to select the best producer clone. Cell density, viability and RAP-GDNF production were monitored for 4 days, without changing the media.

Functional ELISA-GFRα-1 (R&D Systems) was immobilized in a 96-well micro-titer plate (Nunc MaxiSorp) by coating each well with 1 μg of receptor in 100 μL of 20 mM carbonate buffer (pH 8.2) at 4° C. overnight. Except for the coating step, all procedures were performed at room temperature. After each step, wells were washed three times with DPBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. The ELISA plates were incubated for 2 hours with 20 μL of blocking buffer (Block & Sample Buffer, Promega). RAP-GDNF fusions and rhGDNF standard (Promega) were diluted in the blocking buffer, and then added to each well. After incubating for 2 hours, the unbound material was removed by washing and bound protein detected with anti-GDNF mAb diluted at 1:2,000 in blocking buffer. After an one hour incubation, immune complexes were detected by adding secondary antibody (anti-mouse IgG (H+L), HRP conjugate, Promega), for 1 hour, followed by colorimetric assay using TMB one solution (TMB Stabilized Substrate for Horseradish Peroxidase, Promega). Hydrochoric acid was used to halt color development. The optical density (OD) of each well was measured at 450 nm within 30 minutes of stopping the reaction (SPECTRAmax, Molecular Devices). This method allows for the accurate quantitation of RAP-GDNF in complex mixtures.

Solid-phase binding assays-Microtiter plates were coated with GDNF or RAP-GDNF in 50 mM sodium carbonate, pH 9.6. The plates were then blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with blocking buffer (Promega) and incubated with serial dilutions of GFRα-1 (0-10 nM) in the presence or the absence of 1 μM RET (2 hours, ambient temperature). Complexes were identified by probing with an anti-GDNF monoclonal antibody (B8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and then with anti-mouse HRP conjugate (Bio-Rad). After adding TMB solution (Bio-Rad), the color development was stopped with HCl and the OD 450 nm was measured using a plate reader. Between steps, the plates were washed three times with DPBS containing 0.1% Tween 20. This method provides a method for quantitating the affinity of RAP-GDNF for GFRα.

Tyrosine phosphorylation assays-Prior to the beginning of the experiment (48 hours), flasks were seeded with SK—N—SH cells (ATCC HTB-11). Cells were treated with 1 μM retinoic acid (Sigma) to increase the level of RET expression 12 hours prior to addition of RAP-GDNF or GDNF. Cells were incubated for 1 hour at 37° C. in serum-free medium (MEM, 2 mM glutamine, 1 mg/mL BSA). Then, cells were incubated with or without GDNF standard (10 ng/mL) or RAP-GDNF (ng/mL) and soluble GFRα—1 (1 ng/mL) for 15 minutes at 37° C. Cells were then washed with ice-cold PBS, incubated for 10 minutes on ice with ice-cold lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1% IGEPAL, 0.01 M vanadate, 0.5% deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris HCl pH 8.0, Complete™ protease inhibitor cocktail) and harvested by scraping. The cell lysate was centrifuged for 15 minutes at 3,000 RPM at 4° C. Clear lysates were transferred into fresh tubes. Anti-GDNF, GFRα-1, RET or phospho-tyrosine antibodies were added to the lysates and incubated for 2 hours at 4° C. with shaking. Protein G sepharose (Fast Flow, Amersham Biosciences) was then added to the tubes and incubated 2 hours at 4° C. with shaking. Beads were then washed twice with lysis buffer and once with PBS. The immunoprecipitated proteins were released by boiling the beads in SDS sample buffer (NuPAGE® LDS Sample Buffer, Invitrogen) for 5 minutes, separated on NuPAGE® Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris Gels (Invitrogen) and probed with either anti-RET (C-19 or H-300, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-phosphotyrosine (recombinant 10, Upstate), anti-phospho-RET (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-GDNF (B8, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-GDNF (D20, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-GFRα1 (R&D Systems) or anti-RAP (polyclonal, BioMarin). Alternatively, immobilized anti-RAP (previously washed twice and two fold diluted with lysis buffer) was added to cell lysate. The mixture was incubated for 3 hours at 4° C. with shaking. Anti-RAP beads were then washed twice with lysis buffer and once with PBS. The immunoprecipitated proteins were released by boiling the beads in SDS sample buffer (NuPAGE® LDS Sample Buffer, Invitrogen) for 5 minutes, separated on a NuPAGE® Novex 4-12% Bis-Tris Gel (Invitrogen) and probed with similar antibodies. This method measures the functionality of RAP-GDNF with respect to receptor tyrosine kinase activation.

Cell differentiation assays-PC-12 cells were maintained in F-12 medium (ATCC) with 10% fetal horse serum, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, penicillin and streptomycin. For neurite outgrowth experiments, cells were plated on to 1 mm coverslips that had been coated for 1 hour in 60 μL of 10 μg/mL EHS laminin (Sigma) in F-12 medium with 10% fetal horse serum, 2.5% fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 10 μg/mL GFRα1-Fc chimera (R&D Systems), penicillin and streptomycin, at the bottom of 24-well plates (the coating solution was removed before the cells were added). Cells were then incubated for 3-4 days in the presence or the absence of different concentrations of GDNF or RAP-GDNF (10, 100, 1000 ng/mL), 3M sodium chlorate (Sigma), heparinase III or chondroitinase ABC (Sigma). Qualitative responses were noted by evaluating the level of differentiation as a function of the number and size of the neurites.

Results

Western blotting results indicated that RAP-GDNF was secreted as a disulfide-linked homodimer, like GDNF (FIG. 10). Binding experiments demonstrated that the RAP-GDNF/GFRα-1 complex had a dissociation constant of approximately 5 ng/mL, or 5 pM (molecular weight of RAP-GDNF is approximately 120 kD, FIG. 11). This value is close to that reported for the GDNF/GFRα-1 complex in the literature.

Tyrosine phosphorylation assays—In vivo, GDNF homodimer binds to its receptor GFRα-1 (probably also a dimer), then the GDNF-GFRα-1 complex binds to the Ret protein, which dimerizes. The dimerization of Ret causes the autophosphorylation of tyrosine 1062. Since RAP-GDNF was shown to bind to GFRα-1, the next step was to demonstrate that the RAP-GDNF fusion protein was also able to bind Ret and induce autophosphorylation. The human neuroblastoma line SK—N—SH was exposed to different concentrations of RAP-GDNF or GDNF in combination with GFRα-1, and the level of Ret phosphorylation was determined by immunoprecipitation. A series of positive and negative controls were tested to ensure that the experimental conditions allowed detection of Ret phosphorylation. Immunoprecipitation (FIG. 12) showed the phosphorylation of Ret only occurred when GDNF and GFRα-1 were been added together; the activation of Ret was evidenced by a phosphorylated protein of about 160 Da, the expected size for Ret, that co-stained on blots with an anti-Ret antibody. Different concentrations of standard GDNF were tested to ascertain whether this assay could be quantitative as well as qualitative (FIG. 12). The intensity of this band increased with the quantity of GDNF added. This experiment shows that the immunoprecipitation assay allows both qualitative and quantitative studies on GDNF-induced phosphorylated of Ret.

Immunoprecipitation of the ternary complex—The autophosphorylation of Ret occurs when the GDNF/GFRα-1 complex binds to Ret. If RAP-GDNF functions similarly, a ternary complex involving RAP-GDNF/GFRα-1 and Ret should be detectable. FIG. 13 shows the results from experiments designed to detect this complex. Using an anti-RAP antibody-agarose conjugate, we were able to purify the three components of the complex containing activated Ret. These results are consistent with the direct interaction of these proteins. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of Ret shown here is consistent with activation by RAP-GDNF.

Differentiation assay-Previous results had shown that the RAP-GDNF fusion protein was able to bind to its receptor and to activate Ret. Further downstream events can be confirmed through the induction of cell differentiation. Increasing concentrations of GDNF or RAP-GDNF were added to PC12 cells. Since these cells adhere poorly to plastic and tend to growth in large clusters, coverslips previously coated with laminin and GFRα-1 were used. The level of differentiation was evaluated by the presence, the quantity and the size of neurites. RAP-GDNF, like GDNF, was able to induce neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. FIGS. 14 a and b illustrates the differentiation resulting from the addition of RAP-GDNF. The level of differentiation was observed to be a function of the quantity of GDNF or RAP-GDNF added. The apparent level of induced differentiation was the same with same approximate molar concentrations of GDNF and RAP-GDNF, indicating that the RAP-GDNF fusion retained substantially the same potency as GDNF alone.

CONCLUSION

To resolve the inability of GDNF to cross the blood-brain barrier, GDNF was fused to a RAP, a protein previously shown to cross the blood-brain barrier. RAP-GDNF was produced in CHO cells and Western blot analysis confirmed the secretion of a disulfide-linked homodimer of approximately 120 kD. Further analysis demonstrated that RAP-GDNF bound to GFRα-1 with the same affinity (Kd) as GDNF; that the RAP-GDNF/GFRα complex bound and activated Ret; and that RAP-GDNF induced neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells in culture. This work demonstrates that RAP or receptor-selective RAP variant-GDNF fusions are likely to be potent effectors of physiological processes dependent on GDNF in vivo.

All of the compositions and/or methods disclosed and claimed herein can be made and executed without undue experimentation in light of the present disclosure. While the compositions and methods of this invention have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art that variations may be applied to the compositions and/or methods and in the steps or in the sequence of steps of the method described herein without departing from the concept, spirit and scope of the invention. More specifically, it will be apparent that certain agents which are both chemically and physiologically related may be substituted for the agents described herein while the same or similar results would be achieved. All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilled in the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

The references cited herein throughout, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are all specifically incorporated herein by reference.

REFERENCES

-   1. May, P., Bock, H. H., and Herz, J. (2003) Sci STKE 2003, PE12. -   2. Herz, J., and Willnow, T. E. (1995) Atherosclerosis 118 Suppl,     S37-41. -   3. Takahashi, S., Sakai, J., Fujino, T., Miyamori, I., and     Yamamoto, T. T. (2003) Mol. Cell. Biochem. 248, 121-7. -   4. Herz, J., and Bock, H. H. (2002) Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71, 405-34. -   5. Hahn-Dantona, E., Ruiz, J. F., Bornstein, P., and     Strickland, D. K. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 15498-503. -   6. Neels, J. G., Bovenschen, N., van Zonneveld, A. J., and     Lenting, P. J. (2000) Trends Cardiovasc Med 10, 8-14. -   7. Martin, S., Vincent, J. P., and Mazella, J. (2003) J. Neurosci.     23, 1198-205. -   8. Schneider, W. J., and Nimpf, J. (2003) Cell Mol Life Sci 60,     892-903. -   9. Li, Y., Lu, W., He, X., Schwartz, A. L., and Bu, G. (2004)     Oncogene 23, 9129-35. -   10. Hoang, B. H., Kubo, T., Healey, J. H., Sowers, R., Mazza, B.,     Yang, R., Huvos, A. G., Meyers, P. A., and Gorlick, R. (2004)     Int. J. Cancer 109, 106-11. -   11. Verdaguer, N., Fita, I., Reithmayer, M., Moser, R., and     Blaas, D. (2004) Nat Struct Mol Biol 11, 429-34. -   12. Pfistermueller, D. M., Blaas, D., and Hodits, R. A. (1996) FEBS     Lett. 396, 14-20. -   13. Hoe, H. S., Harris, D. C., and Rebeck, G. W. (2005) J.     Neurochem. 93, 145-55. -   14. Qiu, Z., Crutcher, K. A., Hyman, B. T., and Rebeck, G. W. (2003)     Neuroscience 122, 291-303. -   15. Basu, S., Binder, R. J., Ramalingam, T., and     Srivastava, P. K. (2001) Immunity 14, 303-13. -   16. Benchenane, K., Berezowski, V., Ali, C., Fernandez-Monreal, M.,     Lopez-Atalaya, J. P., Brillault, J., Chuquet, J., Nouvelot, A.,     MacKenzie, E. T., Bu, G., Cecchelli, R., Touzani, O., and     Vivien, D. (2005) Circulation 111, 2241-9. -   17. Dehouck, B., Fenart, L., Dehouck, M. P., Pierce, A., Torpier,     G., and Cecchelli, R. (1997) J. Cell Biol. 138, 877-89. -   18. Fillebeen, C., Descamps, L., Dehouck, M. P., Fenart, L.,     Benaissa, M., Spik, G., Cecchelli, R., and Pierce, A. (1999) J.     Biol. Chem. 274, 7011-7. -   19. Pan, W., Kastin, A. J., Zankel, T. C., Van Kerkhof, P.,     Terasaki, T., and Bu, G. (2004) J. Cell Sci. Pt. -   20. Moestrup, S. K., and Verroust, P. J. (2001) Annu Rev Nutr 21,     407-28. -   21. Marino, M., Zheng, G., Chiovato, L., Pinchera, A., Brown, D.,     Andrews, D., and McCluskey, R. T. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275,     7125-37. -   22. Deane, R., Wu, Z., Sagare, A., Davis, J., Du Yan, S., Hamm, K.,     Xu, F., Parisi, M., LaRue, B., Hu, H. W., Spijkers, P., Guo, H.,     Song, X., Lenting, P. J., Van Nostrand, W. E., and     Zlokovic, B. V. (2004) Neuron 43, 333-44. -   23. Mizuguchi, T., Furuta, I., Watanabe, Y., Tsukamoto, K., Tomita,     H., Tsujihata, M., Ohta, T., Kishino, T., Matsumoto, N., Minakami,     H., Niikawa, N., and Yoshiura, K. (2004) J Hum Genet. 49, 80-6. -   24. Boucher, P., Gotthardt, M., Li, W. P., Anderson, R. G., and     Herz, J. (2003) Science 300, 329-32. -   25. Tanimoto, H., Shigemasa, K., Tian, X., Gu, L., Beard, J. B.,     Sawasaki, T., and O'Brien, T. J. (2005) Br J Cancer 92, 278-83. -   26. Kataoka, H., Tanaka, H., Nagaike, K., Uchiyama, S., and     Itoh, H. (2003) Hum Cell 16, 1-14. -   27. Johnson, M. D., Oberst, M. D., Lin, C. Y., and     Dickson, R. B. (2003) Expert Rev Mol Diagn 3, 331-8. -   28. Santin, A. D., Cane, S., Bellone, S., Bignotti, E., Palmieri,     M., De Las Casas, L. E., Anfossi, S., Roman, J. J., O'Brien, T., and     Pecorelli, S. (2003) Cancer 98, 1898-904. -   29. Oberst, M., Anders, J., Xie, B., Singh, B., Ossandon, M.,     Johnson, M., Dickson, R. B., and Lin, C. Y: (2001) Am J Pathol 158,     1301-11. -   30. Lee, J. W., Yong Song, S., Choi, J. J., Lee, S. J., Kim, B. G.,     Park, C. S., Lee, J. H., Lin, C. Y., Dickson, R. B., and     Bac, D. S. (2005) Hum Pathol 36, 626-33. -   31. Hoang, C. D., D'Cunha, J., Kratzke, M. G., Casmey, C. E.,     Frizelle, S. P., Maddaus, M. A., and Kratzke, R. A. (2004) Chest     125, 1843-52. -   32. Santin, A. D., Zhan, F., Bellone, S., Palmieri, M., Cane, S.,     Bignotti, E., Anfossi, S., Gokden, M., Dunn, D., Roman, J. J.,     O'Brien, T. J., Tian, E., Cannon, M. J., Shaughnessy, J., Jr., and     Pecorelli, S. (2004) Int J Cancer 112, 14-25. -   33. Oberst, M. D., Johnson, M. D., Dickson, R. B., Lin, C. Y.,     Singh, B., Stewart, M., Williams, A., al-Nafussi, A., Smyth, J. F.,     Gabra, H., and Sellar, G. C. (2002) Clin Cancer Res 8, 1101-7. -   34. Nagaike, K., Kohama, K., Uchiyama, S., Tanaka, H., Chijiiwa, K.,     Itoh, H., and Kataoka, H. (2004) Cancer Sci 95, 728-35. -   35. Suzuki, M., Kobayashi, H., Kanayama, N., Saga, Y., Lin, C. Y.,     Dickson, R. B., and Terao, T. (2004) J Biol Chem 279, 14899-908. -   36. Postina, R., Schroeder, A., Dewachter, I., Bohl, J., Schmitt,     U., Kojro, E., Prinzen, C., Endres, K., Hiemke, C., Blessing, M.,     Flamez, P., Dequenne, A., Godaux, E., van Leuven, F., and     Fahrenholz, F. (2004) J. Clin. Invest. 113, 1456-64. -   37. Pollack, A. (2005) NY Times (Print), C1, C2. -   38. Irie, S., and Tavassoli, M. (1991) Cell Biol Rev 25, 317-33,     340-1. -   39. Bickel, U., Yoshikawa, T., and Pardridge, W. M. (2001) Adv Drug     Deliv Rev 46, 247-79. -   40. Tsuzuki, S., Murai, N., Miyake, Y., Inouye, K., Hirayasu, H.,     Iwanaga, T., and Fushiki, T. (2005) Biochem J 388, 679-87. -   41. Oberst, M. D., Williams, C. A., Dickson, R. B., Johnson, M. D.,     and Lin, C. Y. (2003) J Biol Chem 278, 26773-9. -   42. Hung, R. J., Hsu Ia, W., Dreiling, J. L., Lee, M. J.,     Williams, C. A., Oberst, M. D., Dickson, R. B., and     Lin, C. Y. (2004) Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286, C1159-69. -   43. Simonovic, M., Dolmer, K., Huang, W., Strickland, D. K., Volz,     K., and Gettins, P. G. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 15127-34. -   44. Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., and Gibson, T. J. (1994)     Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673-80. -   45. Rudenko, G., Henry, L., Henderson, K., Ichtchenko, K., Brown, M.     S., Goldstein, J. L., and Deisenhofer, J. (2002) Science 298,     2353-8. -   46. Prince, W. S., McCormick, L. M., Wendt, D. J., Fitzpatrick, P.     A., Schwartz, K. L., Aguilera, A. I., Koppaka, V., Christianson, T.     M., Vellard, M. C., Pavloff, N., Lemontt, J. F., Qin, M., Starr, C.     M., Bu, G., and Zankel, T. C. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35037-46. -   47. Wang, Q. Y., Dolmer, K., Huang, W., Gettins, P. G., and     Rong, L. (2001) J. Virol. 75, 2051-8. -   48. Huang, W., Dolmer, K., and Gettins, P. G. (1999) J. Biol. Chem.     274, 14130-6. -   49. Dolmer, K., Huang, W., and Gettins, P. G. (2000) J. Biol. Chem.     275, 3264-9. -   50. Dolmer, K., Huang, W., and Gettins, P. G. (1998) Biochemistry     37, 17016-23. -   51. Vash, B., Phung, N., Zein, S., and DeCamp, D. (1998) Blood 92,     3277-85. -   52. Migliorini, M. M., Behre, E. H., Brew, S., Ingham, K. C., and     Strickland, D. K. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 17986-92. -   53. Andersen, O. M., Christensen, L. L., Christensen, P. A.,     Sorensen, E. S., Jacobsen, C., Moestrup, S. K., Etzerodt, M., and     Thogersen, H. C. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275, 21017-24. -   54. Andersen, 0. M., Schwarz, F. P., Eisenstein, E., Jacobsen, C.,     Moestrup, S. K., Etzerodt, M., and Thogersen, H. C. (2001)     Biochemistry 40, 15408-17. -   55. Olsen, B. R. (1999) J. Cell Biol. 147, 909-12. -   56. Andersen, B. M., Petersen, H. H., Jacobsen, C., Moestrup, S. K.,     Etzerodt, M., Andreasen, P. A., and Thogersen, H. C. (2001)     Biochem. J. 357, 289-96. -   57. Andersen, B. M., Vorum, H., Honore, B., and     Thogersen, H. C. (2003) BMC Biochem 4, 7. -   58. Horn, I. R., van den Berg, B. M., van der Meijden, P. Z.,     Pannekoek, H., and van Zonneveld, A. J. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272,     13608-13. -   59. Andersen, 0. M., Christensen, P. A., Christensen, L. L.,     Jacobsen, C., Moestrup, S. K., Etzerodt, M., and     Thogersen, H. C. (2000) Biochemistry 39, 10627-33. -   60. Medved, L. V., Migliorini, M., Mikhailenko, I., Barrientos, L.     G., Llinas, M., and Strickland, D. K. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274,     717-27. -   61. Zheng, G., Bachinsky, D. R., Stamenkovic, I., Strickland, D. K.,     Brown, D., Andres, G., and McCluskey, R. T. (1994) J. Histochem.     Cytochem. 42, 531-42. -   62. Orlando, R. A., Exner, M., Czekay, R. P., Yamazaki, H., Saito,     A., Ullrich, R., Kerjaschki, D., and Farquhar, M. G. (1997) Proc.     Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94, 2368-73. -   63. Sidhu, S. S., Lowman, H. B., Cunningham, B. C., and     Wells, J. A. (2000) Methods Enzymol. 328, 333-63.

TABLE 1 variable positions LRP2 CR89 LRP1 CR3-5 d3 sequence 213 217 249 251 256 270 K_(d) (nM) % max K_(d) (nM) % max RAP S E H E K K NF 5% 16 ± 4 76% RAP E217K S K H E K K NF 5%  9 ± 1 91% RAP H249Y S E Y E K K NF 2% 28 ± 8 90% RAP E251K S E H K K K NF 5%  7 ± 1 100% RAP K270E S E H E K E NF 2% NF 4% RAP K256A, K270E S E H E A E NF 3% NF 2% RAP E251K, K270E S E H K K E NF 2% NF 4% RAP E251K, K256A, K270E S E H K A E 114 ± 32  40% NF 2% RAPv2 T K Y K A E 38 ± 3  88% NF 4% RAPv2 T213S S K Y K A E 19 ± 1  94% NF 2% RAPv2 K217E T E Y K A E 25 ± 1  88% NF 2% RAPv2 Y249H T K H K A E NF 35% NF 2% RAPv2 K251E T K Y E A E NF 11% NF 2% RAPv2 A256K T K Y K K E NF 2% NF 6% RAPv2 E270K T K Y K A K 8 ± 1 100% 114 ± 31 85% RAPv2 A256K, E270K T K Y K K K 72 ± 11 73%   4 ± 0.3 93% RAPv2 K251E, E270K T K Y E A K 153 ± 104 16% NF 16%

TABLE 2 LRP2 CR89 loop variants RAP d3 1040 1047 1081 1088 % max v2A d3 A C A′ C′ K_(d) (nM) bind K_(d) (nM) % max bind Y V W R NF 7% 33 ± 2  100% Y V W D NF 7% 78 ± 25 55% Y D W D NF 6% NF 3% Y D W R NF 6% NF 11% W V W R NF 9% NF 5% W D W R NF 11% NF 3% W V W D NF 16% NF 4% W D W D NF 15% NF 1%

TABLE 3 d3 CR K_(d) 249 251 256 257 266 270 279 280 296 305 RAP LRP1 CR3-5 16 ± 4 H E K H I K D G R K RAPv2 LRP2 CR89 38 ± 3 Y K A E 

1. A polypeptide comprising an amino acid sequence variant of the alpha-2-macroglobulin/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-associated protein 1 (RAP) of SEQ ID NO: 2, wherein said amino acid sequence variant of RAP binds to LRP2 with an affinity that is at least 3-fold greater than binding to LRPP1.
 2. The polypeptide of claim 1, wherein said amino acid sequence variant of RAP binds to LRP2 with an affinity that is at least 3-fold greater than binding to LRP1, LRP6, VLDLR and matriptase.
 3. The polypeptide of claim 1 wherein said RAP variant lacks amino acids 1-143 and 320-323 of SEQ ID NO:
 2. 4. The polypeptide of claims 1-3 wherein the variant contains at least one mutation at any one of positions 249, 251, 256 and 270 of RAP.
 5. The polypeptide of claims 1-3 wherein the variant comprises a mutation at position 249 of RAP.
 6. The polypeptide of any one of claims 1-5 wherein the variant comprises a mutation at position 251 of RAP.
 7. The polypeptide of any one of claims 1-6 wherein the variant comprises a mutation at position 256 of RAP.
 8. The polypeptide of any one of claims 1-7 wherein the variant comprises a mutation at position 270 of RAP.
 9. The polypeptide of any of claims 1-8 wherein the variant contains at least one additional mutation within positions 271-319 of RAP.
 10. The polypeptide of any of claims 1-8 wherein the variant contains at least one mutation within positions 205-250 of RAP.
 11. The polypeptide according to any one of claims 4-10, wherein said mutation is the replacement of an acidic amino acid with a basic amino acid.
 12. The polypeptide of claim 11, wherein said acidic amino acid is selected from the group consisting of D and E.
 13. A polypeptide of claim 11, wherein said basic amino acid is selected from the group consisting of K and R.
 14. A polypeptide according to any one of claims 4-11, wherein said mutation is the replacement of a basic amino acid with an acidic amino acid.
 15. A polypeptide of claim 14, wherein said basic amino acid is selected from the group consisting of K and R.
 16. A polypeptide of claim 1014 wherein said acidic amino acid is selected from the group consisting of D and E.
 17. A polypeptide according to any one of claims 4-10, wherein said mutation is the replacement of an amino acid selected from the group consisting of A, C, D, E, G, I, K, L, M, N, P, Q, R, S, T, and V with an amino acid selected from the group consisting of F, Y, W, and H.
 18. The polypeptide of any of claims 1-8 that comprises a mutation at three or more of the following positions: 175, 205, 213, 217, 226, 230, 232, 239, 246, 249, 251, 256, 257, 261, 266, 267, 268, 270, 273, 287, 290, 294, 296, 297, 298, 312,
 313. 19. The polypeptide of any of claims 1-8 that comprises three or more of the following mutations: V175L, S213T, E217K, H249Y, E251K, K256A, K270E, R205S, S213T, E217K, L226M, H249Y, E230V, S232P, E239G, E246G, E251L, E251K, E251T, E251G, E251P, E251N, E251R, K256R, K256V, K256A, K256I, K256P, K256L, I266F, I266T, K257Y, Q261R, A267V, H268R, K270P, K270D, K270N, K270G, K270E, K270W, H273Y, R287H, H290Y, H290L, E294V, R296L, T297I, K298R, S312F, G313D.
 20. A polypeptide consisting of oligomeric combinations of polypeptides of any of claims 1-19 with binding multivalent binding properties defined by each polypeptide of the combination.
 21. An antibody that binds to a CR of any one of LRP2, LRP6, VLDLR, FDC-8D6 or matriptase.
 22. An antibody that binds to at least two repeated CR domains of any one of LRP2, LRP6, VLDLR, FDC-8D6 or matriptase.
 23. The antibody of claim 21 or 22 that binds to any one of LRP2, LRP6, VLDLR FDC-8D6 or matriptase with at least 10⁻⁸M or higher binding affinity.
 24. The antibody of any of claims 21-23 that binds with at least 3-fold higher affinity to any one of LRP2, LRP6, VLDLR, FDC-8D6 or matriptase compared to LRP1.
 25. The antibody of claim 24 that binds with at least 3-fold higher affinity to any one of LRP2, LRP6, VLDLR, FDC-8D6 or matriptase compared to at least 4 other CR-containing proteins.
 26. A method of treating a disease by administering a polypeptide of any of claims 1-25 wherein said polypeptide selectively binds to a protein that is involved in the pathophysiology of the disease.
 27. A compound comprising the polypeptide according to any one of claims 1-26 conjugated to a diagnostic or therapeutic agent.
 28. The compound of claim 27, wherein the polypeptide and diagnostic or therapeutic agent are linked through a linker.
 29. The compound of claim 28, wherein said linker is a peptide linker.
 30. The compound of claim 27, wherein the therapeutic agent is selected from the group consisting of a glial cell-derived neuronal growth factor (GDNF), brain-derived neuronal growth factor (BDNF, neuronal growth factor (NGF), disintegrin and metalloproteinase domain 10 (ADAM10), a chaperone protein for LRP5/6 (MESD), cancer chemotherapeutic agents, protease inhibitors, pro-apoptotic molecules, autoimmune antigens, lysosomal enzymes, nanoparticles, glycoconjugates and nucleic acids.
 31. A pharmaceutical composition comprising a compound of any of claims 1-25 or 27 or 30 in a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier, diluent or excipient.
 32. A method of delivering a diagnostic or therapeutic agent into the central nervous system of an animal comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition of claim 31 to a subject in need thereof.
 33. The method of claim 32 wherein said subject is a human subject suffering from a neurological disease.
 34. The method of claim 33 wherein the neurological disease is selected from the group consisting of Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, Multiple Sclerosis, Amylotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, and a central nervous system cancer.
 35. A method of delivering a diagnostic or therapeutic agent to a specific tissue or set of tissues of a subject comprising administering a pharmaceutical composition of claim 31 to a subject in need thereof.
 36. The method of claim 35 wherein the agent is delivered across the blood-brain barrier.
 37. A nucleic acid that encodes a polypeptide according to any one of claims 1-25 or 27-30.
 38. A method of screening for a RAP variant or antibody or conjugate of any of claims 1-25 or 27-30 comprising the steps of: (a) generating a candidate RAP variant or antibody; and (b) measuring binding of the candidate RAP variant or antibody to at least two CR domains from a CR-containing protein, wherein the CR domains are identified by a combination of amino acids within the calcium binding loop that does not exist in any other pair of CR domains within all CR-containing proteins.
 39. A method of screening for a RAP variant or antibody or conjugate of any of claims 1-25 or 27-30 comprising the steps of (a) generating a candidate RAP variant or antibody, and (b) measuring binding of the candidate RAP variant or antibody to at least two CR domains from a CR-containing protein, wherein the CR domains are identified by a combination of amino acids within the calcium-binding loop which exists within less than 10% of CR pairs among all CR-containing proteins. 